Eating Disorders Flashcards
How has the DSM’s approach to eating disorders evolved over time?
DSM-I: Focused on Bulimia Nervosa.
DSM-IV: Created separate chapters for Anorexia and Bulimia Nervosa.
DSM-5: Renamed the chapter to “Feeding and Eating Disorders” and described these disorders as a persistent disturbance in eating or eating-related behavior that impairs physical health or psychosocial functioning.
What does the historical perspective on anorexia suggest about its existence over time?
Versions of anorexia and disordered eating have been around and studied for a long time, with cases described from the Middle Ages to recent centuries.
How has the conceptualization of eating disorders evolved over time?
Historically, eating disorders were referred to as “nervous atrophy” or “anorexia hysteria.” Over time, explanations shifted from spiritual causes to factors such as family dynamics, genetics, hormonal influences, and environmental pressures, along with societal ideals like perfectionism and the value placed on thinness.
What are three childhood-related eating disorders introduced in DSM-5?
Pica: Persistent eating of non-nutritive substances (e.g., dirt or hair).
Rumination Disorder: Repeated regurgitation of food.
Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID): Failure to meet appropriate nutritional or energy needs.
What are the key features and limitations of DSM-5’s eating disorder chapter?
Disorders include Anorexia Nervosa (AN), Bulimia Nervosa (BN), Binge-Eating Disorder (BED), and Other/Unspecified.
Emphasizes distressing behaviors linked to weight and body shape.
Obesity was not included despite some proposals.
Focuses on grouping childhood disorders with adult presentations for a lifetime perspective.
What was the rationale behind the major additions to eating disorders in DSM-5?
Pica, Rumination, and ARFID: Previously in the DSM-IV chapter “Disorders Usually First Diagnosed during Infancy, Childhood, or Adolescence.” DSM-5 integrated them to adopt a lifespan perspective.
Binge-Eating Disorder (BED): Promoted from a condition for further study to reduce reliance on “eating disorder NOS” (not otherwise specified), which was being used as a de facto code for BED.
What is the literal meaning of “Anorexia Nervosa”?
The term means a lack of appetite due to nervousness.
How is Anorexia Nervosa expressed and misunderstood?
Individuals may not see themselves as underweight, though others might express concern.
Despite being underweight by clinical standards, they may fear gaining weight.
Caloric intake is often restricted, and individuals may perceive themselves as painfully thin.
Severity isn’t always apparent and is specified using subtypes (e.g., restricting or binge-eating/purging types).
Specifiers help interpret how common factors in eating disorders are expressed.
What factors are considered for assessing the severity of anorexia nervosa in adults?
BMI score, clinical symptoms, functional disability, and need for supervision are all taken into account.
BMI cutoffs are used by the DSM to specify severity levels.
An average person with anorexia nervosa (AN) is 25-30% below typical body weight.
What are some limitations of using BMI as a measure for anorexia diagnosis?
BMI is a crude indicator: Athletes may have low BMI due to low body fat, without having an eating disorder.
BMI < 18.5 alone is not enough for diagnosis; it’s only an indicator.
The severity scale has been criticized by some researchers for lacking consistent value in diagnosis.
How does Bulimia Nervosa (BN) relate to Anorexia Nervosa (AN)?
BN and AN can co-occur, and some people with AN may transition to BN.
BN is not about restricting calories but about compensating for food intake through purging, fasting, or exercise.
Unlike AN, individuals with BN are often within a normal weight range and might hide their behaviors related to binge eating.
What behaviors characterize Bulimia Nervosa (BN)?
Binge eating: Consuming more food than usual within a short period.
Compensatory behaviors: Purging, fasting, exercising, or using laxatives to avoid weight gain.
A sense of loss of control during episodes.
These behaviors typically occur at least once a week for 3 months.
What are the specifiers for Bulimia Nervosa (BN)?
Partial or full remission indicates if the individual still meets diagnostic criteria.
Severity is measured by the number of compensatory behaviors per week:
Mild: 1-3 episodes.
Moderate: 4-7 episodes.
Severe: 8-13 episodes.
Extreme: 14+ episodes.
Why is it important to distinguish between Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and Bulimia Nervosa (BN)?
There is fluidity between the two conditions, and behaviors can overlap.
BN involves compensating for food intake, while AN focuses more on restriction.
Careful evaluation helps ensure the behavior is correctly attributed to the appropriate disorder, preventing misdiagnosis.
What are the specifiers for remission and severity in Bulimia Nervosa (BN)?
Remission:
Partial remission: Some diagnostic criteria for BN are still met, but not all. For example, binge eating or compensatory behaviors may still occur, but with reduced frequency or intensity.
