Cross-Cultural Psychology Flashcards

1
Q

Define culture

A

“Systems of Shared meanings” (Smith & Bond, 1998, p. 69)

“The rich complex of meanings, beliefs, practices, symbols, norms, and values prevalent among people in a society.” (Schwartz, 2004, p. 43)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the two types of culture variables?

A

Objective culture: Explicit (e.g., buildings, Music, language) of interest to anthropologists

Subjective culture: More latent (e.g., norms, values, expectations, attitudes) of interest to psychologists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline the History of Cross-culutral psych

A

End of 19th century –birth of anthropology
1960’s –birth of cross-cultural psychology as a discipline
Why so late?
Lab studies
Non-western cultures seen as ‘primitive’
What contributed to forming a cross-cultural psychology?
Post WWII –many new nations
Higher mobility
international students
Larger research funds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define mainstream psycholgy

define cross-cultural psycholgy

A

“Mainstream” Psychology: The study of human psyche in one culture, assuming the findings can be generalized to all humans and not just those in the study.

Cross-cultural psychology: The study of cultural difference in more than one culture. The goal is to develop a universal psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

is the “mainsteam” aspect of psychology justified?

A

68% of participants in published experimental research came from the US (2003-2007).
96% of participants came from Western industrialized countries, especially US and Europe.
80% of samples were composed solely of undergraduates.
Arnett, 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does the acronym WEIRD stand for?

A
Henrich et al., 2010
W estern  
E  ducated  
I   ndustrialized  
R  ich  
D  emocratic  
Just another culture, not typical of the world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Are Western theories valid in other cultures?

give 2 examples

A

The answer: Not always
E.g., East-Asia: Traits, such as ‘friendly’, ‘curious’ are not such good predictors of behaviour
East-Asia: People do not strive for high status and prestige
example (Chiu, 1972) picture of cow, grass and chicken
Question: Which two go together?
Westerners: cow and chicken are both animals
Use rule:
Easterners: the cow eats the grass
Use relationship
Example: Description (Masuda & Nisbett, 2001)
Watched animations: Describe what you see
Americans: start describing with the focal object Japanese start describing the background
Japanese had more to say about the background (65% more)
Why?
Because they focus on the background. They’re less likely to focus on individual fish- brought up this way as they’re more of a collective society os pay attention to group and environment rather than individual

Westerners will focus on a goal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the difference between an etic approach and an emic approach?

A
Emic: 
Focus on culture-specific phenomena, e.g., 
Behaviours 
Norms
Values 
Customs 
Traditions
ethnographical research, anthropology
Etic approach: 
Compares universal dimensions, e.g., 
Behaviour 
Norms 
Values 
Emotion
Cross-cultural psychology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How do cultures differ from one another?

A

Triandis: Individualism-Collectivism

Eastern cultures are regarded as ‘collectivist’ with emphasis placed on importance of the group over the individual

Western cultures are regarded as ‘individualist’ where pursuit of individual or personal goals are encouraged

Affect and Well-Being
Affect (moods and emotions) –> life satisfaction.
More in individualistic cultures.
Cultural norms. –> Life satisfaction.
More in collectivist cultures (Suh et al, 1998)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

explain the cross-cultural varaition to Asch’s paridigm

A

Conformity: Asch’s Paradigm
Presented as a ‘line judgement task’: Say which line (A/B/C) is the same as the target line.
Confederates give the same wrong answer.
Will the participant give the right or wrong answer?
One-third of participants changed their judgments due to group pressure.
Cross-cultural variations:
Smaller effect size in North America and Western Europe than in the rest of the world
they are correlated with cultures’ individualism and collectivism scores (Bond & Smith, 1996)
Negative connotation of conformity in the West (Friend et al, 1990)
Japanese didn’t conform when others were strangers (Williams & Sogon, 1984)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

explain the links between Triandis and I/C culture

A

Private self vs. Public and Collective self Individualistic cultures emphasize the private self (internal attributes and separateness)
Collectivistic cultures emphasize the public and collective aspects of self (interconnected with other people and interdependent with them)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the links between I/C culture and schizophrenia

A

Griffiths et al., 2006)
Col. Groups: Hard to return to the group once out of the group
Maximise differences in/outgroup
Japanese > Australian want social distance from schizophrenic
Col: Group importance
Japanese > Australian & British not talk about our schizophrenic relative outside the family, help them within the family (not professionals)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline the difference between independent and interdependent self.

A

Markus & Kitayama (1991):
Self is different in both collective and individualist cultures.

