Criminal Litigation Flashcards
What is the consequence of the police’s failure to follow PACE 1984 or the Codes of Practice (2 statutes)?
Evidence obtained in breach of these provisions may be excluded at a later criminal trial either under
- S.78 of PACE 1984 (admission of evidence would have an adverse effect on fairness of the proceedings); or
- S.76 of PACE 1984 (the suspect made incriminating admissions)
5 important duties of the custody officer?
- Search suspect on arrival
- Compile custody record
- Inform suspect of legal rights
- Decide if there is sufficient evidence to charge the suspect
- Undertake risk assessment
What is the deadline for the custody record? What does it contain?
As soon as reasonably practicable upon suspect’s arrival at the police station.
Detailed account of all aspects of the suspect’s detention (e.g. meals, refreshments, reason for detention, requests for legal advice)
Additional custody safeguard for vulnerable suspect?
Can be accompanied by “appropriate adult” at the police station
3 legal rights to be explained by custody officer?
- Inform someone of their arrest
- Consult privately with solicitor
- Consult Codes of Practice
Two considerations when searching suspect?
- Can seize and retain property and clothing if it could be used to cause injury, damage or escape
- Strip search requires special authorisation–either to identify a mark or tattoo that would confirm involvement in the offence, or reasonable belief that suspect may be concealing article that detainees are not allowed to keep
Two options for custody officer when deciding if there is sufficient evidence to charge suspect?
- Sufficient evidence: charge suspect and either: (i) release on police bail; or (ii) remand in custody awaiting MC
- Insufficient evidence: either (i) release; or (ii) keep without charge, subject to conditions
Two permissible reasons to detain suspect without charge? One precaution?
NECESSARY to:
1. secure or preserve evidence relating to an offence for which the suspect is under arrest
2. Obtain evidence by questioning the suspect
Must note reason for detaining without charge in the custody record
What is the relevant time for purposes of detention without charge (3 options)?
The earlier of:
1. The time the arrested person first arrives at the designated police station
2. (Rarely) 24 hours after the time of arrest
3. For persons who are arrested only the police station: the time of arrest
What is the “entry level” period of detention without charge? Preconditions?
When will this represent the absolute ceiling on D’s detention?
24 hours from the relevant time, if conditions in S.41 of PACE 1984 are met
D cannot be detained more than 24 hours without charge with respect to a SUMMARY OFFENCE
4 criteria to extend detention beyond 24 hours without court authorisation?
Up to 36 hours if the offence
1. can be tried in the Crown Court (i.e., either-way or indictable only):
2. Senior office of at least superintendent rank authorizes
3. Officer has reasonable grounds for believing that this is necessary to secure, preserve or obtain evidence
4. Investigation is conducted diligently and expeditiously
What procedure must police follow to detain suspect for 48 hours? Precondition? Maximum (with caveat)?
More than 36 hours = requires application to MC for warrant of further detention. Offence must be indictable or either-way.
Max of 72 hours if only one application is made; or 96 if a second further application is made.
Three options for suspect that has been detained without charge for 96 hours?
- Charge
- Release unconditionally
- Release on police bail
How often must a police of rank above inspector review the suspect’s detention to ensure detention remains lawful?
Effect of not carrying our reviews?
First time is no later than 6 hours after CO first authorized detention.
Subsequent reviews no later than 9 hours after previous review.
Detention will be unlawful until review takes place.
What are the 2 (+3) conditions for suspending a suspect’s right to inform someone of their arrest?
Maximum period of suspension?
- Arrest is in connection with indictable offence
- **Inspector and above **authorizes delay on the basis that this will lead to **interference with or harm to **evidence, persons, other suspects, or recovery of property obtained as a result of the offence
No more than 36 hours from the arrival at the designated police station
What right is created by S.58 of PACE 1984. What are the 2 (+3) conditions for suspending this right, and the maximum period of suspension?
Right to consult a solicitor privately at any time.
May be delayed if:
1. Arrest is in connection with an indictable offence; and
2. Officer of at least superintendent rank authorizes the delay on the basis that this will lead to interference or harm to evidence, persons, other suspects, or recovery of property obtained as a result of the offence.
No more than 36 hours from the arrival at the designated police station
3 most common cases where free legal advice may be restricted to telephone advice provided by Criminal Defence Direct?
- Detention is for a non-imprisonable offence
- Driving while unfit
- Detained for breach of police or court bail condition
Important consideration when dealing with an offender who is under 18 or mentally disordered?
CO must inform an appropriate adult as soon as possible about the detention and request the appropriate adult to attend the police station as soon as practicable.
