DAY 1 (PM) Labor Law Flashcards
- The workers worked as cargadores at the warehouse and ricemills of farm A for several years. As cargadores, they loaded, unloaded and pilled sacks of rice from the warehouse to the cargo trucks for delivery to different places. They were paid by Farm A on a piece-rate basis.
Are the workers considered regular employees?
a. Yes, because Farm A paid wages directly to these workers without the intervention of any third party independent contractor.
b. Yes, their work is directly related, necessary and vital to the operations of the farm.
c. No, because Farm A did not have the power to control the workers with respect to the means and methods by which the work is to be accomplished.
d. Both A and B.
- The following are excluded from the coverage of Book III of the Labor Code of the Philippines (Conditions of Employment) except _____.
a. field personnel
b. supervisors
c. managers
d. employees of government-owned and controlled corporations
- Work may be performed beyond eight (8) hours a day provided that ________.
a. employee is paid for overtime work an additional compensation wquivalent to his regular wage plus at least 25% thereof
b. employee is paid for overtime work an additional compensation equivalent to his regular wage plus at least 30% thereof
c. employee is paid for overtime work an additional compensation equivalent to his regular wage plus at least 20% thereof
d. none of the above
- May the employer and employee stipulate that the latter’s regular or basic salary already includes the overtime pay, such that when the employee actually works overtime he cannot claim overtime pay?
a. Yes, provided there is a clear written agreement knowingly and freely entered into by the employees.
b. Yes, provided the mathematical result shows that the agreed legal wage rate and the overtime pay, computed separately, are equal to or higher than the separate amounts legally due.
c. No, the employer and employee cannot stipulate includes the overtime pay.
d. Both A and B.
- The following are instances where an employer can require an employee to work overtime, except ______.
a. in case of actual or impending emergencies caused by serious accident, fire, flood, typhoon, earthquake, epidemic or other disaster or calamity to prevent loss of life and property, or imminent danger to public safety
b. when the country is at war or when other national or local emergency has been declared by the national assembly or the chief executive
c. when there is urgent work to be performed on machines, installations, or equipment or some other cause of similar nature
d. where the completion or contribution of the work started before the eight hour is necessary to prevent serious obstruction or prejudice to the business or operations of the employer
- Z owns and operates a carinderia. His regular employees are his wife, his two (2) children, the family maid, a cook, two (2) waiters, a dishwasher and a janitor. The family driver occasionally works for him during store hours to make deliveries. On April 09, the dishwasher did not report for work. The employer did not give his pay for that day.
Is the employer correct?
a. No, because employees have a right to receive their regular daily wage during regular holidays.
b. Yes, because April 09 is not regular holidays.
c. Yes, because of the principle of “a fair day’s wage for a fair day’s work”.
d. Yes, because he employs less than ten (10) employees.
- For misconduct or improper behavior to be just cause for dismissal, the following guidelines must be met, except ________.
a. it must be serious
b. it must relate to the performance of the employee’s duties
c. it should not be used as a subterfuge for causes which are improper, illegal or unjustified
d. it must show that the employee has become unfit to continue working for the employer
- The Company lawyer sent a memo to the employee informing him of the specific charges against him and giving him an opportunity to explain his side. In a subsequent letter, the employee was informed that, on the basis of the results of the investigation conducted, his written explanation, the written explanation of other employees as well as the audit report, the management has decided to terminate his employment. The employee contended that his termination was illegal for lack of procedural due process.
Is the employee’s contention correct?
a. No, the employee’s written explanation and written explanation of the other employees were sufficient basis for the employer to terminate his employment.
b. Yes, because the employer did not abide by the two-notice rule.
c. Yes, because he was not properly afforded the chance to explain his side in a conference.
d. No, because the written notice of the cause of dismissal afforded him ample opportunity to be heard and defend himself, and the written notice of the decision to terminate him which states the reasons therefor, complies with the two-notice rule.
- The Supreme Court categorically declared that separation pay shall be allowed as a measure of social justice only in those instances where the employee is validly dismissed for cause other than _____.
a. serious misconduct
b. gross and habitual neglect of duties
c. Willful disobedience to lawful orders
d. fraud or willful breach of trust
- K is a legitimate contractor hired by G for six (6) months. On the third month, G remitted to K the salaries and wages of the employees. However, K absconded with the money leaving the employees unpaid. The disgruntled employees demanded from G the payment of their salaries.
