Darfur - a Degraded Environment - Case Study Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Darfur’s geography

A
  • Western region of Sudan, Africa
  • Sub-saharan country - northern parts are a desert
  • Challenging physical geography
  • Climate has changed to become more extreme and less reliable over the years
  • Conflict in Sudan has been going on since 2003
  • Talk using “internally displaced people” instead of “refugees”
  • Genocide with particular ethnic groups being targeted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Darfur’s Conflict

A
  • Tensions over land grazing rights
  • Arab nomadic herders (moving livestock around country) vs African farmers growing crops
  • Livestock eat crops of farmers
  • Farmers struggle as their livelihoods comes from crops and farming
  • There is a campaign of ethnic cleansing by Janjaweed militias against Darfur’s black African population.
  • Sudanese government based in Khartoum (capital) of oppressing black Africans in favour of Arabs.
  • Darfur was mainly viewed as a peripheral region by the government in Khartoum so as a result, the region suffered considerable neglect, with poor transport infrastructure and little investment in health and education.
  • This led to considerable feelings of resentment among the people in the region.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Causes of Environmental Degradation in Darfur

A

1) Climate Change
2) High rate of Population Growth
3) Conflict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Environmental Degradation from Climate Change

A
  • In general, Sudan’s physical geography is challenging to humans
  • Region is and, water sources are scarce and populations can only live near sources of water
  • Sahara Desert lies in the North
  • Much of Darfur is covered with infertile, sandy soil
  • Climate change has exacerbated the challenging climate
  • There has been a marked drop in rainfall since 1972
  • With rainfall down by up to 30% over 40 years and the Sahara advancing by well over a mile every year.
  • The desert in northern Sudan has advanced outwards by 60 miles over the past 40 years, (desertification).
  • Climate models suggest a rise of 0.5-1.5 degrees celcius between 2030 and 2060.
  • Yields in sorghum could drop by 70%.
  • More significantly, droughts have become more frequent: 16 of the 20 driest years recorded have occurred since 1972.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Environmental Degradation from Population Growth

A
  • Sudan is at Stage 2/3 of the DTM
  • High rate of population growth
  • Darfur’s population grew from 1 million to 6 million between 1956 and 2003, leading to overgrazing and over cultivation
  • Overcultivation → Soil Exhaustion → Soil erosion and desertisifcation
  • Deforestation of land for cultivation and grazing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Environmental Degradation from Conflict

A
  • Firstly, the deliberate destruction of arable, pastoral, forest or water resources has been used as a tool of war
  • A good target would be to target food supply
  • The unprecedented concentrations of population in Darfur’s IDP camps are causing localised resource depletion
  • IDP camps are generally located on the outskirts of market towns, resulting in the destruction of shelter belts, forestry and farmland
  • The intense concentration of people leads to:
  • -> Camps lead to deforestation due to energy gained from fuel wood and for building materials
  • -> Intensive extraction of groundwater and possible a physical water scarcity
  • -> Over-cultivation and Overgrazing → Soil loses fertility, loses quality of soil in the area
  • Uncontrolled deforestation is taking place, in the context of a breakdown of governance, driven by the role of timber and fuel wood in the war and crisis economy
  • Migration routes are blocked, leading to overgrazing in areas where livestock are concentrated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sudan conflict statistics

A
  • 300 thousand dead
  • 2000 bombs
  • 3 million displaced
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Constraints to managing the environment in Darfur

A

1) Conflict
2) Economic development
3) Physical geography

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conflict as a constraint to managing the environment in Darfur

A

Biggest constraint to managing the environment is conflict, because it’s difficult to maintain, protect the area in conflict, and it focuses on people’s priorities rather than management

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Economic Development as a constraint to managing the environment in Darfur

A
  • Low level of economic development
  • Sudan has HDI of 0.51, the 20th lowest HDI in the world
  • Government has no money to implement schemes
  • Poor infrastructure - hard to travel around and improve degradation
  • Stage 3 of DTM with population growing, putting more pressure on resources
  • Deforestation due to use of fuelwood for energy
  • High level of corruption??????
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Physical Geography as a constraint to managing the environment in Darfur

