Definitive impressions and ridge resorption Flashcards
Bone changes (alveolar resorption)
- Magnitude
- Site and pattern
- Time relations
- Influencing factors
- Problems
Magnitude
Approx x4 as much resorption of mandible as maxilla (inconvenient)
Site and pattern: mandibular resorption
Residual ridge further lingual anteriorly, further buccal posteriorly - in at the front and out at the back --> class II pxs overbite would be heightened due to resorption Need to make teeth on top of strongest point of ridge
Site and pattern: maxillary resorption
Residual ridge is displaced palatally in all cases
Can put teeth roughly where they were before
Time relations
Main amount of bone loss over the first year
Immediate dentures will become loose
Shrinkage slows down and becomes less significant after 4-5 years
Influencing factors
Systemic: osteoporosis
Local: retained roots preserve alveolar bone, as do biocompatible implants
-careful of caries on retained roots
Denture induced: some evidence that denture wearing contributes to resorption (if only wearing denture on uppers)
Problems
Denture insecurity
-ill-fitting dentures (no flange, immediate dentures)
-outside the neutral zone
Occlusal problems: cross-bite
Pain:
-mucosa traumatised by compression against sharp, resorbed bony ridges (irregular resorption)
-relative movement of mental foramina will result on p on nerve as it exits
Appearance: lack of support of soft tissues (angular cheilitis - distance between rest & bite becomes bigger_
The molar crossbite
When buccal cusps of upper molars sit inside of buccal cusps of lower molars
-in edentulous pxs often due to palatal resorption of upper arch & buccal change of lower ridge due to resorptive pattern
Requirements of working impressions
Ridge without undercuts (or minimal undercuts)
-rigid impression material in close fitting special tray
Ridge with large undercuts
-elastic impression material in spaced special tray
-often young edentulous pxs
What is an undercut?
The contour of a cross-section of a residual ridge of dental arch that would prevent placement of a denture or other prosthesis
Choice of secondary impression materials: ZnO Eugenol
- Mucostatic
- Technique is mucocompressive if used with non-spaced non-perforated tray
- Sometimes used with one spacer
- Can be used with two spacers and wide perforations in mild flabby areas - relatively mucostatic
- Cheap, easy to modify and accurate
Mucostatic
Runny material in spaced tray
Not going to cause any pressure or force to ridges
Minimal undercuts (ZnO eugenol)
Tray fits tissues closely, extended just short of final periphery of where the denture is to be extended to.
1-2mm short of the deepest part of the sulcus
What prevents distortion with bigger undercuts
Constraining tray
Elastic material: alginate or silicone
Thickness of alginate for secondary impressions
3mm thickness
Otherwise losing accuracy