Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Worldview > Elements Of Apologetics > Flashcards

Elements Of Apologetics Flashcards

1
Q

What are some reasons young Christians are leaving the church according to a 2016 Pew Research Center survey?

A
  • Learning about evolution when I went away to college
  • Religion is the opiate of the people
  • Rational thought makes religion go out the window
  • Lack of any sort of scientific or specific evidence of a creator
  • I just realized somewhere along the line that I didn’t really believe it
  • I’m doing a lot more learning, studying and kind of making decisions myself rather than listening to someone else

These reasons highlight a dissatisfaction with the credibility of the Christian message rather than personal grievances with church leadership or politics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does Tim Keller emphasize about inherited beliefs?

A

It is no longer sufficient to hold beliefs just because you inherited them.

This perspective encourages individuals to critically examine their beliefs rather than accepting them passively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did W. K. Clifford argue about avoiding doubts regarding one’s beliefs?

A

Ducking questions regarding one’s beliefs is not only irresponsible, but also immoral.

Clifford believed that suppressing doubts leads to a failure to engage with the truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the suggested approach towards doubts according to the text?

A

It is good to impose doubts upon our beliefs and investigate their claims with urgency and passion.

This approach encourages critical thinking and reinforces one’s understanding of their beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does apologetics benefit believers according to John Frame?

A

Apologetics becomes useful for believers who sometimes doubt, even apart from its role in dialogue with unbelievers.

This highlights the importance of apologetics in strengthening personal faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Douglas Groothuis say about the purpose of apologetics?

A

Apologetics fortifies believers in their faith, whether they are wrestling with doubts or seeking a deeper grounding for their biblical beliefs.

This indicates that apologetics serves both as a defense against outside challenges and as a support for internal faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Edward J. Carnell criticize about how some teachers approach students’ faith?

A

He criticized teachers for withholding evidences that may disturb the student’s faith, calling it ‘robbery.’

Carnell believed that this approach leads to academic conditioning rather than true education.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a key message regarding facing attacks on faith?

A

If you want to stand for God’s truth, you will eventually face attack and may need to adopt the resolve to say, ‘Bring it on.’

This encourages a proactive stance in defending one’s beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Fill in the blank: According to the text, the study of _______ is helpful for both the unbeliever and the believer.

A

[apologetics]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the term ‘apologetics’ originate from?

A

The Greek word ‘apologia’, meaning a defense against an accusation

The term is often associated with courtroom defenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In what context did Socrates use the term ‘apologia’?

A

To defend himself against the charge of preaching strange gods

This is detailed in Plato’s dialogue, ‘The Apology’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a major challenge faced by Christians today according to the text?

A

Western culture is increasingly less supportive of Christian claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What biblical verse illustrates the impact of early Christians?

A

Acts 17:6, where it says, ‘These men who have upset the world have come here also.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

According to 1 Peter 3:15, what must one possess to offer the hope of the gospel?

A

‘The hope that is in you.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fill in the blank: The hope in Christ’s redemptive work must eventually become _______.

A

[your own]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What must believers eventually express about their faith according to the text?

A

‘It is no longer because of what you said that I believe, for I have heard for myself.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What role does apologetics play in a believer’s life?

A

It involves the defense of one’s faith and the offer of faith to a skeptical world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

According to Matthew 5:13, what happens if salt loses its taste?

A

It is no longer good for anything except to be thrown out.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What must an unbeliever do to fill their inner explanatory slots?

A

They must have a personal encounter with faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What does Psalm 34:8 encourage believers to do?

A

‘Taste and see that the Lord is good.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the intended purpose of studying apologetics according to the text?

A

For personal use in defending one’s faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What metaphor is used to illustrate the need for preparation before engaging with skepticism?

A

Putting up an umbrella before going out into the rain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

According to 1 Peter 3:15, how should believers be prepared?

A

Always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the second challenge for an apologist as presented in the text?

A

To defend a weaker Christian against atheistic credibilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What metaphor does Job use to describe defending the weak?

A

I broke the jaws of the wicked and snatched the prey from his teeth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What must believers do if they have the means to help those in the grip of evil?

A

They must step in and help.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What does 1 Peter 3:13-15 emphasize regarding believers and their defense of faith?

A

Believers should be ready to make a defense for their hope with gentleness and reverence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

According to Luke 12:11-12, what should believers not worry about when brought before authorities?

A

They should not worry about how or what to speak in their defense, as the Holy Spirit will teach them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

How does Peter suggest believers should respond when slandered or threatened?

A

Maintain a good conscience and give a reasoned defense of their beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

In which book of the New Testament is the Greek word ‘apologia’ most commonly used?

A

The book of Acts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Fill in the blank: According to 1 Peter 3:15, believers should always be ready to make a _______.

A

[defense]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What rhetorical strength did Stephen demonstrate in Acts 6:9-10?

A

He spoke with wisdom and the Spirit, which his opponents could not cope with.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

True or False: According to 1 John 4:1, believers are encouraged to test the spirits to discern their origin.

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What does 2 Corinthians 10:5 highlight about capturing thoughts?

A

It emphasizes taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What is the context in which Paul used the word ‘apologia’ in Philippians 1:16?

A

He referred to his appointment for the defense of the gospel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What should believers do according to Titus 1:9 regarding sound doctrine?

A

Exhort in sound doctrine and refute those who contradict.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

In Acts 17:16-17, where was Paul reasoning with Jews and God-fearing Gentiles?

A

In the synagogue and the marketplace.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

According to Philippians 1:7, what is significant about Paul’s imprisonment?

A

It relates to the defense and confirmation of the gospel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Fill in the blank: According to Luke 21:14, believers should make up their minds not to prepare beforehand to _______.

A

[defend themselves]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What does the phrase ‘sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts’ imply in the context of apologetics?

A

It indicates a deep commitment to Christ that underpins the believer’s defense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What is meant by ‘truth’ in the context of this course?

A

An accurate description of reality

Truth is defined in relation to the correspondence theory, which asserts that a statement is true if it corresponds to reality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What is the correspondence theory of truth?

A

A theory stating that a statement is true if it corresponds to reality

This perspective emphasizes that truth is non-negotiable and essential for Christian beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

How does the text define ‘reality’?

A

What is there

The term ‘objective reality’ is used to clarify that the identity of an object is inherent to it, not dependent on the observer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What is the difference between truth and knowledge?

A

Truth is an accurate description of reality; knowledge is a personal claim to such reality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What does knowledge refer to in this context?

A

How a truth claim is justified

Knowledge is an epistemological concept, contrasting with truth’s metaphysical nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What is a proposition?

A

Any statement that provides a claim to truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

According to Plato, what must knowledge be considered beyond a truthful claim?

A

More than merely a truthful claim; it requires justification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

What is the proposed definition of knowledge by epistemologists?

A

Justified true belief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

What warning does the apostle Paul give regarding knowledge?

A

To avoid worldly and empty chatter and arguments falsely called ‘knowledge’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Fill in the blank: A judgement is said to be true when it conforms to _______.

A

external reality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

What does the term ‘essentialism’ refer to in the context of truth?

A

The identity of an object depends upon its intrinsic essence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

True or False: Truth and knowledge are the same idea.

A

False.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

What does it mean to have a justified truth claim?

A

To have a basis for asserting that the claim is accurate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

In the statement ‘Sally sees the tree,’ what is the object?

A

The tree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
55
Q

What is the significance of the correspondence view of truth for Christians?

A

It is essential for maintaining the integrity of Christian beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
56
Q

According to Thomas Aquinas, when is a judgement considered true?

A

When it conforms to external reality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
57
Q

What did D. Elton Trueblood summarize regarding minds, propositions, and objects?

A

Minds may be knowing or ignorant; propositions may be true or false; objects may be real or imaginary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
58
Q

Fill in the blank: Truth deals with what is ‘out there,’ while knowledge deals with what I surmise about truth ‘in _______.

A

here.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
59
Q

What is the Correspondent Method for Knowing?

A

Acquiring knowledge through correspondence between observation and stored awareness

This method asserts that if an observation matches the stored awareness of what it is, it is considered knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
60
Q

How does the Correspondent Method justify knowledge claims?

A

By matching perception with external reality

An example is claiming ‘the baseball is in the yard’ based on visual confirmation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
61
Q

What is meant by ‘justified true belief’ in the context of knowledge?

A

A belief that is true and can be justified through evidence or observation

This definition was challenged by Edmund Gettier, who presented scenarios where beliefs were justified but not knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
62
Q

Who is Edmund Gettier and what is his contribution to epistemology?

A

An American philosopher known for the ‘Gettier Problem,’ challenging the ‘justified true belief’ definition of knowledge

Gettier’s work in 1963 demonstrated that justified true beliefs could be true for reasons unrelated to the justification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
63
Q

What is the Gettier Problem?

