Developmental Study - Lee et al Flashcards

1
Q

What is an individualistic culture?

A

Societies which emphasise the individual, their rights, attitudes and needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a collectivist culture?

A

Societies which emphasis the group, its decisions and needs and the duties of the individual to that group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is cross-cultural research?

A

Research which investigates psychological concepts in people from different cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the aims?

A

To see if Chinese and Canadian children would differ in how they rate truth-telling in pro-social settings (where something has done something good) and anti-social settings (where someone has done something bad)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Examples of physical story

A

Picking up litter in school yard, tidying up classroom during break, tearing pages from library book, scribbling on page from library book

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Examples of social story

A

Money for another child to buy lunch, only for another child to go on trip, pushing over a child because of a skipping rope, pushing over a new child they didn’t like

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the strengths of a cross-sectional study?

A

Variety, generalisable, quicker than longitudinal, less risk of people dropping out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the weakness of a cross-sectional study?

A

Participant variables, individual differences/participant variables between age groups, snapshot of development, larger sample needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the IVs?

A

Nationality of the child, age of the child, how the character behaved in the story, what was affected by the behaviour of the child in the story

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the two nationalities used?

A

Chinese and Canadian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the age categories?

A

7, 9, and 11

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the two ways that the character behaved in the story?

A

Prosocial and antisocial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was affected by the behaviour of the child in the story?

A

Physical or Social

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How many children were from China?

A

120 (20 in each group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How many children were from Canada?

A

108 (36 in 7, 40 in 9, 32 in 11)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What city in China did they come from?

A

Hangzhou

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What city in Canada did they come from?

A

Fredericton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How were the story conditions allocated?

A

Randomly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How were they seen?

A

Individually

20
Q

What was explained to them first?

A

The rating scale

21
Q

What did the children use when answering the questions?

A

Words, symbols or both

22
Q

How many stories did they listen to?

A

4 of each physical or social story

23
Q

How was counterbalancing used?

A

Through randomly allocating stories to one of two orders and then giving about half of the children one order and the rest of the children the other order.

24
Q

What does the pro-social - truth telling mean?

A

Doing a good deed and telling the truth about it

25
What does the pro-social - lie telling mean?
Doing a good deed and lying about it
26
What does the anti-social - truth telling mean?
Doing a bad thing and telling the truth about it
27
What does the anti-social - lie telling mean?
Doing a bad thing and lying about it
28
What did the analysis of data focus on?
The culture the children came from, the children's ages, and the particular story they were responding to
29
What were the results of story one (pro-social behaviour/tell the truth about it)?
No significant difference, Canada consistent ratings over age groups, China viewed telling the truth less positively as age increased
30
What were the results of story two (pro-social behaviour/tell a lie about it)?
Canada children viewed lie telling as negative but less negative as age increases, Chinese children aged 7 rated the lie negatively but age 11 rated it postively
31
What were the results of story three (anti-social behaviour/tell the truth about it)?
No significant difference, all rated truth telling in an anti-social situation positive
32
What were the results of story four (anti-social behaviour/tell a lie about it)?
Culture less important, negative ratings increase with age in both cultures
33
What are some qualitative data?
Nearly 1/2 of Chinese children who had rated truth telling negatively for pro-social behaviour (story 1) as the person "wanting" praise Around 1/3 of Chinese children believed the person shouldn't leave their name when doing a good deed (this explains their positive rating for story 2)
34
What is the key quantitative finding?
70% of Chinese 11-year-olds rated lying positively in prosocial stories compared to just 25% of Chinese 7-year-olds
35
What are the conclusions?
Moral development differs in different cultures as a result of socio-cultural norms and practices - not just a result of cognitive development
36
What ethical guidelines were upheld?
Consent (by parents and their schools), right to withdraw (we can assume), protection from harm (stories weren't particularly upsetting)
37
What ethical guidelines were broken?
May have been uncomfortable about being alone in the room with the researcher (or could have been upset if they did not understand the story or about the stories where a child was rushed to the ground)
38
Internal Reliability points
Standardised procedure used with the same instructions given to all children and each read 4 stories
39
External reliability points
Sample size for each group was fairly large so should represent a consistent effect
40
Internal (construct) validity points
Demand characteristics may have been an issue as children may have worked out they were supposed to say telling the truth was good and lying was bad. Also may have had an issue with translating the story might not have understood the story
41
External (ecological) validity points
Fairly realistic situations that the children would be familiar with so ecological validity should be high. But what they say is right/wrong may not be what they would do in that sitation in real life
42
Ethnocentrism points
Should not be because they compared two very different cultures - but could be cultural bias in the stones used which might make them biased towards Canadian children - only two countries compared
43
How this study links to the nat/nur debate?
Suggests that morality can be taught and affected by the culture we grow up in
44
How this study links to free/det debate?
Suggests our morality is determined by where we grow up
45
How this study links to the red/hol debate?
Could be more holistic as it suggests age and culture both have an impact on our judgement of lying being right or wrong
46
How this study links to the ind/sit debate?
Whilst age and stage of moral development is an individual factor, the culture we grow up in and also influences our morality is situational