02. Constitutional Law Flashcards
What three overarching considerations must be applied when considering an application for judicial review?
- Procedure (apply to Administrative Court)
- Scope of JR only applies to public bodies and secondary/delegated legislation; not primary legislation
- Subject matter must be public, not privat elaw
3 procedural requirements for JR?
- Administrative Court (within KB Div of High Court)
- Serve claim form for JR on defendant
- Permission for JR must be obtained from High Court
3 tests for standing?
- Sufficient interest/locus standi
- Person aggrieved (applies only to S.288 Town and Country Planning Act 1990): must have a subsisting interest in the affected land
- Victim test (applies only under HRA 1998): claimant is or would be victim of unlawful act by public body
3 timing-related prerequisites for general JR? What happens if you do not comply?
- Exhaustion of remedies (e.g. statutory appeals or tribunal appeals)
- Promptly
- Not later than 3 months after the date of the judgment, order or conviction
If not complaint, must apply for extension of time together with application for leave for JR
Time limit for JR of planning or procurement decisions?
6 weeks from the date the claim arose for planning decision and 30 days from actual or constructive knowledge, for procurement
What is the test for amenability to JR?
The decision under review must be taken or made by a public body, i.e.
1. Established by statute
2. Otherwise exercising a public function
What are the two purposes of the doctrine of non-justiciability?
- Mark out certain exercises of public power as non-reviewable on any ground
- Mark out certain grounds of review as unavailable when reviewing the exercise of a particular public power
What are 3 non-justiciable public powers?
- Prerogative of mercy
- Grant of honours by the monarch
- Public policy directions (e.g. funding of local authorities)
What is the exclusivity rule. One clarification?
A claimant relying on public law rights must proceed by way of JR. However, a defendant can rely on an issue of public law as a defence in ordinary civil proceedings.
6 high-level examples of illegality?
- Exceeding a conferred power
- Unlawful sub-delegation
- Error of law or fact
- Failure to consider relevant factors or considering irrelevant factors
- Fettering of discretion (internal policies must be subject to exceptions and permit authorities to consider each case on its own merits)
- Improper purposes
How is the test of improper purposes applied?
- Subjective intention or motive of the decisionmaker
- If the decision has more than one purpose, the primary purpose or material influence test is applied
Two tests of irrationality? Why is this considered to be an intrusive form of JR?
- Wednesbury unreasonableness
- Proportionality of the exercise of power to the objective being pursued
Looks to the merits of the decision rather than its procedural or legal basis
What are the two types of statutory procedural requirements when considering JR on the ground of procedural impropriety?
- Mandatory - any violation will invalidate the decision
- Directory - requires only substantial compliance and claimant must show some prejudice
4 important procedural requirements for public decisions (JR)?
- Do not show actual or apparent BIAS
- Fair HEARING (including oral hearing or reasons, if an LE exists)
- Give REASONS ONLY if implied by common law (usually if there is an important interest or trigger factor) or imposed by statute
- Undertake any CONSULTATION properly
4 requirements for legitimate expectations
- Express, unambiguous and unqualified representation
- Claimant has an interest in an eventual benefit it expected to attain or retain
- Decision-maker had the legal power to make the representation
- Claimant reasonably relied on it to his detriment
Difficulty in relying on public body’s past practice when claiming LE for JR?
Must show that deviation from policy amounted to an abuse of power
Two options open to court under HRA?
S.3 confers de facto permission to JR Acts of Parliament without striking down
S.4 allows courts to issue rulings that legislation is incompatible with ECHR
What is certiorari? Two different consequences?
A quashing order that nullifies a public body’s decision. Court may (1) send case back to decision-maker with a direction to remake the decision or (2) substitute original decision for its own
When are damages available in JR?
Very limited; only if there is: (1) a private law cause of action or (2) a claim under the HRA