A

Examples of justified true beliefs that do not constitute knowledge due to flawed justification

Illustrations like ‘A Cow in a Field’ show how true beliefs can arise from misleading observations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
64
Q

What is the empirical approach in the context of knowledge?

A

A reliance on observation and the senses to acquire knowledge

This approach emphasizes the importance of sensory experience in forming truth claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
65
Q

What is induction in empirical reasoning?

A

A method of confirming knowledge by compiling multiple observations from different perspectives

Induction helps improve the reliability of correspondent claims by comparing observations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
66
Q

Why is Farmer Field’s claim about Daisy problematic?

A

His claim was based on a narrow observation that was true by coincidence, not by proper justification

Farmer Field saw a shape that resembled Daisy, but it was actually a piece of paper.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
67
Q

What does it mean for a conclusion to be provisional?

A

It represents the best temporary understanding based on current observations, subject to change with new evidence

Scientific conclusions are often provisional as they rely on accumulated data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
68
Q

Fill in the blank: The theory of knowledge that relies on observation and senses is known as _______.

A

[empirical approach]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
69
Q

True or False: Inductive reasoning guarantees absolute certainty in knowledge claims.

A

False

Inductive reasoning leads to probabilistic conclusions, not certainties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
70
Q

What phrase summarizes the empiricist’s view of truth?

A

‘Truth is what endless corroborating observations will yield.’

This definition emphasizes the reliance on continuous observation to establish what is true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
71
Q

What is the provisional nature of correspondent truth claims?

A

It implies that future observations could potentially invalidate current claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
72
Q

How is the network of past correspondent identifications structured?

A

It is cataloged within a vast network in memory that fits with the layout of existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
73
Q

What does Groothuis assert about truths?

A

All truths cohere with one another as expressions of God’s harmonious objective reality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
74
Q

What does the epistemic method of coherence propose?

A

A proposition can be justified if it fits with all other propositions already deemed true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
75
Q

What is the difference between coherence and correspondence?

A

Coherence seeks what makes sense, while correspondence seeks what matches.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
76
Q

What analogy is used to explain coherence in truth claims?

A

The analogy of a crossword puzzle, where words must fit together.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
77
Q

According to Augustine, how can uncertain propositions gain certainty?

A

When joined by valid inference to propositions that are true and certain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
78
Q

What is the distinction between coherence and metaphysics?

A

Coherence is a theory of knowledge, not of truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
79
Q

What does Groothuis say about the logical consistency of the biblical worldview?

A

It is a necessary condition of its truth but not a sufficient condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
80
Q

What is the correspondence theory of truth?

A

It defines truth as correspondence and coherence as a necessary, but not sufficient, test of truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
81
Q

What enhances the coherent, or rational, approach?

A

The methodology of deduction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
82
Q

How does deduction relate to rational reasoning?

A

It begins with unquestionable premises and uses valid arguments to derive truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
83
Q

What does coherence seek in relation to truth claims?

A

It seeks to determine if a claim fits within the broader context of reality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
84
Q

What is the primary function of the epistemic effort of correspondence?

A

To generate truth claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
85
Q

Can coherence generate a predicted correspondence?

A

Yes, as demonstrated by Einstein’s thought experiments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
86
Q

What are the two epistemic methods discussed?

A

Correspondence and coherence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
87
Q

Fill in the blank: The method that substantiates the conclusions of correspondence is _______.

A

Induction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
88
Q

Fill in the blank: The method that substantiates the conclusions of coherence is _______.

A

Deduction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
89
Q

What does the rational approach emphasize?

A

Uncovering general principles that can accommodate particular truth claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
90
Q

What is the relationship between coherence and the Christian worldview?

A

Coherence within its features is necessary for its truthfulness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
91
Q

True or False: Coherence theory of truth is sufficient to prove the truth of a claim.

A

False.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
92
Q

What is the primary question Classical Apologetics seeks to address?

A

Is our faith reasonable?

This question is rooted in the belief that the unexamined faith is not worth believing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
93
Q

Which philosophical figures are primarily associated with Classical Apologetics?

A

Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas.

Their thoughts form the foundation of the Classical apologetic approach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
94
Q

What are the two steps in Classical Apologetics reasoning?

A
  1. Use philosophical arguments to indicate the existence of a creator.
  2. Use historical arguments to verify Christian truth claims.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
95
Q

What is the first step of Classical Apologetics considered to be?

A

A prelude to other evidences.

This step prepares for the presentation of specific miraculous truths.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
96
Q

What does C. S. Lewis state about approaching the God of Christian theology?

A

I am not yet within a hundred miles of the God of Christian theology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
97
Q

According to Francis Schaeffer, what is the first part of the Gospel?

A

God is there.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
98
Q

How did the apostle Paul begin his address to the Athenians?

A

He first targeted the creation before mentioning Jesus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
99
Q

What are Theistic proofs in Classical Apologetics?

A

Deductive arguments positing an indubitable feature of existence as a premise to conclude God’s existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
100
Q

What are the three fundamental laws of logic both Christians and atheists must adhere to?

A
  1. The Law of Identity.
  2. The Law of Non-Contradiction.
  3. The Law of the Excluded Middle.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
101
Q

Fill in the blank: The Law of Identity states that _______.

A

A is A.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
102
Q

Fill in the blank: The Law of Non-Contradiction states that _______.

A

A is not non-A.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
103
Q

Fill in the blank: The Law of the Excluded Middle states that _______.

A

Either A or non-A.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
104
Q

What does J. P. Moreland assert about God’s behavior in relation to logic?

A

God never behaves illogically in the proper sense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
105
Q

What is general revelation in the context of Classical Apologetics?

A

God has revealed Himself in nature and conscience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
106
Q

What does natural theology engage in?

A

Logic to derive rational arguments from God’s existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
107
Q

According to Psalm 19:1-4, what do the heavens declare?

A

The glory of God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
108
Q

What does Romans 1:20 state about God’s attributes?

A

His invisible attributes, eternal power, and divine nature have been clearly seen.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
109
Q

What is the Classical apologist’s approach to finding common ground with non-Christians?

A

Emphasizing coherent forms within the cosmos and the laws of logic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
110
Q

True or False: Classical Apologetics begins with addressing specific doctrines of Christianity.

A

False.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
111
Q

What does Groothuis suggest about the apostle Paul’s approach to common ground?

A

Paul noted the Athenians were ‘very religious’ to build a bridge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
112
Q

What is the classical apologetic approach associated with?

A

The contribution of Thomas Aquinas and Aristotle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
113
Q

What are Aquinas’ Five Ways?

A

Arguments for the existence of God from change, efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and governance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
114
Q

What does the first way of Aquinas argue?

A

The argument from change; everything that is changed is changed by something else, leading to a first cause of change which is God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
115
Q

What is the second way based on?

A

The nature of an efficient cause; nothing can be the efficient cause of itself, leading to a first efficient cause, which is God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
116
Q

What does the third way discuss?

A

The nature of possibility and necessity; there must be something necessary in itself to account for the existence of contingent beings, which is God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
117
Q

What is the focus of the fourth way?

A

The gradation of things; there is a greatest being that is the source of all that is good, true, and noble, which is God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
118
Q

What does the fifth way emphasize?

A

The governance of things; natural bodies work towards an end by design, implying the existence of an intelligent being, which is God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
119
Q

What acronym can be used to remember Aquinas’ Five Ways?

A

MEN-GP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
120
Q

What does the acronym MEN-GP stand for?

A
  • Move
  • Efficient
  • Necessary
  • Greatest
  • Purpose
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
121
Q

What is the critique of Aquinas’ Five Ways regarding the nature of God?

A

They do not necessarily identify the God of the Bible, only a generic instigator or deity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
122
Q

What is the Rationalist Objection to the existence of God?

A
  1. There is no evidence that God exists.
  2. If there is no evidence, then it is irrational to believe that He does.
  3. Therefore, it is irrational to believe that God exists.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
123
Q

What common ground do Classical apologists share with skeptics?

A

Agreement on the need for evidence for God’s existence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
124
Q

What is the goal of the Classical apologist in response to the Rationalist Objection?

A

To challenge Premise 1 regarding the evidence for God’s existence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
125
Q

What are the five headings under which the theistic proofs are organized?

A
  1. Ontological
  2. Anthropological
  3. Moral
  4. Cosmological
  5. Teleological

These categories help to conclude God’s existence by examining the nature of God, man, and physical existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
126
Q

What does the ontological argument focus on?

A

God’s uniqueness

This argument questions whether there is something about our conception of God that confirms His existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
127
Q

What does the anthropological argument examine?

A

Human morality and immateriality

This argument explores whether our realization of human immateriality demonstrates God’s existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
128
Q

What is the main question of the moral argument?

A

Does our moral awareness demonstrate a moral standard that requires God’s existence?

