Cultural Variations in Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What did Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg (1988) do?

A

A meta-analysis of the proportion of the different types of attachment (secure …etc) across different countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many countries were involved in Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg (1988)?

A

8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How many children were involved overall in Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg (1988)?

A

1990

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the finding of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg (1988) relating to the individualist cultures?

A

-Insecure-resistant was similar to Ainsworth’s original sample (14%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the finding of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg (1988) relating to the collectivist cultures?

A

-Insecure-avoidant was above 25%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the conclusion of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg (1988)?

A

The variation between the results of studies within the same countries were greater than between countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Simonelli (2014) do?

A

Replicates Ainsworth strange situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Where did Simonelli (2014) replicate Ainsworth strange situation?

A

Italy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who did Simonelli (2014) assess?

A

76 12-month-olds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How did the mothers vary in Simonelli (2014)?

A

In education and profession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the findings of Simonelli (2014)

A
  • 50% secure
  • 36% insecure-avoidance
  • 24% insecure-resistant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did the findings of Simonelli (2014) differ from previous studies?

A

A lower percentage of secure attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did the researchers of Simonelli (2014) suggest why the reduction in secure attachment?

A

More mothers going to work for longer hours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is there high internal validity in Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg (1988)?

A

Yes as large sample reduces the chance of biased methodology or unusual participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the limitations of Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg (1988)?

A

Samples may not representative of cultures (Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg focused on COUNTRIES not cultures)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Van Ijzendoorn and Sagi (2001) find?

A
  • Found similar attachments in urban Tokyo compared to Western studies
  • Rural Tokyo showed more insecure-resistant
17
Q

Is the Strange Situation biased towards a particular culture?

A

Yes

18
Q

What culture is the Strange Situation biased towards?

A

American/British culture

19
Q

Does the Stange Situation produce imposed etic?

A

Yes

20
Q

What is imposed etic?

A

Cultural universal

21
Q

What does the production of imposed etic reduce?

A

Cultural emic

22
Q

What is cultural emic?

A

Cultural uniqueness

23
Q

What did Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonberg suggest why there is the cultural difference?

A

The effect of mass media

24
Q

What may be a confounding variable in the Strange situation?

A

Temperament

25
Q

What is temperament?

A

The genetic personality of a child