✅design arguments based on reason Flashcards
What is Descartes ontological argument?
A supremely perfect being, therefore he possesses all perfections, including existence, which is a perfect in itself. Existence is a predicate of a perfect being. Therefore GOD EXISTS.
What is a predicate
To predicate something is it ascribe to something a quality or property
What is Descartes triangle?
Existence cannot be separated fro god, like a triangle cannot be separated form 3 angles. It is not less impossible to conceive a god, that is, a being of supremely perfect,
What are the benefits of Descartes argument
It cannot be applied to objects in space, therefore can’t use gaunilos island,
Only god can have absolute perfection, there cannot be 2 absolutes.
What does Kant say about Descartes argument
If you have a triangle, then it must have three sides, but if you do NOT have a triangle, you neither have it’s three sides, not it’s three angles.
If you accept there is a god, then it is logical to accept also his existence, but oi DOMT HAVE TO ACCEPT THAT THERE IS A GOD.
Existence isn’t a predicate, you can describe something perfectly , and then add that it exists,n
Who says existence is not a predicate?
Kant
Kant argument
Existence is not a predicate. Adding reality to a concept doesn’t make it any better,
“A hundred real Thaler doesn’t contain the least Connie more than a hundred possible Thaler”
Who argues against Kant?
Davies. He said there is a difference between real and not really Thaler. The real Thaler you can spend. They are real.
What does Bertrand Russell think?
Argues that anselms use on the notion of necessary existence represents a syllogism. Existence cannot be a re-educate, as if it was, it could be contracted than men exist. Santa Claus was a man, therefore Santa Claus exists.
Existence is not a property of things, it’s a numerical concept.
What is a syllogism?
The interference of one proposition from two premises.
Eg all men were Greek, all men are mortal, therefor all Greeks are mortal.
What does David Hume think?
Argued that the description of a thing can contain every detail possible, but we must go beyond the description itself to determine where a thing exists or not,
A think cannot “define itself into existence”, no matter how perfect it is.
Who said you can’t “define it into existence”
Hume
Strengths of the ontological argument
The conclusion is certain Provides a starting point for everyone Aquinas supports it No empirical evidence You cannot define god, have to accept the idea of god Necessary existence
Who said “there is nothing in the mind that that is not first in the senses”
Aquinas
How did Stephen Davis challenge kants criticism?
Existence does add something to the definition, a real hundred Thaler.