This argument posits that a viable moral standard can only exist if God exists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
129
Q

What does the cosmological argument investigate?

A

Natural contingencies

This argument questions whether our awareness of natural contingencies indicates the existence of God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
130
Q

What is the focus of the teleological argument?

A

Natural specificities

This argument asks whether awareness of natural specificities indicates the existence of God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
131
Q

How is the ontological argument related to Aquinas’ work?

A

It is related to Aquinas’ 4th way dealing with graduated greatness

This connection helps to ground the ontological argument in classical philosophical thought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
132
Q

How does the anthropological argument challenge naturalism?

A

Naturalism cannot give us the entire picture of humanness

This argument emphasizes the limitations of naturalism in explaining human immateriality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
133
Q

What is the relationship between the cosmological argument and Aquinas’ work?

A

It is related to Aquinas’ 3rd way dealing with necessity and contingency

This connection provides a philosophical basis for the cosmological argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
134
Q

What does the teleological argument relate to in Aquinas’ work?

A

Aquinas’ 5th way dealing with purpose

This relationship highlights the purpose-driven aspect of the teleological argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
135
Q

True or False: The moral argument suggests that moral standards exist independently of God.

A

False

The moral argument posits that moral standards require God’s existence to be viable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
136
Q

What is the Ontological Argument?

A

The Ontological Argument claims that proper reasoning about the idea of a Perfect Being generates the conclusion that God exists.

It reasons apart from any phenomenon of existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
137
Q

Who developed the first form of the Ontological Argument?

A

Anselm of Canterbury

Anselm’s work ‘Proslogion’ was written around 1079.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
138
Q

What is Anselm’s famous definition of God?

A

God is ‘that than which no greater thing can be conceived.’

This definition implies that any attributes assigned to entities find their maximum expression in God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
139
Q

What does ontology refer to?

A

The nature of ‘being.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
140
Q

What is the first syllogism of Anselm’s argument?

A
  1. God is ‘that than which nothing greater can be conceived.’
  2. Existence is greater than nonexistence.
  3. Therefore, God exists.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
141
Q

What analogy does Anselm use to illustrate his argument?

A

The analogy of a painter conceiving a painting.

The painter has an idea in understanding before creating the actual painting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
142
Q

What is the difference between existence and nonexistence according to Anselm?

A

Existence is an attribute that is greater than nonexistence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
143
Q

What does Anselm’s second version of the argument claim?

A

God cannot be conceived not to exist.

This version introduces the concepts of necessity and contingency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
144
Q

What is a necessary being according to Anselm?

A

A being that does not depend upon anything outside of itself for existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
145
Q

What are great-making properties?

A

Attributes that provide a status for the possessor that transcends the features of a lesser entity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
146
Q

What did Gaunilo of Marmoutiers argue against Anselm’s Ontological Argument?

A

He used a reductio ad absurdum with the example of a perfect island to challenge the argument.

This example posits that the existence of a perfect island could be argued similarly to God’s existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
147
Q

What is a contingent being?

A

A being whose existence depends upon outside circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
148
Q

What is the main critique of Gaunilo’s rebuttal?

A

Gaunilo inserted a contingent entity, while Anselm’s argument requires a necessary being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
149
Q

What did Anselm claim about the concept of a Perfect Being?

A

The concept of a Perfect Being is not impossible, since it is neither nonsensical nor self-contradictory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
150
Q

True or False: The Ontological Argument relies on external observations to prove God’s existence.

A

False.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
151
Q

What is the significance of existence being a greater property than nonexistence?

A

It supports the conclusion that if God is the greatest conceivable being, then He must exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
152
Q

What are the implications of a personal being being greater than an impersonal being?

A

A personal being is an agent who brings about states of affairs according to his thoughts and designs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
153
Q

Fill in the blank: God is defined as a _______ or Perfect Being.

A

maximally great being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
154
Q

What does it mean for a being to be maximally perfect?

A

It cannot be contingent and must possess all qualities that are better to have.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
155
Q

What is the relationship between a triune being and a unitarian being in terms of greatness?

A

A triune being is greater than a unitarian being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
156
Q

Who revived Anselm’s Ontological Argument in the seventeenth century?

A

René Descartes

Descartes is known for reformulating the ontological argument for the existence of God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
157
Q

What is Descartes’ conclusion regarding the existence of God?

A

Existence is a perfection of God

Descartes argues that it is absurd to think of a perfect being lacking existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
158
Q

List the main points of Descartes’ ontological argument.

A
  • God is a supremely perfect being.
  • A property of perfection is existence.
  • Therefore, God must exist.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
159
Q

What analogy does Descartes use to explain God’s existence?

A

Valleys imply ridges

Descartes suggests that just as valleys and ridges are interconnected, so too are existence and the essence of God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
160
Q

What was Immanuel Kant’s main critique of Descartes’ argument?

A

Existence cannot be a predicate

Kant argues that saying something exists does not add any meaningful information about that thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
161
Q

What is a predicate in grammatical terms?

A

Part of a sentence that gives added information about the subject

For example, in ‘John is tall,’ ‘is tall’ is the predicate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
162
Q

According to Kant, what is the substantive difference between ‘John exists’ and merely mentioning John?

A

There is no substantive difference

Kant believes that existence does not add any new information to the concept of John.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
163
Q

What example does Kant use to illustrate his point about existence?

A

Imagining a pile of 100 thalers

Kant questions what is added by specifying that the coins exist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
164
Q

How does Kant differentiate between imagining existing and non-existing items?

A

Existing items are in the actual world, while non-existing items are in a possible world

This distinction shows that existence can be informative depending on the context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
165
Q

Fill in the blank: Kant argues that ‘Being is obviously not a real ______.’

A

predicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
166
Q

What is a ‘possible world’ in the context of Kant’s argument?

A

A world that does not exist but could exist

This concept helps differentiate between actual and hypothetical existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
167
Q

What are the five expressions or modes of being utilized in the modal ontological argument?

A

Actuality, possibility, impossibility, contingency, necessity

These modes are common predicates in modal logic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
168
Q

Who is best known for adapting the ontological argument along modal lines?

A

Alvin Plantinga

Plantinga is a Christian philosopher recognized for this adaptation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
169
Q

What is a possible world?

A

What could have happened instead of our actual world

It includes entities that could exist in a world like ours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
170
Q

How many possible worlds are there?

A

An infinite number

Possible worlds do not exist; they are imaginative scenarios.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
171
Q

What is the distinction between possible worlds and multiverse theory?

A

Possible worlds do not actually exist; multiverse theory posits actual alternate worlds

Possible worlds are imaginative constructs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
172
Q

What does the modal ontological argument suggest about God’s existence?

A

If God exists in some possible worlds, then God exists in all possible worlds

This leads to the conclusion that if God exists in all possible worlds, He exists in the actual world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
173
Q

Which premise of the modal ontological argument raises confusion regarding God’s existence in all possible worlds?

A

Premise three

It states that if God exists in some possible worlds, then He exists in all possible worlds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
174
Q

What substitute can be used for ‘God’ to understand the argument better?

A

Maximally Great Being

This substitution helps clarify the necessity involved in the argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
175
Q

What is required for a necessary being to exist in possible worlds?

A

It must exist in all possible worlds

This is based on the definition of a necessary entity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
176
Q

What question should be asked if an atheist claims that the existence of God is not possible?

A

‘What is the contradiction that makes it not possible?’

This challenges the assertion and seeks clarification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
177
Q

What do many Christian apologists think of the ontological argument?

A

They reject its merit

Some view it as a philosophical trick and argue against defining God into existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
178
Q

What is a common critique of defining God as a maximally great being?

A

‘Isn’t it your definition of God that makes His nonexistence absurd?’

This question challenges the logic of the definition itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
179
Q

Fill in the blank: The modal ontological argument utilizes notions of _______ and _______ to discuss God’s nature.

A

actuality, possibility

These concepts are integral to the argument’s reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
180
Q

True or False: Possible worlds exist in reality.

A

False

Possible worlds are theoretical constructs, not actual entities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
181
Q

What is the problem of evil in relation to the concept of God?

A

The problem of evil questions how a maximally great being (God) can be omnipotent and omnibenevolent while evil exists.

This is often framed through the inconsistent triad of God’s omnipotence, omnibenevolence, and the existence of evil.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
182
Q

What are the three propositions that represent the problem of evil?

A
  • God is omnipotent (maximally powerful)
  • God is omnibenevolent (maximally good)
  • Evil exists
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
183
Q

What is an inconsistent triad?

A

An inconsistent triad is a set of three propositions where at most only two can be consistently true at the same time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
184
Q

What is a theodicy?

A

A theodicy is an attempt to vindicate divine goodness and providence in light of the existence of evil.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
185
Q

What do skeptics argue regarding the existence of God and evil?

A

Skeptics argue that the existence of evil is incompatible with the notion of an all-powerful and all-loving God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
186
Q

What strategy can believers use when confronted with the problem of evil?

