Costs and Access of Health Care in the US Flashcards
Costs and access health care in the US
- Make sure not reiterating previous presentations too much
- Correlate w QOD
- Consider keeping slides but not discussing in class – they are supplemental, extra, not included on exams, but available for those wanting more thorough coverage.
Methods of Paying for Health Care
- 1.out-of-pocket
- 2.individual private Insurance
- 3.employment based group private insurance – this is the bismark system for a national plan
- 4.government financing
- Which of the 4 models of how a country organizes its health care systems (for each):
- 1.out-of-pocket (all may have some component, out of pocket if no insurance or govt program, also may be part of insurance and govt programs (i.e. co-pays, deductibles) in Bismark (prvt insurance) and National Health Insurance systems)
- 2.individual private Insurance (hybrid of out of pocket national systems – individual is paying the entire cost of the insurance, basically paying for their health care) and Bismark, and may supplement government programs (i.e. Medigap or Medicare Part D – Pharmacy coverage)
- 3.employment based group private insurance (Bismark – pure and simple)
- 4.government financing (Beveredge – VA, and National Health Insurance - CMS (Medicare and Medicaid)
- National Models of Health Care Systems
- 1.Beveredge –socialized medicine for veterans, military, Native Americans (VAH, IHS, Military Health System). (4)
- 2.Bismark – social insurance for most people with jobs (BC/BS, Aetna, Kaiser, etc.) (3)
- 3.National Health Insurance - for Americans over the age of 65, some who are poor or disabled (Medicare, Medicaid) (mainly
- 4.Out of Pocket – for those who don’t qualify or have health insurance, or can pay (cash) (1, and others to some degree – i.e. co-pays w private insurance (Bismark) or National Health Insurance (Medicare copays)
out of pocket (direct purchase)
- 11.8% of national expenditures in 2010 (Over 80% of this category is from people with employer sponsored health insurance and Medicare)
- (The maximum out-of-pocket cost limit for any individual Marketplace plan for 2015 can be no more than $6,600 for an individual plan and $13,200 for a family plan.)
- Health care as a “commodity”
- Out-of-pocket expenditures per capita: Out-of-pocket payments include the patients’ share of payment for the provision of health care services and prescriptions covered by insurance; this includes any copayments, coinsurance payments, or deductible payments. If an insurance claim was not filed (for example, for the purchase of over-the-counter medicines), the expenditures are not included in this metric. HCCI calculated out-of-pocket expenditures per capita by dividing total out-of-pocket expenditures by the total insured population.
individual private insurance
- Individual health insurance is coverage that is purchased on an individual or family basis, as opposed to being offered by an employer.
- Before PPACA and Marketplaces, approximately 5% of population.
- For people who either don’t have employment based insurance or don’t want it
- Changing rapidly with ACA – anyone can buy insurance in federal or state marketplaces
employment based private insurance
- Employers pay most or much of the premium that purchases the insurance
- Covers just under half of US population
- Tax deductible expense
- Contributes to rising costs of health care
- Why would employment based private insurance contribute to rising costs?
- People don’t pay directly for services
- People get more care than they need – no incentive to not be wasteful.
- May get more insurance than needed – as tax free for employers and employees.
- More next week…
governmnet financing
- Pays for almost two-thirds of health care in the US
- Covers about a third of people
- Old, poor, special groups
- At $5,960 per capita, government spending on health care costs in the U.S. was the highest of any nation in 2013, including countries with universal health programs such as Canada, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
- Estimated total U.S. health spending for 2013 was $9,267 per capita, with government’s share being $5,960.
- government health spending in the United States exceeded total health spending (government plus private) in every other country except Switzerland
- Americans pay the world’s highest health-related taxes –despite popular perception that the U.S. health care financing system is predominantly private
- Direct government payments for programs including Medicare, Medicaid and the Veterans Administration accounted for 47.8 percent of overall health spending.
- government outlays for public employees’ private health insurance coverage was $188 billion, or 6.4 percent of total spending
- tax subsidies to health care was $294.9 billion, or 10.1 percent of the total
- David U. Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler. The Current and Projected Taxpayer Shares of US Health Costs. American Journal of Public Health: March 2016, Vol. 106, No. 3, pp. 449-452.
- More later…
- What are they?
- Eligibility criteria for each?
