Dependency theory Flashcards
what are the core arguments of dependency theory?
- criticism of modernization theory
1. underdev = result of integration into world markets dominated by advanced nations (external factors)
2. capitalism -> inequalities and social conflict
3. hierarchy in world economic system = dependent relations and unequal exchange
what are the roots of dependency theory?
- structuralist school of UNECLA (Prebisch/Singer Thesis)
- marxism
what is the Prebisch-Singer thesis?
- UNECLA structuralist school
- latin america not benefitting from trade due to unfavourable terms of trade
- > exporting low value primary products and importing high value industrial/consumption products
- long-run: decline in terms of trade: exports cheaper and imports more expensive
According to the Prebisch-Singer thesis, what are the origins of unfavourable terms of trade?
colonialism
- integrated colonies into the world market in particular way that they export cheap good and import expensive goods -> distorted (externally-oriented) economy
- remain economically dependent
what is classical marxism?
- traditional/agrarian society -> feudalism -> capitalism -> revolution -> communism
- process -> conflict (winners and losers) (capital owners vs workers)
what did dependency take from marxism?
- capitalism -> progress by developing relations of production and destroying traditional society
- level of analysis: economic systems
what is the later marxist view?
applies classical marxism to imperialism
- capitalism -> int division of labour -> distorted economy
- uneven development
- backwardness: result from integration in world markets
- imitation to catch up = impossible
- unit of analysis: world capitalist system
- local bourgeoisie = advance country elites (comprador bourgeoisie)
What is the Gunder Frank Dichotomy?
metropoles (core) vs. satellites (periphery)
- from LA + Mexico studies
- cause of underdev: extraction of surplus from satellites by metropoles
- backwardness: result of capitalism (external trade relations)
- autonomous dev = impossible -> so better so sever linkages
- crude theory (no autonomy for politics)
What does Cardoso and Falleto + Evans argue?
- internal class structures (coallitions) are linked to external structures
- politics (coallitions) influence outcomes (role of the state)
- possibility of limited dependent development
- > by allying domestic and international capital
- Evans’ 3 way alliance: domestic capital + foreign capital + state
what does O’Donnell argue are the political consequences of dependence?
- economically limited : exclude popular interests and lower classes
- rise of bureaucratic authoritarianism (exclusionary)
(no democracy)
what is world systems theory
unit of analysis: world system
Wallerstein
core + semi-periphery + periphery
semi periphery = limited development
what do dependency and world systems theory share?
- structuralist
- analyse capitalist dev
- level: world system
- unequal exchange
what are the strengths of dependency theory?
- corrects 1-sided approach of modernization (also external factors)
- consistent historical analysis based on historical materialism
what are the weaknesses of dependency theory?
- state focus (methodological territorialism)
- implicit assumption: if linkages with west are broken -> some dev possible
- underestimate importance of internal and political factors (role of agency)
what are examples of dependency theory in practice? (policies)
NIEO (external)
ISI (internal)
de-linkage