A

Believers can ask for clarification on the meaning of terms like ‘all powerful,’ ‘all loving,’ and ‘evil’ to engage skeptics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
187
Q

What was Jesus’ approach when challenged by the Pharisees about authority?

A

Jesus responded by asking them a question that challenged their reasoning and precommitments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
188
Q

How can the problem of evil be dismissed according to some apologists?

A

Apologists can dismiss the argument by asking for a definition of evil, questioning the basis of the skeptic’s claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
189
Q

What is the significance of the statement that ‘the problem of evil is only a problem for those who believe in God’s existence’?

A

It indicates that atheists, when consistent with their worldview, do not have a problem with evil as they lack an absolute standard for good and evil.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
190
Q

Fill in the blank: An impersonalist philosophy cannot distinguish good and evil sufficiently even to raise the problem against _______.

A

[Christianity]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
191
Q

What does Kreeft and Tacelli argue about the unbeliever’s concern over evil?

A

They argue that the outrage at evil suggests awareness of a standard of goodness, implying proof of God’s existence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
192
Q

True or False: The atheist can justify moral outrage against evil within their worldview.

A

False

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
193
Q

What dual role does apologetics serve in relation to the problem of evil?

A

Apologetics defends the faith from outside attacks and encourages believers in the veracity of their faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
194
Q

What does the skeptic imply by appealing to God’s omnibenevolence?

A

The skeptic claims that if God is maximally good, there should be no evil and suffering.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
195
Q

What is the ‘Best Possible World’ Argument regarding human free agency?

A

It posits that a world with evil and free agency is better than one without evil and free agency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
196
Q

What do Kreeft and Tacelli argue about free will and morality?

A

They argue that without free will, all moral meaning disappears from language and life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
197
Q

How does the free agency argument resolve the inconsistent triad?

A

It claims that evil plus freedom is a greater good than no evil plus no freedom.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
198
Q

What types of evil does the free agency argument not address?

A

It does not address natural disasters or suffering from genetic disorders.

199
Q

What was Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz’s proposal regarding the inclusion of evil?

A

He proposed that the inclusion of evil is necessary for God’s wisdom to bring about His good plan.

200
Q

According to Leibniz, why must the actual world be the most perfect possible?

A

Because all possibilities in God’s understanding claim existence in proportion to their perfections.

201
Q

What do Keller and Lewis suggest about suffering and glory?

A

Keller suggests that the world is greater for having been broken, and Lewis states heaven will turn agony into glory.

202
Q

What does James 1:13-14 say about God and temptation?

A

It states that God cannot be tempted with evil and does not tempt anyone.

203
Q

What distinction did the Reformers make regarding God’s actions?

A

They distinguished between what God decrees (wills) and what He ordains (allows).

204
Q

What is the difference between suffering and evil?

A

Suffering comprises the reception of bad things, while evil comprises the doer of bad things.

205
Q

What does Malcolm Muggeridge argue about the elimination of suffering?

A

He argues that eliminating suffering would make the world intolerable.

206
Q

How does suffering contribute to a person’s perspective on life, according to Tim Keller?

A

For those who believe in an afterlife, suffering can become a vital experience for good.

207
Q

Fill in the blank: God causes all things to work together for good to those who _______.

A

[love God]

208
Q

What does Romans 15:1 suggest about community relations in times of suffering?

A

It suggests that the strong should bear the weaknesses of the weak.

209
Q

What is the ‘Morally Sufficient Reason’ Argument?

A

It questions how the observed evil could be the best pathway for good purposes.

210
Q

What analogy does C.S. Lewis use to describe the sinner’s perspective on God?

A

He uses the analogy of ‘God in the dock,’ implying that sinners place God on trial.

211
Q

What does the existence of suffering prompt in community relations?

A

It can prompt the activity of helping one another.

212
Q

According to Romans 12:26, what happens when one member of the community suffers?

A

If one member suffers, all the members suffer with it.

213
Q

What does the concept of ‘soul building’ refer to in the context of suffering?

A

It refers to how suffering can lead to personal growth and humility.

214
Q

What does Psalm 119:71 indicate about affliction?

A

It states that affliction can help one learn God’s statutes.

215
Q

Why did Job struggle to understand God’s actions?

A

Job tried to place God in the dock and demanded an explanation for His dealings

Job expressed a desire to present his case and fill his mouth with arguments against God.

216
Q

What does God ask Job regarding the creation of the earth?

A

Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?

This highlights Job’s ignorance of God’s omnipotent actions.

217
Q

How does God respond to Moses about mercy?

A

I will have mercy on whom I have mercy

This indicates God’s sovereignty in dispensing mercy.

218
Q

What realization does Job come to about his demands of God?

A

Job acknowledges his insignificance and refrains from further argument

Job lays his hand on his mouth and admits he has spoken too much.

219
Q

What analogy is used to describe God’s relationship with humanity?

A

God is like a potter and humanity is like clay

This emphasizes God’s authority over creation.

220
Q

What does Romans 9:20-21 state about the created and the Creator?

A

The thing molded will not say to the molder, ‘Why did you make me like this?’

This illustrates the relationship and authority of God over humanity.

221
Q

What is the inconsistent triad that can be resolved with a fourth proposition?

A

1) God is omnipotent and omniscient.
2) God is omnibenevolent.
3) There is objective evil.
4) For any evil that God allows, God has a morally sufficient reason for allowing this evil.

This fourth proposition reconciles God’s nature with the existence of evil.

222
Q

What does John Frame state about God’s wisdom?

A

Everything God does reflects his wisdom, but he is under no obligation to give us his reasons

This implies that God’s actions may remain a mystery.

223
Q

What does Isaiah 29:16 suggest about our perception of God?

A

You turn things around! Shall the potter be considered as equal with the clay?

This indicates that humanity should not question God’s authority.

224
Q

What is the stance of Scripture regarding God’s obligation to explain His actions?

A

Scripture never assumes that God owes us an explanation for what he does

This emphasizes God’s sovereignty and the mystery of His intentions.

225
Q

What does Psalm 145:3 say about God’s greatness?

A

His greatness is unsearchable

This reinforces the idea that God’s reasons may be beyond human comprehension.

226
Q

What does ‘omnipotent’ mean?

A

Possessing unlimited power

The term refers to a being that can do anything that is logically possible.

227
Q

What is the Omnipotence Paradox?

A

A philosophical dilemma about whether an omnipotent being can create a stone too heavy for itself to lift

This paradox raises questions about the nature of power and freedom.

228
Q

What is God’s aseity?

A

God is considered ‘from Himself’, meaning His actions depend solely on His nature

This concept highlights God’s independence from external influences.

229
Q

Can God create a stone too heavy for Him to lift?

A

No, He cannot deny Himself

This underscores the idea that God’s actions are consistent with His nature.

230
Q

What is the ‘Sovereignty’ Argument?

A

God is omnipotent, evil exists, and God wills evil to exist for His good reason

This argument addresses the problem of evil within the context of divine sovereignty.

231
Q

Who is Harold S. Kushner?

A

An author who suggested that God is powerless to stop evil

In ‘Why Bad Things Happen to Good People’, he argues that God’s love limits His power.

232
Q

What did John Piper emphasize regarding God’s sovereignty?

A

If we sacrifice God’s sovereignty, we sacrifice everything

Piper argues that God’s governance of evil is crucial for hope.

233
Q

How do atheists view suffering?

A

Suffering becomes destructive in a materialist context

This perspective lacks the framework to find meaning in suffering.

234
Q

What is the biblical perspective on suffering according to Psalm 23:4?

A

Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for You are with me

This verse emphasizes God’s presence during suffering.

235
Q

What is the Christian hope regarding suffering?

A

The removal of suffering and evil in the afterlife

Revelation 21:4 speaks of a future without pain or sorrow.

236
Q

What are the three propositions of the sovereignty resolution to the problem of evil?

A
  • God is sovereign
  • Evil exists
  • God wills evil to exist for His good reason
237
Q

What does Job 23:13 convey about God’s sovereignty?

A

He is unique and who can turn Him? What His soul desires, that He does

This underscores God’s ultimate authority.

238
Q

What is the significance of Lamentations 3:37-38?

A

It states that both good and ill come forth from the Lord

This reflects God’s control over all events.

239
Q

How does Augustine view the existence of evil?

A

God permits evil to exist because He can bring good out of it

This concept is discussed in Augustine’s ‘Enchiridion on Faith, Hope, and Love’.

240
Q

What does Acts 2:23 say about the crucifixion of Jesus?

A

It was delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God

This illustrates the concept of divine sovereignty even in evil actions.

241
Q

True or False: God’s sovereignty means He cannot do evil.

A

True

God is holy and cannot act against His nature.

242
Q

What should the existence of evil prompt us to do?