A
  • Harsh environments
  • Arid, remote rural area
  • Climate change
  • All effects are worsened
  • -> Low crop yield
  • -> Desertification
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluation of constraints to managing the environment in Darfur

A
  • Without conflict, there would be a bigger focus on economic development
  • Both conflict and economic development play a major role as a constraint
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Attempts to manage Darfur’s environment

A

1) Fuel efficient stoves
2) Demarcating Paths
3) Greening Darfur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Fuel efficient stoves: Needs

A
  • Unsustained use of firewood degrades the environment
  • Conflict over scarce resources intensifies conflict
  • Additional social and economic risks from current practice
  • Socially sustainable (giving someone an economic livelihood - source of income)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fuel efficient stoves: Measures

A
  • Largely based on training and education

- Uses materials already available to population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fuel efficient stoves: Outcomes

A
  • Adopted by 95% of West Darfur’s population
  • Uses up to 60% less fuel used than traditional stoves, slowing the impacts of deforestation
  • Host of social and economic benefits
17
Q

Fuel efficient stoves: Evaluation

A
  • There has been a success because the vast migrants of the population are using it
  • The aims are achieved, and the problems like deforestation are being slowed down
  • However, it has only slowed down deforestation but has not stopped it entirely
  • It has just slow down, and has done nothing to reverse the impacts and not restoring the environment that has been degraded
  • The root cause of the conflict has not been addressed
18
Q

Demarcating Paths: Needs

A
  • Concrete poles with different paths and tells them where crops are
  • The needs of the Arab nomadic pastoralists to drive this herds to new grazing areas via migration routes have led to consistent conflict with black African arable farmers ‘herds ate the crops’
19
Q

Demarcating Paths: Measures

A
  • NGO Practical Action worked with local community leaders to identify areas with greatest conflict, then mutually agreeable migration routes
  • This shows how the NGO worked with both sides of the conflict with different stakeholders (Arabs and Africans) taken into account when planning
  • Focused on reducing the conflict
  • 165km of concrete posts have been installed to demarcate (show where they are) these planned migratory routes.
  • They were between 75m - 150m wide

Posts are marked according to the land use through which the route passes through:

  • Red - Crops right at the edge of the path (agricultural zone)
  • Yellow - crops nearby
  • White - no crops nearly (“no cultivation area”) and animals are free to graze
20
Q

Demarcating Paths: Evaluation

A
  • Addresses root causes of environmental degradation
  • Only been done in a small area 165km - small area of whole country
  • Doesn’t do anything to manage environment and deforestation
21
Q

Greening Darfur: Needs

A

Ongoing conflict, degraded environment, depleted resources

22
Q

Greening Darfur: Measures

A

Relatively large scale project (over 43 communities and over 70,000 people participated)

1) Worked with communities
- Community leaders and residents were given conflict resolution training
- This led to joint resource access management plans and agreeing on development priorities between Arab and Black African population, reducing conflict encouraging community cohesion with establishments of Community Based Organisation
2) Afforestation
- Terrace construction, community forests, shelterbelts, vegetation regeneration
3) Water conservation
- This was prioritised to maximise resources - terraces were built to secure crop yield and reduce soil exhaustion
4) Improvement of facilities/infrastructure/information
- Building and/or rehabilitating a range of infrastructure facilities (e.g. 14 mini dams)
- Training and information dissemination to widen the choice of seeds, tools + equipment aimed at farmers

23
Q

Greening Darfur: Outcomes

A
  • Over 200k seedlings planted and 11 community forests established
  • 40% increase in crop yield in targeted areas
  • 20,000 households reduced time taken to get water by 50%
  • Host of social and economic benefits
  • The development priorities of the local community were identified and built into the scheme, making it more successful and sustainable
24
Q

Greening Darfur: Evaluation

A
  • Did stop the degradation
  • Reduced use of resources
  • Reduced conflict - “Joint resource access” management
  • Sustainable - All the activities developed through this project are transferable, replicable, scalable
  • However, even though it is a relatively large scale, it does not eliminate all the conflict with the whole region
  • Not everyone may participate to stick by the activities or agree with the agreements