EMB: Hypothesis Testing Flashcards

1
Q

RR:

A

(population 1 (i.e. diseased) / total) / (population 2 / total)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

RRI:

A

1 - (RR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Absolute risk increase:

A

(population 2/total) - (population 1/total)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Number Needed to Harm

A

1 / (absolute risk increase)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Independent Variable:

Dependent Variable

A

I: Exposure (predictor, explanatory, risk factor)
D: Outcome (response)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Important Study Parameters:

A
  1. Types of intervention
  2. What outcome is being assessed
  3. What is the study population
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Null Hypothesis

A

No difference between groups. RR=1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Alternative Hypothesis

A

Exposure is associated with disease.

Can be 1 or 2 sided:
RR>1 or RR doesn’t equal 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Parametric methods

A

Require some assumptions

Compare different means
T-tests and ANOVA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Nonparametric methods

A

no assumptinos

categorical data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Chi-square test

A

compares PROPORTION between two (or more) groups. Categorical data (yes/no).

(male vs. female)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

t-test

A

compares MEAN values between TWO groups

Continuous variable (all different age),

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ANOVA

A

analyzes data that includes MULTIPLE variables

compare MEAN values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

z-score

A

measure of standard deviation where data is transformed to standard normal distribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hypothesis test

A

compare test statistic to critical value (-1.96 to 1.96) if above or below, statistically significant.

This correlates with a P-Value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

P-value

A

probabilty that an association as strong or stronger might have arisen by chance alone (IF NULL HYPOTHESIS WERE TRUE)

NOT probability THAT null hypothesis were true.

17
Q

What must you consider when assessing Sample Size

A
  • Type of Study
  • Magnitude of difference (what will be clinically important by setting alpha and beta)
    • *As difference desired is LARGER (very prevalent), you want smaller population
  • *As ALPHA and POWER is smaller the sample becomes larger
  • Random Error
  • Power
18
Q

Type I Error and Alpha value

A

Reject Null Hypothesis, but shouldn’t have

Alpha: probability of making a type I error (.05), smaller risk of being wrong because don’t want to change something if you’re wrong.

19
Q

Type II Error

Beta value

A

Don’t reject Null Hypothesis, but should have. Often due to inadequate power (small population).

Beta: probability of making a type II error. (0.20)

20
Q

Power

A

Ability of a study to detect a true difference between groups (1 -beta)
b= .2 then power =.8 detecting a difference

21
Q

Point Estimate

A
  • indicator of magnitude of effect

- must be supplemented with measure of random error AKA confidence interval

22
Q

Confidence interval

A

Measure of Precision. 95% of the time this effect will happen. Lower Bound (Null Hypothesis1) ( your Point estimate) Higher Bound

23
Q

Intention-to-Treat

A

“analyze what you randomize.” Include ALL participants in analysis, regardless of follow-up (increases generalizability)

24
Q

Stratified Analysis

A

Examine exposure-outcome relationship in subgroups (male/female)

25
Q

Adjusted Analysis

A

Control for effect of extraneous variables on the exposure-outcome relationship (control for confounding)

26
Q

Confounding

A

Estimate of the exposure effect is distorted because it is mixed with effect of extraneous factor