A

Stand back in awe regarding the magnitude of God’s glory

It invites a deeper appreciation of God’s sovereignty.

243
Q

What does the anthropological argument reason from?

A

Certain aspects of human nature to the existence of God

The argument considers immaterial attributes and moral awareness

244
Q

What are the two broad discussions within the anthropological argument?

A
  1. Immaterial attributes of humanness
  2. Moral awareness
245
Q

How would a consistent Darwinian respond to the question of non-material properties defining humanity?

A

No, as our nature is a strict continuum from previous organisms

246
Q

What principle requires that any experienced phenomenon must have a sufficient reason for its existence?

A

Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR)

247
Q

What deep intuition do people have about their nature according to the text?

A

There is something special about our makeup that separates us from animals

248
Q

What does the mind-body problem debate concern?

A

The relationship between the cerebral mechanisms of the brain and conscious thought in the mind

249
Q

What view does physicalism hold regarding conscious thought?

A

All conscious thought can be reduced to the mechanisms of a material brain

250
Q

What does the Christian dualism claim about conscious thought?

A

It arises from an immaterial soul that governs the brain

251
Q

What logical problem do Moreland and Rae pose against materialism?

A

Whether the soul is identical to the brain based on Leibniz’s Law of the Indiscernibility of Identicals

252
Q

According to Leibniz’s law, what must be true if two entities are identical?

A

Their properties should be indiscernible

253
Q

What are the three human cognitive realities highlighted in the text?

A
  1. Consciousness
  2. Abstraction
  3. Free agency
254
Q

Define consciousness in the context of human attributes.

A

The human ability of awareness

255
Q

Define abstraction in the context of human attributes.

A

The human ability to symbolically represent items within conscious awareness

256
Q

Define free agency in the context of human attributes.

A

The human ability to respond to items of conscious awareness in a non-deterministic manner

257
Q

Fill in the blank: According to the anthropological argument, if all responses can be reduced to material causes, how do we explain our desires for _______.

A

meaning and purpose in the world

258
Q

True or False: The anthropological argument suggests that human cognitive activities can be fully explained by cerebral neurology.

A

False

259
Q

What does the phrase ‘fearfully and wonderfully made’ express in the context of human uniqueness?

A

An acknowledgment of the special nature of human makeup

260
Q

How is consciousness defined?

A

An organism’s awareness of its environment

This awareness is linked to the concept of sentience.

261
Q

What is sentience derived from?

A

The Latin term ‘sentire’ meaning ‘to feel’

Sentient organisms can experience qualia such as pain and pleasure.

262
Q

What are qualia?

A

Phenomena like pain, pleasure, or redness that are subjective experiences

Qualia are not reducible to material states.

263
Q

What is the ‘hard problem of consciousness’?

A

The mystery of how neural activity gives rise to subjective experience

This problem highlights the difficulty in explaining subjective perception.

264
Q

Who is Colin McGinn and what is his argument?

A

A British philosopher known for new mysterianism, arguing that we cannot understand the causal basis of subjective conscious awareness

McGinn emphasizes the limits of human understanding regarding consciousness.

265
Q

What does the privacy of thought refer to?

A

The inability for others to access one’s thoughts through physical means

Thoughts cannot be directly uncovered or measured.

266
Q

What is the ‘what it is like’ attribute in consciousness?

A

A recognition of an organism’s subjective experience of the world

This concept is notably discussed in Thomas Nagel’s 1974 paper.

267
Q

Why can qualia not be measured like physical entities?

A

Qualia cannot be numerically tabulated as physical properties can

Emotions and thoughts are distinct from measurable physical states.

268
Q

What is intentionality in the context of mental states?

A

The directedness of the mind towards an object, or the ‘of-ness’ and ‘about-ness’ of thoughts

This concept has roots in the work of Franz Brentano.

269
Q

What is self-consciousness?

A

Awareness regarding oneself and one’s experiences

It includes both pre-reflective and reflective forms of consciousness.

270
Q

What is the distinction between physical objects and mental activities?

A

Mental activities require something outside themselves for their existence, while physical objects do not

This touches on the self-existence argument.

271
Q

What is the significance of the first-person perspective in consciousness?

A

It indicates a sense of unity and separateness from physical identity

The use of ‘I’ reflects a distinction from the body.

272
Q

How does physical dependency differ from the identity of the soul?

A

Physical things change and depend on parts for identity, while the soul remains unchanged

This suggests that consciousness cannot be purely physical.

273
Q

What is abstraction in the context of human cognition?

A

The ability to categorize items of awareness under general names

This is a key attribute that sets humans apart from other animals.

274
Q

What does Ian Tattersall argue regarding human symbolic capacity?

A

Humans can mentally dissect the world into discrete symbols and hypothesize alternate possibilities

This cognitive ability is qualitatively different from that of other animals.

275
Q

Why can’t dolphins ponder universals according to John Locke?

A

They lack the power of abstraction

This limits their ability to contemplate abstract concepts like truth or morals.

276
Q

What does the anthropic argument suggest about human attributes?

A

Human attributes like abstraction and moral reasoning require an explanation that atheism cannot provide

This highlights the uniqueness of human cognition.

277
Q

What is the free-will or free-agency argument?

A

It posits that individuals have the freedom to pursue personal goals independent of chemical causality.

278
Q

Who was Benjamin Libet and what was his contribution to the study of consciousness?

A

Libet was a researcher who demonstrated that unconscious brain processes can initiate actions before conscious awareness.

279
Q

What did Libet’s experiment suggest about the role of consciousness in volition?

A

It suggested that consciousness may not play a causal role in initiating volitional acts.

280
Q

According to Noam Chomsky, how do our choices originate?

A

Choices originate from subconscious commitments and are not made in an evaluative vacuum.

281
Q

What concept did Libet introduce that relates to the ability to choose against an initial impulse?

A

The concept of ‘free won’t’.

282
Q

What does the phrase ‘you can’t get good choices from a bad heart’ imply?

A

It suggests that one’s inclinations influence the quality of choices made.

283
Q

What is self-referential absurdity in the context of free will?

A

It is the contradiction that arises when denying free agency while engaging in reasoning about that denial.

284
Q

What is the mind-body problem?

A

The mystery of how a material brain and an immaterial soul can interact.

285
Q

How did René Descartes contribute to the discussion of mind-body dualism?

A

He espoused the idea of dualism, suggesting that the mind and body are distinct entities.

286
Q

What metaphor did Sir John Carew Eccles use to describe the relationship between the mind and the brain?

A

He likened it to a pianist playing a piano, where damage to the piano affects the pianist’s ability to play.

287
Q

What does Kreeft and Tacelli argue about materialism?

A

They argue that materialism refutes itself and undermines its own credibility.

288
Q

What does the anthropological argument suggest about human nature?

A

It posits that humanity displays both nobility and wickedness, which can be explained by the Biblical account of creation and the fall.

289
Q

How does Blaise Pascal describe the human condition?

A

He describes it as a paradox, showcasing both noble qualities and the capacity for great wickedness.

290
Q

What is the main critique of skeptics who equate man to animals?

A

They remove culpability for wickedness but lose recognition of human nobility.

291
Q

Fill in the blank: According to the text, the activities of our ‘soul’ cannot be considered identical to our _______.

A

[brain]

292
Q

True or False: The text argues that if the brain is merely a product of atoms, we can trust its conclusions.

A

False

293
Q

What does the existence of human consciousness indicate according to Kreeft and Tacelli?

A

It indicates the likelihood of life after death.

294
Q

What does the phrase ‘Mother Nature’s cosmic abortion’ refer to?

A

It refers to the idea that if death ends everything, then consciousness is rendered meaningless.

295
Q

What is the moral argument for God’s existence?

A

The moral argument claims that the existence of moral judgments requires the existence of a transcendent law giver, that being God.

296
Q

What are the two key components to establish the moral argument?

A
  • The existence of objective moral reality
  • The existence of a personal and moral God
297
Q

Fill in the blank: If objective moral values exist, then a _______ exists.

A

[personal God]

298
Q

What is the modus tollens version of the moral argument?

A
  • If a personal God does not exist, then objective moral values do not exist.
  • Objective moral values do exist.
  • Therefore, a personal God exists.
299
Q

What does ethical relativism suggest?

A

Moral judgment is dependent upon the social conditions within a cultural context.

300
Q

True or False: Ethical egoism promotes the good of the culture over individual pleasure.

A

False

301
Q

What is the ‘Law of Human Nature’ according to C. S. Lewis?

A

The idea that human beings have an innate understanding of how they ought to behave.

302
Q

What does Kant’s moral argument emphasize?

A

The existence of a Supreme Being is the only rational basis for moral law.

303
Q

What is the final end (telos) of our actions according to Kant?

A

A highest good (summum bonum).

304
Q

List the three premises of Kant’s syllogism regarding moral behavior.