Full remission: No diagnostic criteria for BN have been met for a sustained period, though the individual remains at risk for relapse due to the long-term nature of eating disorders. Monitoring is recommended, as behaviors may reappear over time.
Severity: Measured by the number of inappropriate compensatory behaviors per week:
Mild: 1-3 episodes.
Moderate: 4-7 episodes.
Severe: 8-13 episodes.
Extreme: 14 or more episodes.
What are the key differences and similarities between Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and Bulimia Nervosa (BN)?
Differences:
Eating/weight: AN involves extreme dieting with weight below normal, while BN involves binge eating and compensatory behaviors, typically with normal weight.
View of disorder: Individuals with AN often deny the problem and take pride in diet and control, whereas those with BN are aware of their problem but feel ashamed and secretive.
Feelings of control: AN individuals feel comforted by rigid self-control, while BN individuals experience distress from a lack of control.
Similarities:
Self-evaluation: Unduly influenced by body weight and shape in both disorders.
Comorbidity: Individuals with AN may also binge and purge; those with BN may have a history of AN.
SES/age/gender: Both disorders are prevalent in high socioeconomic status (SES), young females.
What are the limitations of categorical frameworks when comparing disorders like Anorexia and Bulimia?
Tables can give the appearance of simplicity, but in reality, a continuum may better capture the complexities of these disorders.
Similarities:
Both involve risk factors and self-evaluation concerns about weight and shape.
Dissimilarities:
Whether the person feels pride in their weight.
The level of control they believe they have over their weight.
Whether they mask compensatory actions.
Note: These frameworks are useful but don’t capture the fluid boundaries seen in personality and eating disorders.
What is the neurobiological impulse-control model of eating disorders (ED)?
This model frames eating disorders along a spectrum between restrictive and impulsive behaviors.
Restrictive side: Linked to traits like perfectionism, cognitive rigidity, attention to detail, and anxiety (e.g., Anorexia Nervosa).
Impulsive side: Involves high arousal, risky behaviors, and loss of control (e.g., Binge-Eating Disorder, Bulimia Nervosa).
Brain areas involved:
Restrictive: DLPFC, OFC, MPFC, ACC (frontal brain regions).
Impulsive: Dorsal striatum, amygdala, cerebellum, hypothalamus.
Genetic markers: COMT, BDNF, 5HT2A.
Key concept: Anxiety is reframed as pathodysmorphia—a phobia focused on how the body feels and functions.
What does the 2012 neurobiological impulse-control model suggest about eating disorders?
Eating disorders exist on a continuum between strong and weak impulse control.
This model emphasizes impulse control as the fundamental issue, influencing both Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Anorexia Nervosa (AN).
It was proposed before DSM-5, advocating that neurobiological findings should be interpreted through this lens.
How do impulse control levels influence eating disorders in the neurobiological model?
Lack of Impulse: Leads to loss of control over eating, resulting in BN or binge eating at the extreme.
Strong Impulse Control: Leads to rigid control over appetite and physiological responses, contributing to AN or binge-purge behaviors.
What other features and ongoing debates are associated with the neurobiological impulse-control model?
Perfectionism is linked to restricted eating in AN.
Alcohol overconsumption may reflect poor impulse control or excessive food consumption.
The model highlights pathodysmorphobia, a phobia about how the body feels, as an important anxiety-related feature.
There is debate about viewing eating disorders as a continuum, which the DSM framework does not fully accommodate.
What are the diagnostic criteria for Binge Eating Disorder (BED) in DSM-5?
Recurrent episodes of binge eating: Eating a large amount of food within 2 hours with a loss of control (similar to Bulimia, Criteria A).
At least 3 associated symptoms, such as:
Eating more rapidly.
Eating until uncomfortably full.
Eating when not hungry.
Feeling embarrassed, disgusted, depressed, or guilty afterward.
Occurs weekly for 3 months, without compensatory behaviors (unlike BN).
Specifiers: Partial or full remission, and severity levels (similar to BN).
What are the controversial views regarding the inclusion of BED in DSM-5?
Agree: BED needs formal recognition with clinical utility backed by sufficient evidence.
Disagree: Critics argue that the diagnosis is too broad, potentially overpathologizing normal eating.
Impact: In the US and Australia, BED has become the most commonly diagnosed eating disorder since its inclusion in DSM-5.
What are the prevalence rates of BED across demographics?
3.5% of women: Most common in early adulthood.
2% of men: Most common in midlife.
1.6% of adolescents.
2014 Study: Raised concerns about overdiagnosing normal eating behaviors through the inclusion of BED, but ultimately argued against this concern.
How is Binge Eating Disorder (BED) described from the perspective of lived experience?
A binge is not pleasurable but mindless and repetitive, with hands moving from mouth to food.
Afterward, individuals feel awful, confronted by empty food packets and a sense of shame that can be overwhelming.