Independent Self
Separate from social context
Bounded, unitary, stable
Life tasks: Be unique, express self, self-actualization
Internal, private(feelings, thoughts)
Direct communication
Self-esteem depends on ability to express self, validate internal attributes

Interdependent
Self-Connected with social context: connected to expectations e.g. family
Flexible, variable External, public(roles, statuses, relationships) ahs to be flexible to the many expectations e.g. from amily or uni
Life tasks: belong, fit-in, engage in appropriate action, promote others’ goals
Indirect communication will express ourself in a different way. E.g. not being able to say no.
Self-esteem depends on ability to adjust, maintain harmony, restrain self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

give some I/C self description research

A

Self Description Studies (reviewed in Smith & Bond, 1998)
Task: Answer the question: Who am I? Participants are given 20 lines.
People from Independent Cultures reported more generalized (i.e., context free) trait labels in describing themselves
People from Interdependent Cultures were more likely to describe their traits with concrete examples.

Collectivist cultures- will repond more to group needs than individualist cultures even when the person Is not originally from that culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

GIVE research no how I/C cultures differ on placing imporance on uniqueness/commonness

A
(Kim & Markus 1999)
American ads: uniqueness 
Think differently 
Chooseyour own views 
The internet isn’t for everybody. But then again, you are not everybody 
Saturn, a different kind of company

East Asian ads: conformity
Our ginseng drink is produced according to the methods of 500 year-old tradition
Bring a fresh breeze to your wife at home
Our company is working toward building a harmonioussociety
Seven out of 10 people are using this product
Do it for our children

American participants choose products that are unique, East Asians choose products that are common

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Outline research into Love and Interdependent/independentself

A
Independent Self 
Separate from social context 
feelings, thoughts 
Life tasks:  Be unique, express self, selfactualization
Interdependent Self 
Connected with social context 
roles, statuses 
Life tasks: belong, fit-in, engage in appropriate action, promote others’ goals

Burgess & Wallin(1953): “In American society… love is the only right basis for marriage”
Hsu (1981): An American asks ‘how does my heart feel?’ A Chinese asks ‘What will other people say?

AND….In Chinese cultures (interdependent)
love seen as sad
Holding hands in public traditionally scorned
In traditional Indian literature (interdependent) infatuation and romantic love reported but not necessarily relevant to marriage

17
Q

how does culture change prefernce?

A

Festinger: cognitive dissonance = inconsistency between any two cognitions
discomfort Heine & Lehman (1997) study:
1.Participants were promised a CD they like as payment for participation
2.Participants rated 10 CDs
3.Got choice of 5thor 6thof their rating
4.Rated CDs again. 5.Will the rating change? Changed more in Americans than Japanese

18
Q

Outline the consistency in self appearances

A

Ideal Self-Actual Self: In cultures that emphasize interdependence (e.g., Japan), self-criticism is valued because group members are expected to strive continually to improve themselves.

For Japanese students, discrepancies between ideals and real self were larger than Canadian students, and were not as depressing as they were for Canadian students (see Heine & Lehman, 1999 UBC study).

19
Q

Outline Hofstedes cultural dimensions

A

Hofstede used factor analysis to discover his v cultural dimensions
UK is low in power distance e.g. don’t have to agree all the time such as questioning lecturers

India is high in power distance

Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions

Uncertainty avoidance: a focus on planning and the creation of stability as a way of dealing with life’s uncertainties.

How tolerent is the culture towards uncertainties?

Low on uncertainty avoidance: much more open to changing rules and reconsidering order (UK)

20
Q

What is power distance

A

theamountofrespect anddeferencebetweenthosein superiorandsubordinatepositions.

21
Q

What is uncertainty avoidance

A

afocusonplanningandthecreationofstabilityasawayof dealingwithlife’suncertainties.

22
Q

What are Hofstede’s cultural dimensions?

A

Individualism‐collectivism: whetherone’sidentityis definedbypersonalchoicesandachievementorby thecharacterofthecollectivegroupstowhichone ismoreorlesspermanentlyattached.

Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions Masculinity‐femininity: the relative emphasis on achievement or on interpersonal harmony, a distinction that characterizes gender differences in values across many national cultures.

23
Q

give the criticisms to Hofstede’s cultural dimension

A

Criticisms:

Not theoretically based why only these 4 what really are the differences?

Biased samples (117,000 employers of IBM, most of them were males) –> are they representative?

24
Q

give some findings using Hofstede’s cultural dimension

A

Power Distance and acceptance of insults (Bond, Wan, Leung, & Giacalone, 1985):

Students read scenarios of an insult situation (either by superior or peer) Does it matter who the insult come from (superior or peer)?