A
  • Moral behavior is rational.
  • Moral behavior is only rational if justice will be done.
  • Justice will only be done if God exists.
305
Q

What is normative ethics?

A

A universal code we all must follow, recognizing an ‘ought’ that is exception-less in every culture at all times.

306
Q

According to Dostoevsky’s ‘The Grand Inquisitor’, what happens if God does not exist?

A

If God does not exist, then everything is permitted.

307
Q

What does the moral awareness refer to?

A

A rigid standard by which to judge all truth claims.

308
Q

Fill in the blank: The atheistic rebuttals to the moral argument suggest that our moral standards can exist without a _______.

A

[transcendent source]

309
Q

What is the significance of the phrase ‘moral motions’ as referred to by Francis Schaeffer?

A

It indicates how people are inherently aware of moral standards, even if they criticize them.

310
Q

What does the term ‘objective moral reality’ imply?

A

That moral values exist independently of human opinions.

311
Q

What is the Euthyphro Problem?

A

A dilemma regarding whether the pious is beloved by the gods because it is holy or if it is holy because it is beloved by the gods.

First raised by Plato in his dialogue Euthyphro.

312
Q

What are the two main implications of the Euthyphro Problem?

A
  • If something is good because God wills it, then God could will anything to be good.
  • If goodness lies outside of God, then it undermines God’s moral supremacy.
313
Q

How does Groothuis respond to the Euthyphro Problem?

A

Objective moral values have their source in the eternal character, nature, and substance of a loving, just, and self-sufficient God.

314
Q

What does the term ‘ex lex’ mean?

A

Outside of the law.

315
Q

How does the Creator/Creature distinction affect the understanding of God’s relationship to moral law?

A

God is subject to no law, while created beings are subject to God’s moral law.

316
Q

What is Kant’s summum bonum?

A

A reflection of the Supreme Being, indicating that human choice is morally right when it aligns with God’s moral law.

317
Q

What is the difference between necessary and contingent morality in the context of modal logic?

A
  • Necessary morality exists in all possible worlds.
  • Contingent morality cannot be objectively set apart as a standard.
318
Q

What is the atheist’s common response to the moral argument regarding God’s character?

A

They often cite what they consider to be reprehensible actions of God in the Old Testament.

319
Q

What is emotivism?

A

The position that all moral judgments are merely expressions of feeling.

320
Q

Fill in the blank: The Euthyphro Problem assumes that God is not God, violating the Law of _______.

A

Identity

321
Q

True or False: The Euthyphro Problem effectively undermines the moral argument for the existence of God.

A

False

322
Q

What does the moral argument ask of atheists regarding moral standards?

A

How do you justify (or ground) a moral standard without God?

323
Q

What is a common diversion tactic used by atheists when discussing morality?

A

They often respond with how it is possible for an atheist to be moral rather than addressing the basis for moral standards.

324
Q

What does the phrase ‘ipso facto’ mean?

A

By that very fact or act.

325
Q

How does the Euthyphro Problem relate to the concept of God’s changeless character?

A

God’s moral will is based on His changeless character, not on whims.

326
Q

What assurance does the idea of God being ‘Ex Lex’ provide?

A

It assures that God acts according to His nature, which is good.

327
Q

How do skeptics misinterpret the moral argument?

A

They sidestep the argument by focusing on the actions of God instead of the necessity of a transcendent lawgiver.

328
Q

What is the Is-Ought Fallacy?

A

The distinction between what ‘is’ (facts) and what ‘ought’ to be (values)

G. E. Moore referred to this as the ‘naturalistic fallacy’.

329
Q

Who is known for highlighting the Is-Ought Fallacy?

A

David Hume

Hume’s work includes ‘A Treatise of Human Nature’.

330
Q

What does Hume describe an ‘ought’ as?

A

A new sort of relation that cannot be deduced from facts

This concept is often called Hume’s guillotine.

331
Q

How can science assist in moral matters?

A

Science can help navigate or optimize moral choices once they are determined by other means

For example, providing evidence of oppression to support moral conclusions.

332
Q

What is the first atheist proposal for a moral standard?

A

An Intuitive Collective Moral Standard as Darwinian-driven

333
Q

According to Richard Dawkins, what is the source of our moral awareness?

A

Our evolutionary origins

Dawkins draws parallels between physical traits and moral senses.

334
Q

What does the concept of ‘harmony within the herd’ imply?

A

It suggests a moral standard that promotes collective well-being, but is subjective

This raises questions about whose definition of harmony is authoritative.

335
Q

What is the second atheist proposal for a moral standard?

A

Moral Standard as Utilitarian

336
Q

Who is considered the father of utilitarianism?

A

Jeremy Bentham

337
Q

What is the principle of utilitarianism according to Bentham?

A

The greatest happiness of the greatest number measures right and wrong

338
Q

How did John Stuart Mill expand upon Bentham’s utilitarianism?

A

By adding the concepts of pleasure and pain to the principle

He defined happiness as pleasure and absence of pain.

339
Q

What bold claim does Sam Harris make in ‘The Moral Landscape’?

A

The is-ought distinction is illusory

340
Q

What normative standard does Harris propose?

A

Utilitarian maximization of sentient well-being

341
Q

What is the ‘Experience Machine’ proposed by Robert Nozick?

A

A hypothetical machine that provides simulated happiness for life

It raises questions about the nature of well-being.

342
Q

What critique is made against Harris’ definition of well-being?

A

It may not account for the complexity of human experiences and motives

343
Q

What is a significant flaw in Harris’ and other atheistic moral proposals?

A

They lack a transcendent basis for moral obligations

This leads to subjective moral standards.

344
Q

What does the Bible provide in terms of ethical standards?

A

An interpretive grid for moral decision-making

This includes guidance from various books of the Bible.

345
Q

List the seven levels of insight for approaching ethical interpretations from the Bible.

A
  • Ten Commandments
  • Mosaic code
  • Proverbs
  • Ecclesiastes
  • Prophets
  • Gospels
  • Epistles
346
Q

What is the necessary and sufficient revelation for understanding God’s will according to the text?

A

The Bible

347
Q

What is the primary focus of the Cosmological Argument?

A

The existence of God based on the nature of material existence.

348
Q

According to the Cosmological Argument, what does the existence of the world require?

A

An explanation.

349
Q

What is the first question posed by Gottfried Leibniz regarding existence?

A

‘Why is there something rather than nothing?’

350
Q

What does Leibniz’s Principle of Sufficient Reason state?

A

That everything must have a sufficient reason for its existence.

351
Q

Define a contingent entity.

A

An entity that is dependent upon another entity for its existence.

352
Q

What characterizes a necessary being?

A

It does not depend on anything else for its existence.

353
Q

What is the conclusion of the Cosmological Argument regarding the universe?

A

The universe has an explanation for its existence that is grounded in a necessary being.

354
Q

What is the problem with infinite regress in the context of the Cosmological Argument?

A

It leads to the conclusion that there is no ultimate cause.

355
Q

Fill in the blank: The universe is not __________.

A

self-explanatory.

356
Q

What is the logical structure of Leibniz’s Cosmological Argument?

A
  1. Anything that exists has an explanation of its existence.
  2. The universe has an explanation of its existence grounded in a necessary being.
  3. The universe exists.
  4. Therefore, the universe has an explanation for its existence.
  5. Therefore, the explanation for the existence of the universe is grounded in a necessary being.
  6. Therefore, God exists.
357
Q

True or False: A necessary entity requires a causal explanation.

A

False.

358
Q

What does the Cosmological Argument suggest about contingent entities?

A

They require a sufficient reason for their existence.

359
Q

What is the significance of the concept of ‘efficient cause’ in the Cosmological Argument?

A

It suggests that the universe must have a cause for its existence.

360
Q

According to the Cosmological Argument, if something exists now, what must have always existed?

A

Something.

361
Q

What objection does Bertrand Russell raise against the Cosmological Argument?

A

If everything must have a cause, then God must have a cause.

362
Q

How does the Cosmological Argument respond to the objection about God needing a cause?

A

By asserting that a necessary being does not require a causal explanation.

363
Q

What does Groothuis argue regarding the nature of the Cosmological Argument?

A

That it claims every item within the physical universe is contingent.

364
Q

What is the relationship between contingent entities and the existence of God in the Cosmological Argument?

A

Contingent entities require a necessary being (God) for their existence.

365
Q

Fill in the blank: If a contingent object is caused by another, it could either be by another __________ or a necessary entity.

A

contingent object.

366
Q

What is the logical conclusion if a contingent entity is caused by another contingent entity?

A

It leads to an infinite regress.

367
Q

What does the term ‘necessary being’ imply in the context of the Cosmological Argument?

A

It cannot not exist.

368
Q

What is one way to depict the Cosmological Argument?

A

Through exclusive disjunctions: Either it exists or it does not.

369
Q

What does the term ‘cosmos’ refer to in the Cosmological Argument?

