Consent Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

R v Richardson v Irwin

A

Once raised by D, burden of proof is on prosecution to show that victim did not consent and that the defendant did not believe in the consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AG’s Reference No 6 of 1980

A

Most fights will be unlawful regardless of consent (minor struggles may differ)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Brown

A

Cannot consent to anything more than battery, unless sport, chastisement or reasonable surgery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Meachen

A

Consent available as defence where harm is greater than ABH as long as D did not intend to cause harm and did not see the risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Collins v Willcock

A

Implied consent to battery if everyday contact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Barnes

A

Implied consent to battery in properly conducted sporting games, unless so obviously violent as to not be regarded as an instinctive reaction, error or misjudgement in the context of the game

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Billinghurst

A

Sports players are deemed to have consented to force of a kind which could reasonably be expected to happen during a game

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Brown

A

Consent not allowed as a defence to sexual gratification or personal adornment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Wilson

A

Wound caused by branding became infected - akin to personal adornment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Dica

A

HIV positive - had sex with and infected 2 women - held that HIV constituted serious harm and consent did not apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Emmet

A

Suffocation during sex was violent conduct that was beyond what could be consented to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Slingsby

A

Not aware that there was a risk of harm (caused by ring) - no MR for OAPA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Jones

A

Implied consent if horseplay is everyday occurrence between defendant and victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Hopley

A

Parent may use reasonable force to chastise a child (would now be challenged under Article 3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly