couples therapy Flashcards
main differences between Johnson, Gottman, and Wile’s couples therapy
Susan Johnson: constantly looking for attachment, looking for places where couples do not have each other’s back, places where they are not fully trustworthy with each other
Gottman: research based, has a lot of good data about what works and what does not work in couples therapy, systemic in nature
Wile: examples where couples go from angry to cooperative, collaborative couples therapy
basics of couples therapy
Balance
-How to avoid championing one side?
-Have to like both members of the couple
Communication
-How are emotions affecting what is said/heard?
Family of Origin
-What are the relational introjects?
-Where is all this anger coming from
Sense of commitment
-How satisfied and intimate are they?
three “don’ts” in couples therapy
Don’t intervene too Quickly
-Why—balance will be upset by a quick jump to one position.
-Get the data first
Don’t answer questions until
-You know exactly that your answer will not alienate you from one member of the couple.
Don’t remain the abstract
-“What if the sense of commitment is cool and I can’t be sure of my footing all the time?”
-Translation needed.
explain small problems in couples therapy
While it sounds trite, sometimes we do need baby steps to form a test case of the couple’s intent.
-Date night is a classic intervention for a reason, it is really useful sometimes, find time for people to spend time to talk about things other than the anger or the kids if that is a part of the problem
-A lot of Gottman’s research talks about the initial response from partners, you walk in angry from grad school and your partner is there and they say something that makes you pissed because you are already in a bad mood
Don’t assume that members of a couple see the problem in the same way.
-Some people who feel the same about arguing might mean that arguing might be a good thing, arguing is not necessarily bad
explain the bi-lateral intervention
doing an intervention that involves both parties, not blaming one party
Tom, when you make a face, even if it really is based on confusion, it results in you, Beth, pulling away and feeling defeated, which you, Tom, then see as confirmation that you can “do nothing right.”
what should you avoid getting hooked in
the past
-Stay present, if possible
–Listen politely if it needs to be stated.
-If paralyzing the couple, consider the Empathy Expansion Procedure (Browning)
-When people apologize for what they did that made the other feel that way, not just apologizing for the other person’s feelings
what should therapists ask about and consider in couples therapy
people’s theories
-You want to keep people’s language separate from one side or the other stating “the truth.”
-Truth is contextual, especially in couple’s relationships.
who controls the affect in couples therapy
the therapists
-Certainly each member of the couple might bring their own affect into the session, but, you, the therapist should be able to either raise affect or lower it, depending on the goal you are working toward.
-Nothing gained by watching couples go back and forth with sarcasm and belittling comments
explain the problem in couples therapy
Both sides of any issue are necessary
-With any problem there are always at least two sides
-Some therapists like to find a problem that people can both agree on being a problem, other people are fine working with two problems
How is each person “part of the problem?”
What is the history of the problem?
-If there have been problems for 7+ years therapy probably will not cut it, not necessarily give up on them right away, but have to look for exceptions where the problem did not exist, if they say no then it probably will be too big of a challenge
explain solutions in couples therapy
-What has been tried?
-Is there a lesson learned, or, can the solution be employed again?
things to consider about goals in couples therapy
-Is a single goal possible?
-If separate goals were achieved, would this course of action help the couple?
-Is there anyone who is working against the goal? In other words, might an in-law or child be invested in seeing the goal not succeed?
stresses and resources
An obvious question to ask, but, a necessary one. Some couples are defeated by an outside stress, and other couples are salvaged by a previously unutilized resource.
individual pathology in couples therapy
Is one member suffering from a mechanistic concern that calls for a psychiatric referral, separate individual treatment, or sub-systems sessions?
-If someone’s anxiety or depression is so profound maybe refer to individual treatment, especially if you see the other partner trying, worried unless we address your anxiety in individual therapy, then we can return to doing couples work
defining communication style
Come up with a short hand to describe the systemic pattern that they engage in. For example, “Bill tries to be logical, and gets pedantic, while, Julia tries to argue then moves to emotional attacks. Resulting in Bill calling Julia ‘hysterical’ and Julia referring to Bill as ‘a robot.”
explain the issue of sexuality
-A resource for the couple
-Diagnostic information
-Small problem to be address
-Referral for Sex Therapy