Determinants and Causation - Part 2 Flashcards

1
Q

What is a determinant?

A

Any factor or variable that can affect the frequency of disease occurence in a population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does understanding the determinant help us to do?

A

If we understand the determinant we can then possibly interven

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does it mean that associations can be causal or not?

A

Two outcomes can have association because they are determined by a single determinant, however, just because they are associated, does not mean that the one causes the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are confounders?

A

Uncontrolled and unmeasured differences among groups that alternatively explain the outcome

  • differences that can account for what you are seeing, which you arent accounting or controlling for in your experiment and therefore it is missed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

4 methods for developing a causal hypothesis?

A
  1. Method of difference
  2. Method of agreement
  3. Method of concomitant variation
  4. Method of analogy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a method of difference?

A

If a disease occurs in two situation at different frequencies, any factors that are different between the situations could be causal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is method of agreement?

A

If a factor is common to a number of different circumstances in which a disease is present, then the factor may be the cause of the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is method of concomitant variation?

A

If the frequency or strength of a factor varies continuously with the frequency of the disease, it may be a cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Method of analogy

A

Compare the pattern of disease under study with that of a disease that is already understood

  • some cancers caused by a virus, treat new cancer as though caused by a virus to determine type
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a risk of using method of analogy?

A

Tend to depend upon a checklist already known, which the disease is not a method of analogy to other disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Koch’s 4 postulates

A
  1. Microorganism must be found in abundance in all individuals suffering from the disease, but not healthy individuals
  2. The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased individual and grown in pure culture
  3. The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a healthy individual
  4. The microorganism must be re-isolated from inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Problems with Koch’s postulates

A
  1. Healthy carriers exist
  2. Sometimes you cant culture an agent in the lab
  3. Need a particular extrinsic factor for microbe to cause disease when introduced to healthy individual…. Ethics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the goal of triangulation?

A

Not to conclusively “prove” cause and effect relationships, but rather to collect sufficient evidence, using all of the available tools and data to reach a verdict of causation which can then justify and direct management action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly