Economic Pricing (III) Flashcards

1
Q

Costing GHG reduction (Abatement)

A

Step 1 : Clauc;ate the annualized LCC per unit of service for two technologies providing identical service

Exp. LCC for electric cra nad gas car, both have the same size and usig 15,000 km / yr

Step 2: Calculate the direct and indirect annual GHG emissions pf each.

Step 3: Divide difference un annualized LCC by difference in annual GHG emission to gove cost of GHG reduced = $ / tCO2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Problems with McKinsey type analizys

A

Qiality of service is assume identical

Risk is assumed identical
Exp. Long payback investemnt and new technologies aee higher invenstemnt and failure risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Intangible cost (Definition)

A

Incorporating quality and risk difference, usually cause higher expected cost.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Direct Rebound (Definition)

A

Increased efficiency that lowest the operating cost of an energy service and stimulates an increase demand for it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Indirect Rebound (Definition)

A

If energy efficiency investment is profitable it increase income and lowest production cost- both which can increase enrgv used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rebound effect

A

Another challenge for energy efficiency, standard energy efficiency analysis ignores rebound effects

Includes Direct rebound and Indirect Rebound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Demand of energy service

A

Rising income, shifting consumer preference and innovations that in part benefit from efficiency gains.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Technical energy efficiency potential

A

There are fisrt law efficiency gains available from 100 % adoption of most efficient technologies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Economic energy efficiency potential

A

The potential forst law efficiency gains from 100 % adoption of technologiest with lowest LCC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dispatchable (Definition)

A

Electricity can be generated when desired
Exp. large hydro with reservoir, gas turbine)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Non-Dispatchable (Definition)

A

Electricity generator subject to nature’s variability.
Exp. Wind, Solar, run-of-river

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Compare renewables options

A

By life-cycle cost of electricity (LCOE). This method indicates that there is no extra value to dispachable in comparison to non-dispachable, yeat dispachable are more valuable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Two methods to account for dispatchability when comparing options

A
  1. Incorporate energy storage costs for non-dispatchable (wind solar) when calculate worth LCOE, and then compare them to dispatchable

2.Track the “ market value” of each KWh from dispatchable to non-dispatchable to calculate net benefot of each

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly