Developmental Study - Chaney et al Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the background of this study?

A

The Skinner Box

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the positive reinforcement in the Skinner box?

A

Food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the negative reinforcement in the Skinner box?

A

Stop shock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is asthma?

A

A chronic condition that affects about 1 in 10 people. Even though there are treatments, some people use their inhaler wrong (particularly children)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is positive reinforcement?

A

When a behaviour is encouraged by reward. Eg. giving a child a sweet for being polite

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is negative reinforcement?

A

When a behaviour is encouraged by removing unpleasant stimulus eg. lifting a ban on the TV because a child has completed their homework

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the aim of the study?

A

To see if operant conditioning could be used encourage children to want to use their inhaler and when they do; use it correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the research method?

A

Field experiment and self-report because it takes place in their own environment (home)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the experimental design?

A

Repeated measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the sample?

A

32 children (22 boys and 10 girls) from Australia aged between 1.5 and 6 years (75% of the children were over 3) - on average, they have had asthma for 2 years - they were using the Aerochamber inhaler or the Breath-a-Tech inhaler

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How was the sample obtained?

A

They were recruited on a random basis from seven paediatrician or GP clinics - within 51km radius of Perth, Western Australia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the IV?

A

Whether the child is using the Funhaler or the normal device

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the DVs?

A

The questionnaires which were designed to measure the children’s behaviour (frequency that the child Tok the medicine and any problems had with delivery of medicine) and the attitudes of the parents and the children towards medication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the positive reinforcement on the Funhaler?

A

Whistle and spinner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the negative reinforcement on the Funhaler?

A

Asthma symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the initial data collected?

A

Questions about current inhaler, measure correct adherence, current frequency of medication, problems with medication, attitudes towards medication

17
Q

What was the data collected during the study itself?

A

Parents given Funhaler to sue with instructions, and parents were contacted randomly and asked if they had used the Funhaler the previous day

18
Q

What did the children do during the study?

A

Used Funhaler instead of normal inhaler

19
Q

What was the final data collected?

A

Questionnaire to measure adherence, how frequently the child was medicated and parent and child attitudes to Funhaler

20
Q

What was the conclusions?

A

The Funhaler led to increase in usage and correct usage (4 breaths per cycle). Parents also were less likely to give up and result to a nebuliser

21
Q

What ethics were upheld?

A

No harm and we can assume there was a debrief

22
Q

Why was it better to use a repeated measures design?

A

All the children got the benefit of using the Funhaler rather than just some

23
Q

Internal reliability point

A

Same questionnaire, length of time using Funhaler was the same, Funhaler was the same for all children

24
Q

External reliability points

A

Only 32 children involved - raises questions about how consistent the effect was

25
Q

Internal Validity points

A

Socially desirable rather than true responses are possible (parents don’t want to admit that they are giving their children the inhaler incorrectly) and improved use could also be the result of novelty of the Funhaler

26
Q

External Validity points

A

Difficult to apply to all cultures and the other age ranged, and children use the inhaler at home so this increases the ecological validity

27
Q

Ethnocentrism points

A

All children were from Australia, will children from all cultures fringe the design of the Funhaler appealing?

28
Q

How does the study link to usefulness?

A

Education, parenting, health sector vs limited ages, countries other illness

29
Q

What is the link to Ind/Sit debate?

A

Indivuduall differences in child/parent attitudes towards inhaler but sit of the inhaler influencing behaviour

30
Q

What is the link to the Nat/Nur debate?

A

Children natured into using the Funhaler

31
Q

What is the link to the Free/Det debate?

A

Usage determined by the inhaler

32
Q

What is the link to Reduc/Holism debate?

A

Maybe ignoring parenting style