Developmental Psychology Flashcards
What was the first theory and what study is it based on
Erikson’s Theory of Identity Development
- Based on extensive research using case studies, studying a range of people in different cultures
e. g. Denmark, Germany, wealthy American adolescents, Sioux Indians and Martin Luther King
What did Erikson believe in?
= identity development occurs through a combination of the effects of psychological process, which take place in the individual (psycho) and the experiences of individuals during their lifetime, particularly through their interaction with other people.
KEY TERMS:
- psychological process
- individual
- experiences
- interaction with others
Identify the stages in Erikson’s Theory
- Trust vs Mistrust - 0-1 infancy
- infants are dependent on others for food, warmth and love and trust that others will provide these needs
- needs are met consistently and responsively = secure attachment with caregiver, learn to trust others
- failure to bond = mistrust of the world around them - Autonomy vs Shame & Doubt - 1-3 toddler
- learn to talk, walk and feed themselves = less dependent, autonomous
- success at greater independence = self-confidence, self-control, mistakes are easily corrected
- overprotection/disapproval from parents = shame and doubt on ability to be independent - Initiative vs Guilt - 3-6 early childhood
- social and motor skills become highly developed
- dilemma = to balance the wish to achieve more and take more responsibility, while accepting parental control and discipline without guilt - Industry vs Inferiority - 6-12 middle childhood
- industry is competence and is achieved through learning at school, relationships with friends and peers increase
- children who are rewarded for their industry = develop a sense of competence
- failure to achieve competence = feeling of inferiority - Identity vs Role Confusion - 12-18 adolescence
- to answer ‘who am i?’, an adolescence must integrate all resolutions to the earlier crisis to achieve a sense of identity, incorporating all elements of self
- failure = role confusion, indecision, avoidance of commitment
* a major crisis that must be resolved for a successful transmission into adulthood - Intimacy vs Isolation - 18-40 early adulthood
- achievement of intimacy with another person is important
- failure to develop sense of identity = young adult is incapable of forming an intimate relationship, therefore is isolated - Generativity vs Stagnation - 40-65 middle adulthood
- the main focus is to work and the maintenance of family relationships
- success for both areas = sense of accomplishment and leaving a legacy for the future
- failure = self-centredness and stagnation - Integrity vs Despair - 65-death late adulthood
- time to reflect on one’s contribution and view it either as positive + satisfactory, or unsatisfactory + disapointing
- fulfilled life = view death with a sense of integrity
- unfulfilled life = death will be despaired and even feared
Describe Erikson’s Stages
- Erikson viewed Identity Development as a progression through these sequential stages
- Each stage corresponds with a different period in the lifespan
- In each stage the individual has to deal with a different identity (psychosocial) crisis that is normal for people in that stage in life
Define psychosocial crisis
A social dilemma an individual faces in adjusting to society, each crisis involves a struggle between two opposing tendencies (one which comes from our internal personal needs and the other from the demands of society), and both are experienced by the person.
Describe what Erikson said about psychosocial crisis’?
Impact on us:
- our personality and interactions with others are shaped by how we deal with others or resolve psychosocial crisis.
- our internal needs (what we want from ourselves) change as we get older, as well as the expectations and demands made by other people (family, teachers, society) - both put pressure on us to change
Progression:
- stages can overlap, meaning two crisis may occur at the same time
- the age at which we go through each stage can vary, but the order in which people progress is fixed
- it is necessary to experience each crisis (not necessarily to resolve them) before proceeding to the next stage.
Resolution & Outcome:
- each crisis needs to be resolved for a healthy identity development to occur (there can be a positive/good or negative/bad outcome depending on the individual’s ability to resolve each crisis)
- successful resolution of each crisis will be in favour of the positive characteristic (e.g. trust out of trust vs mistrust, and integrity out of integrity vs despair)
- If a crisis isn’t resolved, Erikson warned that it would have a negative effect on the individual’s social relationship
- each crisis is not a ‘catastrophe’, but rather a turning point in life
Outline how Erikson’s Theory can be useful
- useful for understanding the major changes that occur throughout the lifespan
- Describes the changes that occur throughout the entire lifespan, unlike other theories
- Describes how healthy personality development is achieved
Outline limitations/criticisms of Erikson’s Theory
- lacks experimental evidence to support the theory (developed from case studies, not scientifically controlled research)
- doesn’t consider how socio-cultural influences can have differing effects on males and females (he focussed on males)
- critcisms about ‘identity’ being found in adolescents - argued that many people struggle with identity in adulthood
- lack of mentioning the importance of ‘work’, which is considered to be a major part in identity formation
What is the second theory and what studies is it based on?
Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development
- based on studies using cross-sectional and longitudinal research methods
Define moral development and moral dilemma
The gradual development of an individual’s concept of what is right and wrong. It includes the development of a conscious, religious values and social attitudes.
A social problem which has two or more solutions, each of which is ‘wrong’ in some way
Describe Kohlberg’s Cross-Sectional studies
Background:
- he compared groups of people at different ages.
His assumption:
- if the children in the various age groups differed consistently from each other in their moral reasoning for a particular dilemma, then it was likely this difference was due to the difference in age
- he obtained evidence of this
Describe Kohlberg’s Longitudinal study
He followed a group of 10-16 year olds for nearly 20 years to test how people of different ages use moral reasoning.
He presented each participant with various moral dilemmas, and they were required to judge the ‘wrongness’ or ‘rightness’ of the behaviour of the people involved with the dilemmas.
He was interested in the kind of thinking participants used to arrive at their decisions and the reasons they gave of their judgements.
What did Kohlberg find?
He concluded that the development of moral reasoning progresses sequentially through a series of developmental stages.
- each stage represents a more complex way of thinking.
He also found that not all individuals…
- develop the moral reasoning associated with each stage
- go through each stage of their lifetime
What are Kohlberg’s 3 levels of moral development?
- Preconventional level (0-9 years)
- stage 1: Obedience and Punishment Orientation (OPO)
- stage 2: Naively Egotistical Orientation (NEO) - Conventional level (9-15 years)
- stage 3: Good Boy/Nice Girl Orientation
- stage 4: Law-And-Social-Order-Maintaining Orientation - Postconventional level (16+)
- stage 5: Legalistic-Social-Contract Orientation
- stage 6: Universal-Ethical Orientation
Describe level 1 - the ‘Preconventional Level’
Ages 0-9
Children have little/no awareness of moral behaviour
They see rules as something they have to follow because authority figures tell them to
Involves Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment Orientation (OPO)
- children follow rules to avoid punishment.
- behaviour is based on fear not what is ‘right’/’wrong
- by the end of stage 1, children show signs of moral behaviour and concern for others
Involves Stage 2: Naively Egotistical Orientation (NEO)
- children start to think they’ll be rewarded if they do something ‘right’
- they will do something ‘right’ to please others, rather than because they think it is the right thing to do
- some concern for the view of others