Among Chinese (high power distance culture), an insult from a superior was perceived as much more acceptable than an insult from a peer.

Among Americans (low power distance culture), an insult from a superior was perceived as only slightly more acceptable than an insult from a peer.

Masculinity/Femininity and feeling good after crying:
In which cultures would men feel better after crying?
More in ‘feminine’ cultures (Bechts & Vingerhoets, 2002)

25
Q

I/C and partner preference?

A

An old topic: at least 60 years of questions
Individualistic cultures: ‘abstract qualities’ (honesty, kindness)
collective cultures: pragmatic qualities (money, family connections, religion)

Why? Of course, choice is often non-existent, or limited.

But it does depend…
Partly on type of relationship (boyfriend, husband). Hofstede (1996) in 8 Asian (collectivistic) cities
Boyfriends with humour
Husbands with status, and wealth
This particularly the case in masculine countries (sex-role orientated) e.g. Japan rather than Thailand.

26
Q

I/C and personalised ads

A

Education and income frequently mentioned in more collectivist societies
But sex dependent: not good for a Chinese woman to be too educated (Honig & Herschatter, 1988): she should be beautiful, with poise, and good household manager.

27
Q

how do migrents cause ind/col issues in the UK?

A
Potential culture-based conflict  
Can be less choice in Asian minorities:  
Opportunities for mixed sex contact  
Who is allowed to date at all  
Choice of boyfriends (if any)  
Timing of marriage  
Pre-marital meetings (if any)  
Marital choice (religion/ caste/ family connections) 
How does ind/col explain?  
Ind/col arguments: 
Collectivist-  ‘union of families’  
Individualist- finding of a ‘suitable’ ‘like-minded’ partner.
28
Q

how does Ind/ col cuture explain family roles?

A
Generally, males more assertive and domineering 
May have roots in natural selection, but greater where strength is important 
Maybe less important in highly industrialised nations 
African families (high masculinity culture) 
 greatest sex role differentiation. Household heads at top, although many males now migrants and hard to assert themselves on their return.
29
Q

Explain Hikkomori

A

A disorder quite unique to Japan:
Shutting oneself in one’s room for over 3 months
Lack of communication
Mostly young (adolescent) males
Could Japan’s high score on masculinity and on uncertainty avoidance explain this?

30
Q

How does Hofstede’s cultural dimensions explain child rearing attitudes?

A
Combination of two cultural dimensions  
Low power distance, high femininity:  
Parents dominate less  
Greater emphasis on  
child’s feelings  
gender equality 
(Hofstede, 1994) 

Parental control associated with warmth and acceptance in Japan (Lebra, 1992)
parental rejection/ hostility in Germany
Children dress-up by themselves
to obey parent in Japan
to express independence in Israel (Heath, 1995)

31
Q

Explain Schwartz’s cultural dimensions

A

2004
Derived theoretically from 3 Problems that all societies confront:
1.To what extent are people autonomous vs. embedded in their groups?
Autonomy (own person) vs. Embeddedness (group needs)
2. How to guarantee responsible behaviour? Egalitarianism (everyone at the same level) vs. Hierarchy (clear roles arranged in a tier system, hierarchy)
3. Relations of people with the natural world –by fitting in (Harmony) or by mastering (Mastery)
Computing by average

32
Q

How does culture relate to crime?

A

Ruism- “tradition” also known as Confucianism- a philosophy religion ,a way of governing or simply a way of life
“women in Africa most at risk from being killed by a partner or family member”
Africa one of the highest or hierarchy but you don’t necessarily generate culture to a continent.
In which cultures would people help a stranger? (Knafo, Schwartz, & Levine, 2009)
Cultures low on embeddedness
Country-Level Helping Scores
Helpfulness toward strangers data were taken from Levine et al.’s (2001) 23 country study, in which trained, college-aged, local experimenters pretended to need help in three different situations:
dropping a pen without noticing (n = 424), accidentally dropping a pile of magazines while walking with an injured leg (n = 493), and appearing to be a blind person requiring assistance to cross the street (n = 281).
DV: would people help?
The less embedded the country is the more likely you are too help.

33
Q

What does culture not always predict?

A

E.g., Independent: direct communication
British say but mean
Sex roles (Williams & Best, 1990)
Netherlands, Germany, Finland and England all had high egalitarian Sex Role Ideology scores
Generally higher egalitarianism amongst countries with high individualism, high socioeconomic development, and more Protestants.
However, even in Britain, considerable gender segregation even where both work. The ‘new man’ not always that new.