Critical Appraisal RCT Introduction Flashcards

1
Q

Assessing Cause and Effect

A

Each individual is either exposed to the treatment or not
- Assess which ones had the outcome and which ones didn’t

All confounding variables should be kept the same with the only difference being exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do biases arise

A

The only difference in groups should be the experimental intervention
- Biases results from differences in prognostic factors (Patient Characteristics)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Steps to practice EBM

A
  1. Ask
  2. Acquire
  3. Appraise
  4. Apply
  5. Act and Assess
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Using pre-appraised resources

A

Have to be careful as individual studies can be misleading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Random Error
- What is it

A

Random Error: Pure chance causes differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Systematic Error
- What is it

A

Systematic Error (Bias)
- Underestimation or Overestimation of underlying effects leading to Systematic Deviation from the underlying truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Systematic Error
- Causes

A

Caused by a feature of the design or the conduct of the research study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Random Error vs Systematic Error

A

Random Error: Graph is spread out and more variable, mean is still the same
- Does not affect the mean

Systematic Error: Graph’s mean deviates from the original
- Affects the mean

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

EBCP definition

A

Evidence Based Clinical Practice
- Find the best available evidence from systematic reviews and meta analysis
- Determine the strength of those evidences
- How useful it the evidence’s result to the patient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is it important to study critical appraisals

A

To be able to assess the quality of studies and deal with misinformation

Be able to tell the difference from high and low quality research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Resources to find study synopses and critical appraisals

A

Wiki Journal Club

ACP Journal Club

RX Files

BMJ Evidence Based Medicine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Summary Resources

A

Dynamed

Lexidrugs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Major categories of bias

A
  1. Arises from randomization process
  2. Deviations from intended intervention
  3. Missing outcome data
  4. Measurement of the outcome
  5. Selection of the reported result
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Steps to appraise a therapy trial (JAMA approach)

A
  1. Risk of Bias
  2. Clinical Relevance
  3. Applicable to Patient Care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Risk of Bias
- JAMA Approach

A
  • Was prognostic balance maintained beginning, during the study, and the end
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Clinically Relevance
- JAMA Approach

A

How large is the treatment effect
How precise is the estimate of the treatment effect

17
Q

Applicable to Patient Care

A
  • Were the study patients similar to my patients
  • Were all important outcomes considered
  • Are the benefits worth the harms and costs
18
Q

Understanding Confidence Intervals
- 1.43 [0.51,4.05]

What does 1.43 mean

A

1.43 times / 43% more likely

For a good event
- Greater than 1 means more likely for good event
- Less than 1 means less likely for good event

19
Q

Understanding Confidence Intervals
- 1.43 [0.51,4.05]

What does 0.51 mean

A

Lower limit
- Cure rate are up to 50% / 0.50 times lower with duct tape

20
Q

Understanding Confidence Intervals
- 1.43 [0.51,4.05]

What does 4.05 mean

A

Upper limit
- Cure rate are up to 300% / 4 times higher with duct tape

21
Q

Understanding Confidence Intervals
- Sufficiently precise

A

If 95% CI crosses a decision threshold then the results are not sufficiently precise

If 95% CI does not cross a decision threshold then the results are sufficiently precise

22
Q

Relevance

A
  1. Does the info focus on outcomes patients care about
  2. Is the intervention feasible and is the problem it addresses common
  3. Would the information cause a change in practice

If yes to all 3 it is patient oriented evidence

23
Q

Validity

A

Technical rigor of the work (Is it accurate?)

24
Q

Work

A

Time, money, and effort to answer a question

25
Q

Usefulness of Medical Information

A

(Relevance * Validity) / Work

26
Q

Different Types of Bias

A
  1. Detection Bias
  2. Observer Bias
  3. Publication Bias
  4. Recall Bias
  5. Selective Outcome Reporting Bias
  6. Social Desirability Bias
27
Q

Sources of Bias
- Differences at the start of a study

A

Between group differences in prognosis

28
Q

Reducing Bias
- Differences at the start of a study

A

Randomization, Allocation concelment

29
Q

Source of Bias
- Differences that Occur as the study proceeds

A

Placebo Effect
Co-intervention
Bias in assessment of outcomes

30
Q

Reducing Bias
- Differences that Occur as the study proceeds (Placebo)

A

Blinding of Patients

31
Q

Reducing Bias
- Differences that Occur as the study proceeds (Co-intervention)

A

Blinding of caregivers

32
Q

Reducing Bias
- Differences that Occur as the study proceeds (Assessment)

A

Blinding of assessors of outcomes

33
Q

Source of Bias
- Differences at the Completion of the study

A
  • Loss to follow-up
  • Stopping early because of large effect
  • Omitting patients who did not receive assigned treatment
34
Q

Reducing Bias
- Differences at the Completion of the study (Follow Up)

A

Ensure complete follow up

35
Q

Reducing Bias
- Differences at the Completion of the study (Stopping early)

A

Completing study as initially planned

36
Q

Reducing Bias
- Differences at the Completion of the study (Omitting patients)

A

Adhering to the intention to treat principle
- Analyze patients in the arm where they were originally randomized