Duress Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

R v Graham

A

1) Did the defendant act as he did because, as a result of what he reasonably believed had been threatened, if he did not act he would have good cause to fear the person issuing the threat would kill or cause GBH?
2) Would a sober person of reasonable firmness, sharing the characteristics of the defendant, have responded thus?
3) Could the defendant have taken evasive action?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Hasan

A

1) There must be threat of death or serious injury
2) Threat must have been made to the defendant, his family or someone for whom the defendant would regard themselves as responsible
3) Perception of threat and response are assessed objectively
4) There must have been no evasive action the defendant could reasonably have taken
5) Cannot use defence where due to association with criminals, the defendant ought to have foreseen the risk of being subjected to threats of violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

DPP NI v Lynch

A

Threat to property is not sufficient

Defence not available for murder or attempted murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Valderrama-Vega

A

If there are several threats, as long as one is of serious injury or death, it will be sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Shayler

A

May feel responsible for complete strangers in certain circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Bowen

A

Unusually low IQ could not be taken into account in assessing if response to threat was reasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Abbott

A

The crime carried out must be proportional to the threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Cole

A

Must be a nexus between threat and crime committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Shepherd

A

Cannot rely on threats to which he has voluntarily laid himself open unless trouble were to materialise unexpectedly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Martin

A

Duress of circumstances (necessity)

1) Must reasonably believe that he had good cause to fear that death or serious injury might result unless he acts
2) Would a sober person of reasonable firmness, sharing the characteristics of the accused, have responded to the situation in the same way?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Abdul Hussein

A

Threat need not be accompanied by command to commit a particular crime
Available where ‘imminent’ harm threatened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Dudley & Stevens

A

Not a defence to murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly