EIGHTEENTH CENTURY POLITICAL FORMATIONS Flashcards
AURANGZEB DIED IN?
1707.
FORT ST DAVID LOCATION?
TAMIL NADU.
REASONS FOR THE CRISIS OF THE EMPIRE AND THE LATER MUGHALS?
- AURANGZEB HAD DEPLETED THE MILITARY AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES OF HIS EMPIRE BY FIGHTING A LONG WAR IN THE DECCAN.
- LATER MUGHALS COULD NOT KEEP A CHECK ON THEIR POWERFUL MANSABDARS.
- NOBLES APPOINTED AS GOVERNORS (SUBADARS) OFTEN CONTROLLED THE OFFICES OF REVENUE AND MILITARY ADMINISTRATION (DIWANI AND FAUZDARI) AS WELL GIVING THEM EXTRAORDINARY POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND MILITARY POWERS OVER VAST REGIONS OF THE MUGHAL EMPIRE.
- PEASANTS AND ZAMIDARI REBELLIONS CAUSED BY PRESSURE OF MOUNTING TAXES ADDED TO THESE PROBLEMS.
- RULER OF IRAN, NADIR SHAH, SACKED AND PLUNDERED THE CITY OF DELHI IN 1739 AND TOOK IMMENSE AMOUNTS OF WEALTH.
- AFGHAN RULER AHMAD SHAH ABDALI, INVADED NORTH INDIA FIVE TIMES BETWEEN 1748 AND 1761.
- EMPIRE WAS FURTHER WEAKENED BY COMPETITION AMONGST GROUP OF NOBLES WHO WERE DIVIDED INTO TWO GROUPS- IRANIS AND TURANIS.
- LATER MUGHAL EMPERORS WERE PUPPETS IN THE HANDS OF EITHER ONE OR THE OTHER OF THESE POWERFUL GROUPS.
MUGHALS EMPERORS ASSASSINATED BY THEIR NOBLES WERE?
FARRUKH SIYAR (1713-1719) AND ALAMGIR 2 (1754-1759).
MUGHALS EMPERORS BLINDED BY THEIR NOBLES WERE?
AHMAD SHAH (1748-1754) AND SHAH ALAM 2 (1759-1816).
MUGHAL EMPIRE’S STATES OF EIGHTEENTH CENTURY WAS DIVIDED INTO?
THREE OVERLAPPING GROUPS.
1. STATES THAT WERE OLD MUGHAL PROVINCES LIKE AWADH, BENGAL AND HYDERABAD.
- ALTHOUGH EXTREMELY POWERFUL AND QUITE INDEPENDENT, THE RULERS OF THESE STATES DID NOT BREAK THEIR FORMAL TIES WITH THE MUGHAL EMPEROR.
2. STATES THAT HAD ENJOYED CONSIDERABLE INDEPENDENCE UNDER THE MUGHALS AS WATAN JAGIRS.
- THESE INCLUDED SEVERAL RAJPUT PRINCIPALITIES.
3. STATES UNDER THE CONTROL OF MARATHAS, SIKHS AND OTHERS LIKE THE JATS. THEY HAVE SEIZED THEIR INDEPENDENCE FROM THE MUGHALS.
ASAF JAH, MURSHID QULI KHAN AND SA’ADAT KHAN HAD ZAT RANK OF?
ASAF JAH AND MURSHID QULI KHAN HELD A ZAT RANK OF 7,000 EACH.
SA’ADAT KHAN’S ZAT WAS 6,000.
FOUNDER OF HYDERABAD?
NIZAM-UL-MULK ASAF JAH.
NIZAM-UL-MULK ASAF JAH (1724-1748) WAS ONE OF THE MOST POWERFUL MEMBERS AT THE COURT OF THE MUGHAL EMPEROR_________.
FARRUKH SIYAR.
NIZAM-UL-MULK ASAF JAH WAS ENTRUSTED FIRST WITH THE GOVERNORSHIP OF _______, AND LATER GIVEN THE CHARGE OF THE ________.
AWADH.
DECCAN.