Is G liable?
a. No, because G has already remitted the employees’ salaries to K, validly excusing G from liability.
b. Yes, because he is jointly and solidarily liable for whatever monetary claims the employees may have against K.
c. Yes, because of the principle of “a fair day’s wage for a fair day’s work”.
d. Both B and C.
- Corporation X is owned by L’s family. L is the President. M, L’s wife, occasionally gives loans to employees of Corporation X. It was customary that loan payment were paid to M by directly deducting from the employee’s monthly salary.
Is this practice of directly deducting payments of debts from the employee’s wages allowed?
a. Yes, because where the employee is indebted to the employer, it is sanctioned by the law on compensation under Article 1706 of the Civil Code.
b. Yes, because it has already become customary such that no express authorization is required.
c. No, because an employee’s payment of obligation to a third person is deductible from the employee’s wages if the deduction is authorized in writing.
d. No, because Article 116 of the Labor Code absolutely prohibits the withholding of wages and kickbacks. Article 116 provides for no exception.
- Union X staged a strike in front of Company B because of A CBA deadlock. During the strike, Company B hired replacement workers. Upon resuming their employment, the strikers found that Company B hired replacement workers in their place.
Is Company B obliged to reinstate the returning workers?
a. No, because the strike caused work stoppage.
b. No, because it is a valid exercise of management prerogative.
c. Yes, because workers who go on strike do not lose their employment status.
d. Yes, because workers are entitled to such retention every time during a valid strike.
- Which of the following is not a valid reason for a strike?
a. There is a bargaining deadlock.
b. There is a prevailing intra-union dispute.
c. The company engaged in unfair labor practice.
d. Theirs is a flagrant violation of CBA’s economic provisions.
- Iya, 15 years old, signed up to model a clothing brand. She worked from 9am to 4pm on weekdays and 1pm to 6pm on Saturdays for two (2) weeks. She was issued a child working permit under RA 9231.
Which of the following statements is the most accurate?
a. Working permit for Iya’s employment is not required because the job is not hazardous.
b. Her work period exceeds the required working hours for children aged 15 years old.
c. To require a 15-year old to work without obtaining the requisite working permit is a form of child labor.
d. Iya, who was engaged in a work that is not child labor, is a working child.
- Under employee’s compensation, the so-called “Theory of Increased Risks” is relevant when ________.
a. there is a need to categorize a disability as permanent and total
b. it is not clear as to how an injury was sustained
c. the ailment or sickness is not classified as an occupational disease
d. there is a prima facie finding that the employee had willful intention to hurt himself
- Which of the following injuries/death is not compensable?
a. Injuries sustained by a technician while at a field trip initiated by the Union and sponsored by the Company
b. Injuries received by a janitor at a Union election meeting
c. Death of a bank teller because of a bank robbery
d. Death of a professor who was hit by a van on his way home from work
- The provisions of the Labor Code on the Working Conditions and Rest Periods of employees are inapplicable to the following employees, except ___________.
a. a supervisor in a fast food chain
b. a family driver
c. a laborer without any fixed salary, but receiving a compensation depending upon the result of his work
d. a contractual employee
- Bugay, an employee with only six (6) months of service, was dismissed due to redundancy. He is, under Art. 283 of the Labor Code, entitled to a separation pay of ___________.
a. one (1) month pay
b. one (1) year pay, Art. 283 of the Labor Code being explicit that “a fraction of at least six (6) months shall be considered one ( 1) whole year”
c. six (6) months pay
d. one (1) year and six (6) months pay, as Art. 4 of the Labor Code mandates that “(a)ll doubts in the implementation and interpretation of this Code xxx shall be resolved in favor of labor”
- The power to suspend or cancel a license to recruit employees is vested on ________.
a. the Secretary of Labor and Employment
b. The POEA Administrator
c. A and B concurrently
d. neither of them
- The State shall allow the deployment of overseas Filipino workers only in countries where the rights of Filipino migrant workers are protected.
Which of the following is not a guarantee, on the part of the receiving country, for the protection of the rights of OFW’s?
a. It has existing labor and social laws protecting the rights of migrant workers.
b. It promotes and facilitates re-integration of migrants into the national mainstream.
c. It is a signatory to and/or ratifier of multilateral conventions, declarations or resolutions relating to the protection of migrant workers.
d. It has concluded a bilateral agreement or arrangement with the government on the protection of the rights of overseas Filipino workers.