Usual exception applies if police officer ranked superintendent or above authorizes it.
Three important legal rights of a volunteer? What if police wish to prevent a volunteer from leaving the station?
- Legal representation’
- Be cautioned before being questioned
- Be informed they are not under arrest and can leave police custody at any time
Formal detention of the volunteer requires arrest (and they will become a suspect).
Overarching consideration for defence solicitors?
Keep accurate and detailed contemporaneous notes about the involvement in the case from the moment they are contacted.
3 to-do items on defence solicitor’s list on arrival of the police station?
- Speak with custody officer
- Check custody record (esp to identify the “relevant time” and reasons and authorizations for arrest / dtention without charge)
- Speak with the IOs and ask them to disclose all the evidence against the suspect
What is the minimum standard of police disclosure to the defence solicitor?
Sufficient knowledge of the case to enable them to
1. Understand the nature of the offence
2. Understand why the client is a suspect, and
3. Effectively exercise the rights of the defence
Key consideration for defence solicitor during police disclosure?
Identify if any evidence disclosed is: (i) weak; (ii) inadmissible; or (iii) open to challenge about the way the evidence was obtained
All conversations between an IO and a suspect are a police interview. True or false?
False. An informal conversation between an IO and a suspect is permitted provided it does not relate to the offence under investigation (e.g. verifying someone’s identity).
What is the key question for the CO in deciding whether to interview a suspect?
Is the suspect fit to be interviewed? There is an ongoing duty to prevent the interview from starting or continuing if the CO considers that the interview would cause significant harm or distress to the interviewee’s physical or mental state.
Summarize five key aspects of the defence solicitor’s role.
- Introduction (identify, explain representation is free)
- Explain (evidence and reason for arrest)
- Information-gathering from the client
- Welfare assessment (healthcare professional needed?)
- Advice, especially for police interview
What are the four options the client can choose during the police interview, based on the solicitor’s advice?
- Answer all questions.
- No comment (but note adverse inferences may be drawn)
- Selective answers (court may infer they have something to hide)
- No comment + written statement setting out facts that they will rely on at trial (AIs should not be drawn if statement is comprehensive)
When must the IO caution the suspect?
At the start of the interview and whenever the interview recommences after a break
There are two types of cautions. What are the two key differentiating factors?
- Whether or not adverse inferences can be drawn from silence, and relatedly,
- whether or not the suspect has been offered and/or received legal advice
When is a recording of an interview compulsory? What two steps must the defence take with respect to the recording?
Whenever the interview is in connection with an indictable or either-way offence.
Defence must review the written summary of the recorded interview to check its accuracy: (1) if defence agrees, written summary will be part of evidence in the case; and (2) if defence disagrees, recording will be transcribed in full for use at trial
Overarching requirement of fairness in police interviews?
Police cannot abuse their position of trust by conducting the interview in an oppressive manner.
Must police officers always disclose their name during interviews?
Not if they reasonably believe that disclosure may put them in danger–they can alternatively use their warrant or other identification numbers and the name of their police station.
When can a solicitor be excluded from a police interview?
When the solicitor’s conduct is UNREASONABLY OBSTRUCTING proper questions being put to the suspect or the suspect’s response being recorded.
Four options open to police after an interview? How can defence solicitor influence these decisions?
- Charge suspect if there is sufficient evidence
- Divert suspect from prosecution by offering a caution
- Detain suspect without charge to continue investigation
- Release suspect on police bail
Defence solicitor is entitled to make representations to the police about what action should be taken in the case, and these must be recorded in the csutody record.
If suspect is not charged, what 3 options can police take after the interview?
- Release without charge and on bail
- Keep in police detention pending DPP decision
- Release without charge and on bail if preconditions satisfied
- Release without charge and without bail if preconditions for bail not satisfied
What are the 3 scenarios where the CO can make the charging decision instead of referring to the CPS?
- Summary-only offence (including criminal damage if the value of loss/damage < GBP 5000), irrespective of plea
- Attempted or actual retail theft, irrespective of plea, if it can be sentenced in a MC
- Either-way offence which is (1) anticipated as raising a guilty plea (2) suitable for sentencing in an MC (3) not subject to any exceptions (e.g. GBH)
What are the 3 options where the CO has decided there is sufficient evidence to charge the suspect but the final decision needs to be taken by the CPS?
- Detain in custody
- Release without charge
- Release on bail (conditional or otherwise)
Which 4 scenarios permit conditions to be attached to pre-charge bail?