TRUE/FALSE
1. NIZAM-UL-MULK ASAF JAH APPOINTED MANSABDARS AND GRANTED JAGIRS.
2. HE WAS STILL A SERVANT OF THE MUGHAL EMPEROR.
3. HE COULD NOT RULE INDEPENDENTLY AND HAS TO SEEK DIRECTIONS FROM DELHI.
4. MUGHAL EMPEROR HAD TO CONFIRM THE DECISIONS ALREADY TAKEN BY THE NIZAM-UL-MULK ASAF JAH.
- TRUE.
- TRUE.
- FALSE- HE RULED QUITE INDEPENDENTLY WITHOUT SEEKING ANY DIRECTION FROM DELHI OR FACING ANY INTERFERENCE.
- FALSE- MUGHAL EMPEROR MERELY CONFIRMED THE DECISIONS ALREADY TAKEN BY THE NIZAM-UL-MULK ASAF JAH.
WHO WERE NAYAKAS?
INDEPENDENT TELUGU WARRIOR CHIEFS.
THE STATE OF HYDERABAD WAS CONSTANTLY ENGAGED IN A STRUGGLE AGAINST THE MARATHAS TO THE WEST AND WITH INDEPENDENT TELUGU WARRIOR CHIEFS (NAYAKAS) OF THE PLATEAU.
THE AMBITIONS OF NIZAM-UL-MULK ASAF JAH TO CONTROL THE RICH TEXTILE PRODUCING AREAS OF THE COROMANDEL COAST IN THE EAST WERE CHECKED BY THE ______ WHO WERE BECOMING INCREASINGLY POWERFUL IN THAT REGION.
BRITISH.
________ WAS APPOINTED SUBADAR OF AWADH IN 1722.
BURHAN-UL-MULK SA’ADAT KHAN.
BURHAN-UL-MULK ALSO HELD THE COMBINED OFFICES OF ______,________ AND _______.
SUBADARI, DIWANI AND FAUJDARI.
TRUE/FALSE
1. BURHAN-UL-MULK TRIED TO DECREASE MUGHAL INFLUENCE IN THE AWADH REGION BY REDUCING THE NUMBER OF OFFICE HOLDERS (JAGIRDARS) APPOINTED BY THE MUGHALS.
2. HE INCREASED THE SIZE OF JAGIRS, AND APPOINTED HIS OWN LOYAL SERVANTS TO VACANT POSITIONS.
3. THE ACCOUNTS OF JAGIRDARS WERE CHECKED TO PREVENT CHEATING AND THE REVENUES OF ALL DISTRICTS WERE REASSESSED BY OFFICIALS APPOINTED BY THE NAWAB’S COURT.
4. HE SEIZED A NUMBER OF RAJPUT ZAMIDARS AND THE AGRICULTURALLY FERTILE LANDS OF THE AFGHANS OF ROHILKHAND.
- TRUE
- FASLE- HE ALSO REDUCED THE SIZE OF JAGIRS, AND APPOINTED HIS OWN LOYAL SERVANTS TO VACANT POSITIONS.
- TRUE
- TRUE
TRUE/FALSE
1. THE STATE (AWADH) DEPENDED ON LOCAL BANKERS AND MAHAJANS FOR LOANS. IT SOLD THE RIGHT TO COLLECT TAX TO THE HIGHEST BIDDERS.
2. THESE “REVENUE FARMERS” (IJARADARS) AGREED TO PAY THE STATE A FIXED SUM OF MONEY.) LOCAL BANKERS GUARANTEED THE PAYMENT OF THIS CONTRACTED AMOUNT TO THE STATE.
3. IN TURN, THE REVENUE FARMERS WERE GIVEN CONSIDERABLE FREEDOM IN THE ASSESSMENT AND COLLECTION OF TAXES.
4. THESE DEVELOPMENTS ALLOWED NEW SOCIAL GROUPS, LIKE MONEYLENDERS AND BANKERS, TO INFLUENCE THE MANAGEMENT OF THE STATE’S REVENUE SYSTEM, SOMETHING WHICH HAD NOT OCCURRED IN THE PAST.
ALL ARE TRUE.
MURSHID QULI KHAN WAS APPOINTED AS THE GOVERNOR OF BENGAL BY THE MUGHALS.
TRUE/FALSE.
FALSE. HE WAS APPOINTED AS THE NAIB DEPUTY TO GOVERNOR OF THE PROVINCE.
ALTHOUGH NEVER A FORMAL SUBADAR, HE VERY QUICKLY SEIZED ALL THE POWER THAT WENT WITH THAT OFFICE.