- Medicare, Medicaid (MediCal), VA, IHS
factors associated with HC costs
- Income
- Age
- Disease prevalence
- Determinants of health
- Genetics
- Behaviors
- Environment in which individuals live and work
- The social and economic environment in the community
Additional factors influencing costs of health care
- prevalence of insurance coverage
- information gaps in health care
- supply and mix of services
- new technology
- Payment incentives driving volume
- Regulatory issues
- Quality and safety
- Malpractice litigation risks
increasingly expensive population
- Aging population
- Nearly half the U.S. population has one or more chronic conditions, among them asthma, heart disease or diabetes,
- Behavioral factors
- Two-thirds of adults are either overweight or obese
- We’re growing older, sicker and more overweight.
- As we get older, we tend to need more medical care. The baby boom generation is heading into retirement, with enrollment in Medicare set to grow by an average of 1.6 million people annually. Additionally, nearly half the U.S. population has one or more chronic conditions, among them asthma, heart disease or diabetes, which drive up costs. And two-thirds of adults are either overweight or obese, which can also lead to chronic illness and additional medical spending.
why do we pay so much for health care
- higher administrative costs
- complicated system for billing
- a 2-to-1 ratio of specialists to primary care physicians
- more standby capacity
- more malpractice claims
- less social support for the poor
- higher drug prices
- higher health care worker incomes
- ØFee-for-service; complicated system for billing, lack of cost consideration by consumers, tax breaks
- ratio of specialists to primary care physicians. In other countries the ratio is 50-50. Specialists spend more money and use more exotic interventions and also get paid more per hour of work
- more standby capacity. The United States has 4.2 times as many MRI scanners as Canada. less social support for the poor.
- Some of the additional spending comes about because we readmission rates, due to less social support services, home care, primary care
additional factors contributing to the rising costs of health care in the US
- Technology
- Prices are higher
- Supply-driven demand of services
- Price insensitivity to end consumer
- Judgment based nature of physician care —practice variation
- Values and culture
Fee for service
- Fee-for-service – reimburses for each visit, procedure, and test
- We pay our doctors, hospitals and other medical providers in ways that reward doing more, rather than being efficient.
- Most insurers — including traditional Medicare — pay doctors, hospitals and other medical providers under a fee-for-service system that reimburses for each test, procedure or visit. Coupled with a medical system that is not integrated, this encourages overtreatment, including repetitive tests, the report says. New efforts in the federal health law and among some private insurers aim to move payments toward a flat rate for a specific condition, such as a knee replacement, or for a patient’s entire episode of care, in order to streamline costs. Medical systems and doctors are also looking to electronic medical records as a way to improve coordination and reduce unnecessary, repeated tests.
Lack of transparency about cost and qualitym compounded by limited data to inform consumer choice
- Examples of hospital charges:
- $37.50/tablet acetaminophen (Tylenol) in hospital charge
- $7.00 each for alcohol prep pad.
- $308.00 for four boxes of 24 sterile 4X4 gauze pads
- 1999, average charges billed to Medicare were equal to 104 percent of the cost to provide medical care, according to a report issued last June by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, an expert panel that counsels Congress. By 2010, the ratio had more than doubled to 218 percent.
- If gas stations worked like health care, you wouldn’t find out until the pump switched off whether you paid $3 or $30 a gallon. If clothes shopping worked like health care, you might pay $80 for a pair of jeans at your local boutique and $400 for the identical pair at the nearest department store—and the clothes wouldn’t have price tags on them.
- Consumers Report (http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2012/07/that-ct-scan-costs-how-much/index.htm)
- New drug for Hep C - if taken by everyone who should take it, would cost Americans more per year than all other brand-name drugs combined. As long as Sovaldi, remains under patent, Gilead Sciences, can charge whatever it wants. At the moment that’s $1,000 per pill, or $84,000 to $150,000 for a course of treatment.
- http://sandiegofreepress.org/2013/03/how-hospitals-mark-up-the-cost-of-over-the-counter-supplies-like-aspirin-and-q-tips-as-much-as-1000/
what is the source of 1/4 of the excess costs of health spending
ADMIN
theoretic model: health care costs and health outcomes
- As costs increase, initially and/or for some investments there is dramatic improvements in health (i.e. childhood immunizations, dietary supplementation).
- As interventions become more expensive, may be more marginal improvements in health, diminishing returns (i.e. expensive treatments for end stage cancer, prolongation of anencephalic infant)
- However, if we can shift off this curve, by greater efficiency or productivity, we can get better health outcomes for same cost.
- So, eliminating those parts of cost that are expensive but have limited value can allow greater resources to go towards those with greater bang for the buck.