Necessary to prevent suspect from
1. failing to surrender to custody
2. Committing an offence while on bail
3. Obstructing course of justice (e.g. interfering with witnesses)
OR
- Conditions are necessary for suspect’s welfare
What are the two possible time limits for pre-charge bail?
Substantive threshold?
Default is** 28 days**
May be extended by a maximum of** 3 months** if authorised by an officer of at least superintendent rank
Pre-charge bail may only be used if necessary and proportionate in all the circumstances-otherwise presumption is that people will be released without bail
3 most common situations where CO can refuse post-charge bail?
Reasonable grounds for believing:
1. Defendant will fail to appear in court
2. Arrest was for imprisonable offence and detention necessary to prevent D from committing offence OR Arrest was not for imprisonable offence but detention necessary to prevent D causing physical injury or property damage
3. Detention necessary to prevent interference with administration of justice or witnesses
What is the one situation where the defendant cannot be granted bail?
Charge of murder
Safeguard where bail is denied to a defendant in custody?
Must appear before a MC as soon as practicable
Once a suspect is informed he might be prosecuted, no further questions may be asked of him except in which 3 scenarios?
Interview necessary to:
1. prevent or minimise harm or loss to some other person
2. Clarify ambiguity in previous statement
3. Serve the Interests of justice because D should have the opportunity to comment on information concerning the offence which came to light since they were informed they might be prosecuted
What is the difference between a known and unknown suspect?
Known suspect - police have sufficient information to justify the arrest of a particular person for suspected involvement in an offence.
Unknown suspect - no particular person has been identified
What are two common ways that police may ask witnesses to identify an unknown suspect?
- Take witness to a particular place
- Show selection of photographs from the Police National Computer
Three safeguards when showing witness selection of photographs from Police National Computer?
- Show 12 photos at a time depicting person of similar age, appearance and ethnicity to suspect
- Avoid prompting or guiding the witness in any way
- If witness makes a positive identification, no other witness can be shown the set and each witness should be asked to attend a parade
What is the consequence of showing a witness photos if the suspect is known and available?
This would render any formal identification procedure irrelevant and admission of evidence from that procedure may be challenged as unfair for breach of Code D / S,78 PACE.
When is an identification procedure mandatory (2 conditions)? Two exceptions?
- Eyewitness believes they have identified a suspect at the crime scene
- Suspect denies being the person allegedly seen by the witness
Exceptions where: (i) not practicable to conduct the procedure; or (ii) would serve no useful purpose
Four types of formal identification under Code D?
A. Video identification (must show at least 8 others)
B. Identification parades (at least 8 people in addition to, and resembling the suspect)
C. Group identification (does not require suspect’s consent)
D. Confrontation
Six warnings / explanations of rights prior to conducting an identification procedure?
- Free legal advice
- Have a solicitor or friend present
- Does not have to consent or cooperate but refusal can be used in evidence against them
- Significant alterations of appearance may be used in evidence against them
- Whether police showed any photographs or photofit before hand
- Police can proceed covertly even if suspect refuses to cooperate
What should the defence do where police obtain identification evidence in breach of the Code?
Apply to exclude it under S.78 of PACE on the ground of unfairness.
Court will then decide if the admission of evidence would be so prejudicial on the fairness of the trial that it should be excluded.
Is suspect’s consent required to take fingerprints?
No.
When can police take fingerprints away from the police station (2 conditions)?
- Reasonably suspects that the person is committing or attempting to commit an offence, or has already done so
- Officer cannot reasonably ascertain the name of the person
Four safeguards to take fingerprint or footwear without consent?
- Only such reasonable force as is necessary
Suspect must be informed:
2. Why fingerprints are being taken
3. The grounds relied on to take fingerprints
4. Fingerprints may be retained and be the subject of a speculative search
What kind of offences permit the police to take forensic sample without consent?
Recordable offence: (i) conviction may be recorded in national police records and (ii) possible sentence of imprisonment upon conviction
In which 2 scenarios may a non-intimate sample be taken without consent?
- Suspect is arrested and detained, or charged, in connection with a recordable offence and no sufficient or suitable sample has been taken
- Suspect has been convicted or cautioned and since then, no suufficient or suitable sample has been taken AND an office ranked inspector or above has authorized the taking as necessary to assist in preventing or detecting crime
Five safeguards to take a non-intimate sample without consent?
- Only use such reasonable force as is necessary
- Reason for taking sample is disclosed
- Grounds on which authority has been given are disclosed
- Suspect informed that sample may be retained and subject of a speculative search
- Record must be made of the reasons and any relevant circumstances (e.g. if force is used)
When may an intimate sample be taken without consent?
