Court Cases - Ch. 19 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q
  • communist charged/ convicted of criminal anarchy
  • conviction upheld but S.C. Applied q4th amendment due process to 1st amendment (selective incorporation) for future cases
A

Gitlow v New York

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Supreme Court struck down NY state board of regents approved prayer for schools (Establishment Clause)
Even applies when offered on voluntary basis

A

Engel v Vitale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Moment of silence ruled unconstitutional due to “meditation or voluntary prayer” statement

A

Wallace v Jaffree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Equal Access Act of 1984 ruled constitutional
Student formed Christian clubs allowed by courts
School required to allow use of facilities

A

Westside Community Schools v Mergens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Supreme Court struck down PA law providing reimbursements to price schools for teacher salaries, textbooks, materials in non-religious courses
Court ruled it directly benefitted parochial schools and required entanglement with religion. Lemon Test created. Establishment clause.

A

Lemon v Kurtzman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Florida outlaws animal sacrifices as part of church service

Law intended for certain religious group so struck down by Supreme Court

A

Lukumi Babalu Aye v City of Hialeah

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Requirement to salute flag in school. Gobitis children were expelled when refused.
Court said not infringement but lawful promotion of patriotism and unity

A

Minersville v Gobitis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Overturned Gobitis decision; S.C held compulsory flag saluting was unconst.

A

West VA BOE v Barnette

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Got rid of “Clear and Present Danger Test” and replaced it w/ Imminent Lawless Action
Gave citizens protection in speech
Court ruled the advocation for lawless action in a way that is likely to produce action can be punished

A

Brandenburg v Ohio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Upheld Espionage act of 1917; no free speech during wartime; clear and present danger test; replaced by imminent lawless action test

A

Schenck v United States

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Overturned the Dennis decision; used Clear and Present Danger Test but ruled that there was a difference between encouraging action and belief; limited the scope of smith act (made it worthless)

A

Yates v United States

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Scouts recognized right of a free press to publish the pentagon papers in spite of claims that they threatened national security by Nixon; court ruled that 1st amendment was superior to most claims by govt

A

New York Times v United States

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

School newspaper was not guaranteed the same level of 1st amendment protections as one created mainly for student expression (not a “public forum”)

A

Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ruling on the communication decency act of 1996; words “indecent” and “patently offensive” were too vague and denied adults access to protected materials

A

Reno v American Civil Liberties Union

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Applied 1st amend protections to students in public schools; the wearing of armbands was not disruptive enough to warrant prohibition (the Tinker test)

A

Tinker v Des Moines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Court struck down law prohibiting desecration of American Flags; flag burning is protected speech; application of 1at amendment to non-soeech expression (informed by Tinker)

A

Texas v Johnson

17
Q

Court overturn convictions of Gregory on a basis of:
Denial of due process no evindent to support disorderly conduct charges
They were convicted for demonstrating, not disobeying police orders
They were convicted for engaging in protected acts
Court also pointed out that Gregory had been arrested based on the actions of bystanders

A

Gregory v Chicago

18
Q

Right of associationto allowing a private org. to exclude people that are not in line with group’s public/private viewpoints (expressive activity)

A

Boy Scouts of America v Dale