Actus Reus Flashcards
R v White
Factual causation - ‘but for’ test
R v Benge
D’s acts need not be the only cuase
R v Hughes
D’s actions must be significant (not minimal)
R v Pagett
D’s actions must be the operative cause
Free, informed, deliberate act may break chain of causation
R v Smith
Medical negligence will not break chain of causation unless so overwhelming as to make the original wound merely part of the history
Wound must be the operating and substantial cause
R v Cheshire
Medical negligence would have to be so independent of D’s actions and so potent in causing death that D’s actions are rendered insignificant
R v Hayward
Thin skull rule (weak heart valve)
R v Blaue
Thin skull rule (religious beliefs)
R v Roberts
Act of victim has to be so daft an unexpected that no reasonable man could have foreseen it to break chain of causation
R v Williams v Davies
Timidity or neuroticism on the part of the victim would make extreme action foreseeable
R v Holland
Refusing medical treatment does not break chain of causation
R v Dear
Reopening wounds caused by D and committing suicide will not break chain of causation
R v Smith
An omission, without a duty will not create an offence
R v Dytham
Police office has a duty to intervene and prevent harm
R v Pitwood
Contractual duty to act to prevent carriages from crossing the railway tracks