A

The universe as a whole.

370
Q

What does the Cosmological Argument conclude about the nature of existence?

A

It must be grounded in something eternal.

371
Q

What does the term ‘kalām’ mean?

A

Kalām is an Arabic term meaning ‘word’.

It is similar in meaning to the Greek expression ‘logos’.

372
Q

Who were the medieval Muslim philosophers associated with the kalām cosmological argument?

A

Al-Kindi (801 - 873) and al-Ghazali (1058 - 1111).

373
Q

What is the key difference between the kalām cosmological argument and Leibniz’s cosmological argument?

A

The kalām argument includes the idea that the universe has a beginning in time.

374
Q

What is the first premise of the kalām cosmological argument?

A

Everything that has a beginning of its existence has a cause of its existence.

375
Q

What is the second premise of the kalām cosmological argument?

A

The universe has a beginning of its existence.

376
Q

What conclusion follows from the premises of the kalām cosmological argument?

A

Therefore: God exists.

377
Q

What philosophical intuition supports the kalām cosmological argument?

A

‘From nothing, nothing comes’ (ex nihilo nihil fit).

378
Q

What does the Borde-Guth-Vilenkin (BGV) Theorem state?

A

Any expanding universe cannot be past eternal.

379
Q

Which observation is known as Olbers’ Paradox?

A

If the universe was infinitely old, then the light from every star would have time to arrive at earth, thus causing a bright night sky.

380
Q

What significant discovery did Edward Hubble make in 1929?

A

He observed a ‘red shift’ in several galaxies indicating the universe is expanding.

381
Q

What did Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson detect in 1965 that supports the big bang theory?

A

They detected the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation.

382
Q

What elemental ratio was confirmed by astronomers following the big bang?

A

The ratio of hydrogen to helium is three to one.

383
Q

What does the Second Law of Thermodynamics state about the universe?

A

The universe is moving towards a state of maximum disorder and minimum usable energy until it reaches heat death.

384
Q

What attributes are identified as necessary for a first cause of the universe?

A
  • Necessity: Uncaused, unchangeable, self-sufficient
  • Transcendence: Immaterial, omnipotent, omnipresent, eternal
  • Personal-ness: Has a will to decide
385
Q

According to the Bible, what can be understood about God’s attributes?

A

His invisible attributes, eternal power, and divine nature have been clearly seen through what has been made.

386
Q

True or False: The kalām cosmological argument suggests that the first cause must be a composite entity.

A

False.

387
Q

Fill in the blank: A first cause must be ________, self-sufficient, and not a composite entity.

A

unchangeable

388
Q

What is the primary focus of the cosmological argument?

A

The cosmological argument seeks to establish that the universe has a cause, often identified as God

This argument posits that everything that begins to exist has a cause.

389
Q

What is the first objection to the cosmological argument discussed?

A

The Impossibility of a Timeless First Cause

This objection questions how a timeless cause can initiate a temporal effect.

390
Q

According to general relativity, how does time relate to space?

A

Time behaves as a fourth dimension alongside the three spatial dimensions of length, width, and height.

391
Q

What happens to time when something is in motion?

A

Time slows down from the perspective of the moving entity.

392
Q

If the cause of the universe created time, what must it be?

A

Timeless

This implies that the cause cannot be constrained by time.

393
Q

How does the objection regarding God’s timelessness challenge His personal nature?

A

It questions how a timeless entity can initiate an act or change, like creating a contingent universe.

394
Q

What is the nature of God’s existence before the creation of time?

A

God’s existence is relational and personal, without a past-future dynamic.

395
Q

What does Scripture imply about God’s interaction with time?

A

God interacts within the temporal sequence of human activity.

396
Q

What is the second objection to the cosmological argument?

A

The Possibility of Something from Nothing.

397
Q

Who is the cosmologist that claims everything can arise from nothing?

A

Lawrence Krauss.

398
Q

How does Krauss define ‘nothing’?

A

A quantum fluctuation of information lacking space-time or matter.

399
Q

What is a key issue with Krauss’s definition of ‘nothing’?

A

It implies some laws of physics and a suitable quantum state are present.

400
Q

What is the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics?

A

It states that fluctuations in quantum fields are inherently turbulent.

401
Q

How do quantum fluctuations relate to the big bang?

A

They are theorized to have expanded their influence due to the rapid expansion during the big bang.

402
Q

What did Don N. Page criticize about Krauss’s use of ‘nothing’?

A

He argued that it assumes properties and laws that should not be present in ‘nothing’.

403
Q

What is ‘absolutely nothing’ according to Don N. Page?

A

The absence of anything not logically necessary.

404
Q

What is the difference between the Ontological Argument and the Cosmological Argument?

A

The Ontological Argument refers to God as ‘that than which none greater can be conceived,’ while the Cosmological Argument refers to God as ‘that which is farthest back.’

405
Q

What does the Greek word ‘telos’ mean?

A

End, purpose, or goal

406
Q

What is the Teleological Argument often referred to as?

A

The argument from design

407
Q

According to Aquinas’ 5th Way, how do natural bodies attain their end?

A

By design, not by chance

408
Q

What does the teleological argument propose about the universe?

A

It indicates that it was fashioned with some purpose or goal in mind

409
Q

Who proposed the watchmaker analogy?

A

William Paley

410
Q

What is the essence of Paley’s watchmaker analogy?

A

Complexity and intentional functionality imply a designer

411
Q

What is the basic structure of the teleological argument?

A
  • The cosmos displays features of intentional design.
  • If the cosmos displays design, then there must be a designer.
  • If the cosmos had a designer, then this designer must transcend the cosmos.
  • We call this transcendent designer God.
  • Therefore, God exists.
412
Q

What distinguishes the teleological argument from the cosmological argument?

A

The teleological emphasizes specificities of the cosmos, while the cosmological emphasizes contingencies

413
Q

True or False: The ontological and anthropological arguments provide moral properties of God.

A

True

414
Q

What do atheists argue can produce an appearance of design?

A

Natural selection mechanism of evolution

415
Q

What does HADD stand for?

A

Hyperactive agent detection device

416
Q

According to Justin Barrett, what is HADD fundamental to understanding?

A

Concepts of gods and spirits

417
Q

What cognitive process is referred to when individuals see patterns and draw conclusions from ambiguous data?

A

Pareidolia

418
Q

List one concern regarding the viability of the HADD inference.

A
  • Cognitive functions are not inherited; only genes are.
  • Cognitive functions do not have any selective advantages, only behavior does.
  • Cognitive functions cannot be observed, only inferred from behavior.
  • Only scant evidence exists of any connection between a given gene and a cognitive function.
419
Q

What does the teleological argument claim about the cosmos?

A

It displays features of intentional design

420
Q

True or False: The teleological argument is considered a subcategory of the cosmological argument.

A

True

421
Q

What is the role of inductive inquiry in the context of the teleological argument?

A

It is the initiator of dogmatic statements about design.

422
Q

What is the conclusion of the classical apologetic approach regarding God’s existence?

A

God exists

423
Q

Fill in the blank: The teleological argument infers that if the cosmos displays design, then there must be a _______.

A

[designer]

424
Q

What is a common assumption when hearing a twig snap in a dangerous environment, according to the atheist rebuttal?

A

Assuming some predator is intending to do harm

425
Q

What is the primary method of justification in the Classical apologetic approach?

A

Epistemic method of coherence

426
Q

What distinguishes the cosmological argument’s understanding of God?

A

God as a first cause that is uncaused

427
Q

What does the teleological argument recognize about God?

A

God as an intelligence that establishes order

428
Q

What is evidential apologetics?

A

A mode of apologetics that attempts to show that Christianity is not unreasonable rather than proving it is reasonable.

Also known as ‘Apologetics of Defense,’ focusing on factual defenses against criticism.

429
Q

What does the evidential approach highlight regarding truth claims?

A

It emphasizes that correspondence can be a qualifier for truth claims.

This means that evidence must align with reality to support claims.

430
Q

Who is a notable proponent of evidential apologetics and what is his famous work?

A

Josh McDowell, author of ‘Evidence that Demands a Verdict.’

431
Q

What is the primary purpose of evidential apologetics according to Boa and Bowman?

A

To show that Christianity is credible rather than to prove that it is true.

432
Q

What significant shift in epistemic priority occurred in Western civilization during the 17th century?

A

A move away from dependence on past authorities like Aristotle towards empirical observation and the scientific method.

433
Q

Who was Francis Bacon and what was his contribution to epistemology?

A

An English scientist and philosopher who promoted the scientific method and criticized reliance on past authorities.

434
Q

What is the title of Bacon’s work that introduced his inductive approach?

A

‘Novum Organum.’

435
Q

How did Bacon view the previous methods of the Greeks?

A

He believed they were primarily contemplative and did not advocate rigorous experimentation.

436
Q

What is the difference between demonstrative and probable evidence according to Joseph Butler?

