Design economics and cost planning Flashcards
Can you briefly identify the different Risk allowances as detailed in NRM 1?
“(a) Design development risks – an allowance for use during the design process to provide forthe risks associated with design development, changes in estimating data, third party risks (e.g. planning requirements, legal agreements, covenants, environmental issues and pressure groups), statutory requirements, procurement methodology and delays in tendering.
(b) Construction risks – an allowance for use during the construction process to provide for the risks associated with site conditions (e.g. access restrictions/limitations,
existing buildings, boundaries, and existing occupants and users), ground conditions, existing services and delays by statutory undertakers.
(c) Employer change risks – an allowance for use during both the design process and the construction process to provide for the risks of employer driven changes (e.g.
changes in scope of works or brief, changes in quality and changes in time).
(d) Employer other risks – an allowance for other employer risks (e.g. early handover, postponement, acceleration, availability of funds, liquidated damages or premiums
on other contracts due to late provision of accommodation, unconventional tender action and special contract arrangements)
What was your advice to the client following the LCC exercise?
I advised the client that by increasing the sustainability levels from bronze standard to silver aspects, the capital cost would increase by approximately £8k per unit, however the additional cost could be subsidised by the Scottish Governments Greener Homes Incentive which is £2k per unit. So whilst the client would be paying an extra over capital cost of £6k per unit they would save money in operating costs by having more energy efficient units. The payback period was 20 years. From a LCC aspect there was negligible change from a LCC perspective, so the benefit was only realised from a capex perspective. There was a betterment in the Gold and Passivhaus LCC analysis however the capital investment was too great despite the long term value of the investment.
How did you completed the LCC?
I completed a cost analysis on the varying sustainability levels, looking at bronze, silver, gold and passivhaus technical standards (addressing section 6 and 7 energy and sustainability) whilst also looking at the health and wellness aspect in terms of area provision. I ran a capital cost estimate for each. I then used this to inform my LCC analysis/study over 60 year to compare the LCC impacts of each technical standard. I profiled the repair and maintenance requirements of components over the study term – using manufacturer data sheets for example – to plot those events and using the discount factor from BSRIA data sheets, was able to profile each across the 60year study period. I then liaised with client to obtain operational costs (incl energy bills) to determine this value over same period.
What was the lifespan for your maintenance costs?
60 years, but you can run it over a shorter term.
What factors need to be taken into account when using secondary source data?
Costs may need updated to account for location and time factors, this can be through the use of the tender price index which charts the movement of tender prices.
What is the ground classifications you mentioned?
Inert - used on site
Contaminated non hazardous - £150/m3
Contaminated hazardous - £500/m3
What are the main drawback of using historical data?
- Market Trends
- Out of date
- Not having a complete knowledge of the historical data
- Inaccuracies and inconsistencies
What is a good wall to floor ratio?
Depends on the type of asset, however 0.4 and below is considered to be efficient
What are the key contents of your cost plans?
Building works Services External Works Prelims Contingencies Design Development Exclusions
On your Inverclyde project how did you go about advising the Client on using a risk register vs a percentage-based contingency?
Held a risk workshop with the client and design team
Identified different risk types across the 4 sites (design, pre-construction, construction, H&S)
Reviewed the probability of the risk
Impact of the risk on cost time and quality
I allocated a possible cost effect
Then Allocated a risk factor = Probability x (Cost + Time + Quality)
Weighted Cost Effect = Probability x Possible Cost Effect
We also had a general allowance for construction contingency of 2.5%
What is whole life costing?
The whole life cost includes the life cycle cost plus other costs such as the cost of the site, cost of financing the project, etc.
Whole life costs therefore relate to the overall development, whereas life cycle costs relate to the building only.
Can you explain what metrics can be used to discuss design efficiency?
The Metrics vary depending on the type of project, however there are various cost metrics, area metrics, ratios that can be used to identify design efficiency
Can you briefly explain the measurement rules for risk as detailed in NRM 1?
Risk avoidance Risk reduction Risk transfer Risk sharing Risk retention
Which NRM is applicable to cost planning?
NRM1 – Order of Cost Estimating and Cost Planning
What are the different ways that one can prepare a cost estimate?
(unit / elemental / GIFA)
When would you use NRM 1, NRM 2 and NRM 3?
NRM 1 - Order of Cost Estimating and Cost Planning
NRM 2 - Detailed Measurment of Building Works
NRM 3 - Building Maintenance Works