Criminal Psychology Topic 3 Flashcards
Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 1
- Positive confrentation: say have evidence conferming guilt
Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 2
- Theme development: explain why guilty in an understable way
Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 3
- Handling Deniles: don’t let suspect denie
Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 4
- Overcoming Objection: deniles turned into ways of confessing guilt
Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 5
- Procument & retention of suspect: getting in personal space, forcing eye contact, prevent suspect from becoming withdrawn so they dont think about punishment
Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 6
- Passive mood: use suspects mood to seem understanding (why they are feeling that way) because they have been caught
Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 7
- Preventing alternitave questions: give 2 explanations as to why they commited the crime
Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 8
- Get suspect to give oral confession: ‘I did it’
Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 9
- Suspect WRITE full account of crime (detail
Gudjonsson false confession
Suspect
Young / Old
Low IQ
Mental Health Issues
Gudjonsson false confession
Arrest
At night
Sudden / Violent interigation
Over a long time
Gudjonsson false confession
Mental State
Stress / Anxious
Ill
Intoxicated
Gudjonsson false confession
Interigatigation
Coersive
Biased
Leading tactics
e.g. Birmingham 6 - confessed to IRA bombing imprisoned for 16 years (false confessions)
Mann et al - lie detection techniques
Sample
99 Kent police officers
24 female - 75 male
78 detectives
9 uniformed officers
8 training officers
4 traffic officers
Mann et al - lie detection techniques
Procedure & findings
Destinguish truth from lying
watched videos of 14 interviews - rate from 1 - 7 if they were lying
Could detect lies from truths
66.2% detected lies
63.6% detected truths
Mann et al - lie detection techniques
Conclution
Experinence - corrilated - accurcy
Cues leading to better accuracy were contraditions in story not body language
Officers trained to focuse on story not non-verbal cues
PEACE model of interviewing
P
Preparation
record current knowledge
PEACE model of interviewing
E
Engage
Build rapport & explain purpouse
PEACE model of interviewing
A
Account
Witness gives account with no interuptions
Then challenge inconsistancys
PEACE model of interviewing
C
Closure
Give ablity for furture contact
PEACE model of interviewing
E
Evaluation
Review infomation gathered
Check for inconsitancies
Memon & Higham
Review of Cognative Interview (CI)
Asspects
Context Reinstatement: as much infomation produced as whole CI (recall sences & feelings)
Recalling from different perspectives: confusing witenss - lead to - fabication of detail - no increased recall
Recalling in different order: mixed results (1 study found more infomation recalled
Memon & Higham
Review of Cognative Interview (CI)
Aspects
Context Reinstatement
Context Reinstatement: as much infomation produced as whole CI (recall sences & feelings)
Memon & Higham
Review of Cognative Interview (CI)
Aspects
Recalling from different perspectives
Recalling from different perspectives: confusing witenss - lead to - fabication of detail - no increased recall