A

Probable evidence admits of degrees and cannot produce certain proof, unlike demonstrative evidence.

Butler claimed that ‘Probability is the very guide of life.’

437
Q

What did Joseph Butler’s ‘Analogy of Religion’ propose?

A

It suggested that religious realities are analogous to physical realities and can be understood through empirical approaches.

438
Q

Who is John Warwick Montgomery and what is his view on knowledge?

A

A modern evidential apologist who claimed that facts must be self-interpreting for knowledge to be attainable.

439
Q

What does Montgomery say about the relationship between language and the world in the Scriptures?

A

The Scriptures presume a correspondence view of truth, where language and reality are congruent.

440
Q

Fill in the blank: Evidential apologetics primarily seeks to show that Christianity is _______.

A

credible.

441
Q

True or False: The evidential approach seeks to establish Christianity as the only true religion.

A

False.

442
Q

What analogy does Bacon use to illustrate his empirical approach to reality?

A

He compares it to ships venturing out of familiar waters into the vast Atlantic.

443
Q

What does the term ‘cumulative case for faith’ refer to in Butler’s apologetics?

A

The idea that compiling more evidence increases the certainty of Christian truth claims.

444
Q

What is the teleological argument for God’s existence?

A

It posits that scientific efforts indicate cosmic design as an initial premise of a theistic proof that concludes with a transcendent Designer, whom we call God.

445
Q

What are the two rebuttals to the recognition of design mentioned in the text?

A
  • Survival benefit (HADD) for those assuming intelligent agents behind phenomena
  • Natural selection producing organisms that only appear designed
446
Q

Can the scientific method objectively reveal intelligent design?

A

The lesson explores whether human intuition can be warranted and if design intuition can be substantiated by science.

447
Q

What is intuition?

A

The ability to understand something immediately, without the need for intricate analysis.

448
Q

According to Thomas Reid, what is a waste of time regarding intuition?

A

Requiring elaborate analysis to uncover what our gut intuition already knows.

449
Q

What are ‘first principles’ in the context of intuition?

A

Fundamental expectations by which to live common life that must be accepted without analytical strings attached.

450
Q

What is the main limitation of science?

A

Science can only utilize data that is observable, measurable, and repeatable.

451
Q

What does fallibilism refer to?

A

The view that a person could be wrong in a belief yet justified in holding that belief.

452
Q

What is specified complexity according to William Dembski?

A

Criteria to identify mechanisms in life indicating an intelligent cause, requiring both complexity and specificity.

453
Q

What are the two major criteria for design proposed by Dembski?

A
  • Complexity with a very low probability
  • Specificity that is intentionally specified ahead of time
454
Q

Give an example of specified complexity.

A

The chemical structure of DNA, which is complex and contains information necessary for cellular functions.

455
Q

What is the Anthropic Principle?

A

It states that the universe is finely tuned for human habitability.

456
Q

What is the multiverse theory?

A

The idea that there exist an infinite number of universes, each with its own properties and laws.

457
Q

What is Occam’s razor?

A

The principle that the best explanation is one that makes the fewest assumptions.

458
Q

What concerns does cosmologist George Ellis raise regarding the multiverse hypothesis?

A

It may weaken the nature of scientific proof.

459
Q

What is a critique of the multiverse theory according to Groothuis?

A

It is a reaction against the Designer hypothesis, indicating that physicists acknowledge the universe’s fine-tuning.

460
Q

What statistical observation is made about cosmological constants?

A

No one of the approximately 50 cosmological constants can be predicted from the others; they are independent.

461
Q

Who was Antony Flew and what did he conclude?

A

A philosopher who moved from atheism to deism due to the evidential weight of cosmic fine-tuning.

462
Q

What is the main argument of the Rare Earth hypothesis?

A

The origin of life and evolution of biological complexity required an improbable combination of astrophysical and geological events

Proposed by Peter Ward and Donald Brownlee in their book ‘Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe’ (2000)

463
Q

Who were the authors of the book that introduced the Rare Earth hypothesis?

A

Peter Ward and Donald Brownlee

Their book was published in 2000

464
Q

What is the principle of mediocrity?

A

The belief that Earth is a typical rocky planet in a typical planetary system located in a non-exceptional region of a common galaxy

Popularized by Carl Sagan and Frank Drake in the 1970s and 1980s

465
Q

State the Rare Earth equation as proposed by Ward and Brownlee.

A

N = N* • ne • Is • fp • fpm • fi • fc • fi • fm • fj • fme

N represents the number of Earth-like planets in the Milky Way having complex life forms

466
Q

What do N* and ne represent in the Rare Earth equation?

A

N* is the number of stars in the Milky Way; ne is the average number of planets in a star’s habitable zone

467
Q

What is the estimated number of habitable planets in the Milky Way?

A

Approximately 500 billion

This estimate is based on multiplying N* and ne

468
Q

List the first three ‘p’ expressions in the Rare Earth equation.

A
  • Is = the fraction of stars in the galactic habitable zone
  • Ip = the fraction of stars in the Milky Way with planets
  • Jpm = the fraction of planets that are rocky rather than gaseous
469
Q

What does the fraction ‘fi’ represent in the Rare Earth equation?

A

The fraction of habitable planets where microbial life arises

470
Q

True or False: The Rare Earth equation suggests that complex life is likely to be common in the universe.

A

False

The equation suggests that the probability of complex life is very low

471
Q

Fill in the blank: The probability of all accommodating features for animal life to converge on one planet is ______.

A

utterly prohibitive

472
Q

What is the implication of the Rare Earth equation regarding Darwinian evolution?

A

It raises questions about how life on Earth can exist under a strict Darwinian paradigm

473
Q

What does the fraction ‘fme’ represent in the Rare Earth equation?

A

The fraction of planets with a sufficiently low number of extinction events

474
Q

Who was Antony Flew and what change in belief did he experience?

A

A philosopher who moved from atheism to deism due to the argument from intelligent design

475
Q

What does the fraction ‘fj’ represent in the Rare Earth equation?

A

The fraction of planetary systems with large Jovian planets

476
Q

What significant conclusion can be drawn from the Rare Earth hypothesis?

A

Complex extraterrestrial life is an improbable phenomenon and likely to be rare

477
Q

What is the significance of cosmic fine-tuning in the context of the Rare Earth hypothesis?

A

It contributed to Flew’s transition from skepticism about theism to belief in deism

478
Q

What is the term that refers to life beginning from nonliving substances?

A

Abiogenesis

Abiogenesis is also known as chemical evolution.

479
Q

Who recognized the concept of irreducible complexity in cellular mechanisms?

A

Michael Behe

Behe discussed this in his book ‘Darwin’s Black Box’.

480
Q

What analogy does Michael Behe use to explain irreducible complexity?

A

Mousetrap

A mousetrap cannot function if any one part is missing.

481
Q

List some components necessary for cellular function as per Behe’s argument.

A
  • Control center for replication and metabolism in the nucleus
  • Energy supply by the mitochondria
  • Protein construction by RNA transcription and transference of instructions to the ribosomes
  • Waste disposal by the lysosomes
  • Food and waste storage by the vacuoles
  • Selective membrane transfer
  • Internal transportation by the endoplasmic reticulum
482
Q

What is the Darwinian mechanism primarily concerned with?

A

Natural selection

Natural selection explains how traits better suited for survival are passed on.

483
Q

Define gene pool.

A

The set of all genes in a species or population.

484
Q

What are mutations in the context of evolution?

A

Copy errors in genes that increase trait options.

485
Q

True or False: Darwin was aware of genetic mutations.

A

False

Darwin’s theory was later expanded upon by Neo-Darwinism which includes genetic mutations.

486
Q

What is the difference between microevolution and macroevolution?

A

Microevolution involves small changes within species; macroevolution explains the origin of new species.

487
Q

How does natural selection contribute to the gene pool?

A

It amplifies traits that result in greater reproductive success.

488
Q

What did Gerd B. Müller discuss at the Royal Society conference?

A

The shortcomings of the Darwinian mechanism in explaining the origin of life systems.

489
Q

List the three issues that evolution could not explain according to Gerd B. Müller.

A
  • Origin of phenotypic complexity
  • Origin of anatomical novelty
  • Origin of non-gradual modes of transition
490
Q

What does Douglas Axe argue about the complexity of proteins?

A

It illustrates selection’s inability to invent.

491
Q

Fill in the blank: Darwin’s theory primarily explains the _______ of species, not the arrival.

A

survival

492
Q

What is the role of copy errors in evolution?

A

They provide genetic variation necessary for natural selection.

493
Q

What is the main critique of the Darwinian model regarding the origin of complex life functions?

A

It cannot adequately explain the transition from microevolution to macroevolution.

494
Q

True or False: All components of a cell must be present for it to function.

A

True

The absence of any component leads to failure in cellular function.

Worldview (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions