Criminal Psychology Topic 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 1

A
  1. Positive confrentation: say have evidence conferming guilt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 2

A
  1. Theme development: explain why guilty in an understable way
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 3

A
  1. Handling Deniles: don’t let suspect denie
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 4

A
  1. Overcoming Objection: deniles turned into ways of confessing guilt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 5

A
  1. Procument & retention of suspect: getting in personal space, forcing eye contact, prevent suspect from becoming withdrawn so they dont think about punishment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 6

A
  1. Passive mood: use suspects mood to seem understanding (why they are feeling that way) because they have been caught
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 7

A
  1. Preventing alternitave questions: give 2 explanations as to why they commited the crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 8

A
  1. Get suspect to give oral confession: ‘I did it’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reid 9 step for interigation
Step 9

A
  1. Suspect WRITE full account of crime (detail
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gudjonsson false confession
Suspect

A

Young / Old
Low IQ
Mental Health Issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gudjonsson false confession
Arrest

A

At night
Sudden / Violent interigation
Over a long time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Gudjonsson false confession
Mental State

A

Stress / Anxious
Ill
Intoxicated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gudjonsson false confession
Interigatigation

A

Coersive
Biased
Leading tactics
e.g. Birmingham 6 - confessed to IRA bombing imprisoned for 16 years (false confessions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Mann et al - lie detection techniques
Sample

A

99 Kent police officers
24 female - 75 male
78 detectives
9 uniformed officers
8 training officers
4 traffic officers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mann et al - lie detection techniques
Procedure & findings

A

Destinguish truth from lying
watched videos of 14 interviews - rate from 1 - 7 if they were lying

Could detect lies from truths
66.2% detected lies
63.6% detected truths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mann et al - lie detection techniques
Conclution

A

Experinence - corrilated - accurcy
Cues leading to better accuracy were contraditions in story not body language
Officers trained to focuse on story not non-verbal cues

17
Q

PEACE model of interviewing
P

A

Preparation
record current knowledge

18
Q

PEACE model of interviewing
E

A

Engage
Build rapport & explain purpouse

19
Q

PEACE model of interviewing
A

A

Account
Witness gives account with no interuptions
Then challenge inconsistancys

20
Q

PEACE model of interviewing
C

A

Closure
Give ablity for furture contact

21
Q

PEACE model of interviewing
E

A

Evaluation
Review infomation gathered
Check for inconsitancies

22
Q

Memon & Higham
Review of Cognative Interview (CI)
Asspects

A

Context Reinstatement: as much infomation produced as whole CI (recall sences & feelings)
Recalling from different perspectives: confusing witenss - lead to - fabication of detail - no increased recall
Recalling in different order: mixed results (1 study found more infomation recalled

23
Q

Memon & Higham
Review of Cognative Interview (CI)
Aspects
Context Reinstatement

A

Context Reinstatement: as much infomation produced as whole CI (recall sences & feelings)

24
Q

Memon & Higham
Review of Cognative Interview (CI)
Aspects
Recalling from different perspectives

A

Recalling from different perspectives: confusing witenss - lead to - fabication of detail - no increased recall

25
Memon & Higham Review of Cognative Interview (CI) Aspects Recalling in different order
Recalling in different order: mixed results (1 study found more infomation recalled
26
Memon & Higham Review of Cognative Interview (CI) CI VS other methods
- Standard: Standards doesnt have standardised procedure -Guided memory: GM dosn't build rapport - Structured: BEST COMPARISON
27
Memon & Higham Review of Cognative Interview (CI) Memory Measures (linking to Standard)
Using simplistic measures (% of correct statements -miss out unreported infomation-) Standard: only wants information witness is 100% certain of - witness withholds infomation unsure of
28
Memon & Higham Review of Cognative Interview (CI) Training
-Done by Police Sargeants - Baseline measures (attitudes, motivation, experience) - Given Proformance feedback (prevent falling back into old habits) - Given practice - Training should last 2 days