- But – importantly – this implies that we are interested in the health of the overall population, not of an individual. A very expensive might be good for the health of a single person, but not make much difference for the health of the population the person is a member of.
cost control
- Control price inflation
- Eliminate ineffective and inappropriate care
- Reduce administrative waste
- Innovations
- Prevention
- Prioritization and cost effectiveness analysis
- 1.regulate drug and procedure prices
- 2.Using EBM to utilize best practices
- 3.As much as 31% of US HC spending on services like insurance marketing, billing, claims, processing, and utilization review. (provider offices and orgs costs…)
- 4.New technologies and drugs – but final analysis may reveal increased utilization wiping out lower global costs
- 5.Some initiatives very cost effective (immunizations), some not so much (BP and breast CA screening and treatment)
- 6.CEA must be done through an ethical lens, and have to accept a population rather than individual perspective
purpose of health insurance
- To protect individuals and families from high (and catastrophic) or unexpected health care expenses.
- The cost for this protection is paid as a monthly premium or annual tax.
- Indemnify. To compensate for loss; to provide security for financial reimbursement for costs incurred by health care expenses.
- Disability insurance is NOT health insurance! That’s to generate your income!!
Company worker insurance: 1870s
Railroad, mining, and other industries begin to provide company doctors funded by deductions from workers’ wages.
healthcare in the 1900 - 1910
- 1900s - US lags behind Europe in finding value in insuring against the costs of sickness.
- 1901 - AMA reorganizes as the national organization increases from 8,000 physicians in 1900 to 70,000 in 1910 – half the physicians in the country (beginning of “organized medicine”).
- Surgery common, especially for removing tumors, infected tonsils, appendectomies, and gynecological operations.
- Doctors are no longer expected to provide free services to all hospital patients
1910 - 1920
- Progressive reformers argue for health insurance, seems to be gaining support.
- Opposition from physicians and other interest groups, and the entry of the US into the war in 1917 distract attention from the reform effort.
- Efforts to establish compulsory health insurance programs fail in 16 states.
1920s - political complacency
- Higher cost of medical care is a new and dramatic development, especially for the middle class
- Growing cultural influence of the medical profession - physicians’ incomes are higher and prestige is established
- 1929—schoolteachers arrange for Baylor Hospital in Dallas, TX, to provide room, board, and specified services at a predetermined monthly cost. This plan is considered the forerunner of Blue Cross plans
1930s
- The Depression changes priorities, greater emphasis on unemployment insurance and “old age” benefits
- Social Security Act is passed, omitting health insurance
- Push for health insurance within the Roosevelt Administration
- Blue Cross begins offering private coverage for hospital care in dozens of states
1940s - companies offer health benefits
- Prepaid group healthcare begins (Kaiser)
- 1943—War Labor Board rules wage freeze does not apply to fringe – employers offer health benefits, giving rise to the employer-based system in place today.
- President Roosevelt asks Congress for “economic bill of rights,” including right to adequate medical care.
- President Truman offers national health program plan, proposing a single system that would include all of American society.
- Truman’s plan is denounced by AMA, and is called a Communist plot by a House subcommittee.
1950s
- National health care expenditures are 4.5 percent of the Gross National Product.
- Reliance on system of private insurance for those who can afford it and welfare services for the poor
- Federal responsibility for the sick poor is firmly established
- Up to 18% now, projected to be almost 20% in the next few years
1960s - cost of hospital care
- DOUBLED
- Over 700 companies were selling health insurance
- Unemployed, especially the elderly, were having difficulty affording insurance
- President Lyndon Johnson signed Medicare and Medicaid into law (Title XVIII and Title XIX of the Social Security Act)
1978 - pregnancy coverage
- 1978—Pregnancy Discrimination Act amends Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Requires that employers treat disabilities and medical conditions associated with pregnancy and childbirth the same as other disabilities or medical conditions.
1986 - COBRA
- 1986—Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) requires employers with 20 or more employees to offer continued health coverage to terminated employees and dependents for a specified period (18 or 36 months).
- Required to provide but not pay for it … thus doubling, tripling, or increasing costs even more for terminated employees.
1996 - HIPAA
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) sets national nondiscrimination and “portability” standards for individual health insurance coverage, HMOs, and group health plans; establishes tax-favored treatment of long-term care insurance. Also regulations placed on standard electronic formats and for the privacy of personal health information.
1996 - mental health parity act
- Mental Health Parity Act requires group plans that offer mental health benefits to provide the same level of coverage for such benefits that they provide for medical and surgical benefits. The act does not apply to groups of fewer than 50 and substance abuse or chemical dependency treatment. The act provides an escape clause for plans in the event plan costs increase more than one percent due to the act. The provisions of this act expired on Sept. 30, 2001.
2000 - electronic processes
- Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act of 2000 gives electronic signatures and records the same weight as written signatures and records, which led to easier administration of electronic benefit, compensation, and human resources systems.