diminished responciblity Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

who must prove the defence

A

the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what acts cover dr

A

s2 homicide act 1952 amended by
corners justice act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what defence did it replace

A

provocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what happens to the cases of provocation in turms of dr

A

they are no longer binding but can be persuasive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what happens if the prosecution agree with the defence of dr

A

the judge can accept it and it won’t get to the jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what can the prosecution do is the d pleads insanity

A

argue it’s dr

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the four things that must be proven for dr

A

amf
stops d from being competent(3things)
comes from RMC
which provides explanations for act/omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what case was amf established in

A

r v burne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what’s the definition of amf

A

where the d mental functioning is so different from that of an odanary human beings the the reasonable man would term it abronmal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

where is Rmc defined

A

not in statute but in cpc guidelines in accepted classifications list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

give examples of an Rmc

A

asberges
mental deficiency
alcoholism
epilepsy
schizophrenia
post natal depression
battered woman’s syndrome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what must the rmc stop the d from doing

A

ability to understand nature of conduct
from a rational judgment
exercise self control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

give an example of something that would stop the d from understanding the nature of conduct

A

delusions
learning difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

give an example of something that would stop the d from forming a rational judgement

A

battered woman’s syndrome
paranoid personality disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

give an example of something that would stop the d from exercising self control

A

psychopath

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how is substantial defined in r v lloyd

A

not total but not minimal or trivial

17
Q

how is substantial defined in golds

A

important or weighty

18
Q

why may the d not be able to understand the nature of conduct

A

d in an automatic state/has delusions
they don’t understand what they are doing
eg learning difficulties

19
Q

why may the d not be able to form a rational judgement

A

they may know nature of conduct but can’t form rational decisions
eg schizophrenia

20
Q

why may the d not be able to exercise self control

A

phycopath can’t control impulses

21
Q

what must d prove the amf does

A

provides an explanation for act or omission

22
Q

what kind of connection must be between amf and killing

A

some causal connections

23
Q

what on its own cannot be the basis of defence of dr and a case example

A

intoxication

24
Q

how will the jury consider if there is both dr and intoxication

A

see if the rmc would cause killing without intoxication

25
Q

what’s Ads

A

alcohol dependency syndrome

26
Q

how is ADS different

A

is there is involuntary intoxication it can be dr

27
Q

what happened in r v osbourne

A

d had adhd and was smoking weed
got into fight and killed someone with plank
no dr defence as it was the weed that caused him to do it not adhd

28
Q

what happened R V Byrne

A

d was a sexual psychopath and killed and mutilated girl
he had dr as he had uncontrollable impulses