egyptian nationalism Flashcards
wafd
The Wafd Party (“Delegation Party”; Arabic: حزب الوفد, Hizb al-Wafd) was a nationalist liberal political party in Egypt. It was said to be Egypt’s most popular and influential political party for a period from the end of World War I through the 1930s.
when was ward established?
The Wafd party was an Egyptian nationalist movement that came into existence in the aftermath of World War I. Though it was not the first nationalist group in Egypt, it had the longest lasting impact. It was preceded and influenced by smaller and less significant movements which evolved over time into the more modern and stronger nationalist Wafd Party. One of these earlier movements was the Urabi Revolt led by Ahmed Orabi in the early 1880s. This uprising was fought against the ruling powers of the Egyptian Khedive and European interference with Egyptian affairs. Saad Zaghloul, the future creator and leader of the Wafd Party, was a follower of Orabi, and participated in his revolution.
wwi and wafd
The actual party began taking shape during World War I. Saad Zaghloul began forming a group of individuals who shared his views, and did not include the assistance of the people. Saad Zaghloul and his contemporaries formed the Wafd (which literally means “delegation”) near the end of the war. They presented themselves with Zaghloul as their representative to Reginald Wingate, the British governor in Egypt. They told Wingate that the main goal of the Wafd was the immediate termination of the British occupation of Egypt. This was what was originally told to the governor but he was not informed of their intention to use the Paris Peace conference to plead their case to the world powers. Zaghloul had created a delegation that involved representatives of most of the political and social groups of Egypt. Since it was full of so many different groups, it could not yet truly be considered a political party but more of a coalition. The Wafd had formed a constitution outlining the ways that they wish to govern Egypt.
british protectorate and wafd
The Wafd was now becoming a true party and one with complete support of the people. The delegation made its way to Paris only to hear that U.S. President Woodrow Wilson supported the British Protectorate of Egypt. Though at this point the British were still in control, the Wafd was effectively leading the people of Egypt. In 1920, the British protectorate ended and the Wafd was placed in control of Egypt. The party rapidly became the dominant political organization in the country and was the governing party (albeit in a subordinate role to the executive power of the king) through most of the liberal period which came to an end with the rise of Gamal Abdel Nasser.
Saad Zaghloul
Saad Zaghloul (Arabic: سعد زغلول; also: Saad Zaghlûl, Sa’d Zaghloul Pasha ibn Ibrahim) (1859 – 23 August 1927) was an Egyptian revolutionary, and statesman. Zaghloul was the leader of Egypt’s nationalist Wafd Party. He served as Prime Minister of Egypt from 26 January 1924 to 24 November 1924.
reginald wingate and the wafd
On 13 November 1918, thereafter celebrated in Egypt as Yawm al Jihad (Day of Struggle), Zaghlul, Fahmi, and Sharawi were granted an audience with General Sir Reginald Wingate (‘Wingate Pasha’), the British High Commissioner. They demanded complete independence with the proviso that Britain be allowed to supervise the Suez Canal and the public debt. They also asked permission to go to London to put their case before the British Government. On the same day, the Egyptians formed a delegation for this purpose, Al Wafd al Misri (known as the Wafd), headed by Saad Zaghlul. The British refused to allow the Wafd to proceed to London.
time and context late 1910’s
1919 treaty of Versailles going on. Wilsonian 14 points – manifesto for national self determination
in Egypt and ME, they were aware of both of the above. the awareness of peace conference to determine what would happen at end of war.
wafd a delegation with national goals and wingate
wafd a delegation with national goals. They saw the high commissioner Wingate, demanded independence and asked if they could represent Egypt at the peace talks. He said no and said who are you to claim the right to speak on behalf of Egyptians? You’re just some elite guys.
who were the elite circles who dominated Egyptian governments
The elite circles who dominated Egyptian governments were largely from turko-circassion groups. They were pale, spoke Turkish not Arabic and didn’t identify with Egyptians. The wafd was set up to allow native Egyptians to rise to any level.
What did this delegation do when Wingate said no but also said they had not rights to speak on behalf of Egyptian nation?
Took a petition round Egypt to get support of national determination. There was also this petition being circulated in Syria in preparation for the visitation by the king crane commission.
key nationalist leaders
Key nationalists - sa’d zaghul – premier nationalist leader. Al-Afghani (he was from Persia or Iran- Shiite country and Afghani - from wanted wider acceptance in Shiite and Sunni to disguise Persian and Shiite routes took on al-Afghani names) and abduh. All studied at AL-Azhar. Reformists like abduh (leading islamic modernist is the me. Islam should be reformed to fit with technology and science) and rise of nationalism were closely linked. Wide discussions abut state and society.
all studied at al-azhar. Afghani father of islamic modernism.
reaction to petition
· Petition received a large amount of signatures
. – Wingate refused to budge and said only in London could Egypt’s future be discussed. It was an internal matter to be discussed by the British empire not peace conference
Who went to the peace talks?
prince faisal son of Hussein went with te Lawrence and delegation from other Arab provinces under British control at the end of the war were allowed to go to the peace conference. But pothers not. to French conference on behalf of. This signifies how others were allowed to go but Egypt were not. These delegates in Egypt – wafd – were arrested and exiled.
urabi revolt
native egyptians rising up against rule of turko-circassion groups. ulama led as argued by meir hatina
Demonstrations 1919
1919 demonstrations across Egypt. Egyptian revolution. Shaarawi. Classless demos. Rioting and violence targeting British. Al-Azhar remained focal point for opposition and protest. Women played a key role from march the 16th. Huda Shaarawi wife of ali shaarawi. She led a demo of wafdist women central committee and had a standoff with Britain forces. She took advantage of the fact the soldiers would not open fire on women and stood in front of them and refused to move. As a result, the british moved to allow her past.
1919-1922
Several years of negotiations and demos and unrest until 1922
28/2/1922 britiain and protectorate
Britain unilaterally decided to on 18/2/1922 and declared protectorate was over. 1922 … Egypt as an independent state
… but Britain would still control 4 things:
1. Communications within the British empire
(including Suez Canal)
2. Egyptian defense
3. Privileges granted to foreigner / minorities - could claim european citizenship and status - capitulations. Could have separate laws, courts etc.
4. Sudan – Britain wanted to maintain control over Sudan which had been ruled as part of Egypt since early in the 19th century –
1923 Constitution
Set up a parliamentary democracy modelled on europe. Main wish to restrict power of wafd.
2 (largely) elected chambers: Deputies and Senate. King had a veto on all bills passed unless they could be passed a second time with a 2/3 majority. A lot pf power given to king yet he hated sharing any power with the people - not just british and the British
- Written with goal of limiting Wafd popular power
- Significant power to King, who used it regularly to suppress nationalist parties
- Women important in campaigning for the political cause given no rights, no votes despite their involvement in demonstrations
political upheaval following constitution
Period of significant political upheaval:
- wanted to get full independence
- No Parliament fulfilled their 4-year term
- Wafd won the majority of free elections, but their attempts to govern were hampered by the King and his allies and (at times) the British. Not all elections were free. Parliament dismissed, constitution suspended so they wouldn’t win or a different party governed instead. Is this the start of democracy? Yes, but also no as wafd only governed 7 years out of this 29 years even though they won every free elections