Never
Four requirements before taking intimate sample?
- Authorized by a police officer of at least the rank of inspector
- Officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting: (i) the person to be involved in a RECORDABLE offence; and (ii) the sample would confirm or disprove the suspect’s involvement
- Written consent must be obtained
- Sample taken by healthcare professional
Solicitor should warn client that adverse inference may be drawn by magistrate or jury at trial if he refuses
What is facial mapping?
Comparing digital image to the suspect (usually using expert evidence on photographic technology and anatomical features_
3 situations where the police may decide the charge instead of the CPS?
- Summary-only offence irrespective of plea (including criminal damage of less than GBP 5000)
- Retail theft or attempted retail theft irrespective of plea, if suitable for sentencing by MC
- Either-way offence anticipated as a guilty plea and suitable for sentence in a MC
What are the two considerations when the CPS (or the CO) decides whether to prosecute under the Full Code Test?
- Sufficient evidence to provide for a realistic prospect of conviction
- It is in the public interest to prosecute
Which 4 conditions must be satisfied to detain a suspect in custody even if there is insufficient evidence to charge him (Threshold Test)?
- Insufficient evidence to apply the EVIDENTIAL STAGE of the Full Code Test
- Reasonable grounds to believe that FURTHER EVIDENCE will be available within a REASONABLE period
- SERIOUSNESS or circumstance of the case justifies making an immediate charging decision
- There are CONTINUING SUBSTANTIAL grounds to OBJECT TO BAIL
At what juncture are the Threshold and Full Code Tests respectively applied?
Threshold Test must be continually kept under review to ensure that the charge is appropriate and the continued objection to granting bail is justified.
Full Code Test must be applied as soon as reasonably practicable and before the end of D’s custody time limit,
Four considerations for the CPS when selecting charges?
- Seriousness and extent of the offending
- Give court adequate powers to sentence and impose postconviction orders
- Allow a confiscation order to be made in appropriate cases (i.e. where D has benefited from criminal conduct)
- Enable case to be presented in clear and simple way
What are the two out of court disposal options and what is the main difference between them?
Simple and conditional cautions.
Simple cautions are not available for most INDICTABLE offences (unless there are exceptional circumstances and the DPP consents)
Four common requirements for simple and conditional cautions?
- Sufficient evidence for prosecution
- Offender admits guilt
- Public interest in giving a caution
- Offender consents after being told that the caution may be cited in court if they offend in the future
What are two consequences of a conditional caution?
- Failure to comply with conditions of the caution renders offender liable for PROSECUTION for the original offence
- Conditional caution will form part of offender’s RECORD and can be cited in future criminal proceedings
In which court(s) do offenders usually make their first court appearance?
Magistrate’s court for Ds 18 and over (youth court, for those aged 17 and below)
Six considerations for defence lawyer at the outset of a criminal case?
- Funding (representation order or private funding)
- Pre-trial disclosure from the CPS
- Written evidence from client
- Guilty plea - advise based on prosecution evidence
- Indictment or summary trial for either-way offences
- Court bail
3-step procedure where the defendant pleads guilty for a summary offence?
- Prosecutor tells magistrates facts of the case
- Defence solicitor makes mitigation plea
- Magistrate sentence (usually same day unless pre-sentence report required)
3-step procedure where the defendant pleads not guilty for a summary offence?
- Fix trial dates
- Issue case management directions on Preparation for Effective Trial Form
- Whether to release on bail or remand in custody, if case is adjourned
What is the main procedural difference when the defendant is charged with an indictable only offence vs an either-way offence?
Indictable offences are sent directly from the MC to the Crown Court for trial.
Either-way offences begin with the PbV (Plea before Venue)
When may summary offences be sent to the Crown Court?
- Must arise out of circumstances which are the same as or connected with those giving rise to the indictable-only offence
AND
2. Punishable with imprisonment OR
3. involve disqualification from driving
What are the two tests that apply for publicly-funded legal representation?
- Interests of Justice test
- Means test
How does the specific charge affect the interests of justice test?
If the offence is indictable-only and sent to Crown Court, automatically satisfied
If the offence is summary-only or either-way, then the interests of justice criteria must be considered (e.g. possible damage to D’s reputation or livelihood)
Which applicants automatically qualify for the means test (3 criteria)?
- Under 18
- Receiving main welfare benefits
- Applicants with income under a certain threshold, who do not own a house and have no savings/investments
When is a partner’s income not included in the means assessment?
When the partner has a contrary interest in the dispute in respect of which the application is made