CORRELATIONS Flashcards

1
Q

scatter diagrams can be…

A

Strong positive, Weak positive, No correlation, Strong negative, Weak negative, Perfect positive, Perfect negative.
(degree of correlation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Correlation meaning

A

A relationship between two factors/variables.
It is a statistical technique used to measure or quantify the strength of relationship between two variables.
Two measurements taken from same set of participants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Important to remember:

A

Do not use experimental terminology when talking about correlations, correlations assess relationship between variables, there are NO IVs involved, nothing is manipulated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Analysis of correlation:
Scattergraph

A

A graph that shows correlation between two sets of data/ co-variables by plotting dots to represent each pair of scores.
A line of best fit is then drawn through dots to show trend of data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

positive correlation

A

two variables increase together, not necessarily at same rate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

negative correlation

A

as one variable increases, other decreases-not necessarily at same rate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

no correlation

A

no correlation between two sets of data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

correlation coefficient

A

A number falls between +1 and -1.
Calculated using Spearman’s Rho.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Correlation coefficients

A

Some are written as a positive or a negative correlation with a plus or minus sign before the coefficient (number)
It tells us how closely the co-variables are related.
e.g -0.76 is just as closely correlated as +0.76, its just that -0.76 means as one variable increases the other decreases (negative correlation) and +0.76 means both increase together (positive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

+1 coefficient=

A

perfect positive correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

-1 coefficient=

A

perfect negative correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

0 correlation=

A

no correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Examples of coefficients and their meanings

A

+0.8= strong positive
+0.5= moderate positive
+0.3= weak positive
-0.3= weak negative
-0.5= moderate negative
-0.8= strong negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Directional correlational hypotheses

A

(One tailed)
Predicts direction result will go in.
-‘positive’ or ‘negative’ RELATIONSHIP.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Non directional correlational hypotheses

A

(Two tailed)
Predicts a change but not a direction.
‘there will be a RELATIONSHIP between…’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Null correlational hypotheses

A

(No change predicted)
‘There will be NO RELATIONSHIP’

17
Q

Correlations cannot show cause and effect…

A

Never use words; cause, effect, difference.
Only ever say; relationship.

18
Q

When sketching a scattergraph:

A

Must add a Title.
Have an x and y axis labelled.
Must mention if axis is rounded, e.g ‘data rounded to 1000s’

19
Q

Strength of correlations

A

Quantitative data provides info of patterns and trends, if a correlational study indicates presence or absence of a relationship further investigation can be justified using an experiment.

20
Q

Strength of correlations

A

Correlational studies can be conducted on variables that can be measured but not manipulated, can be used to research topics that are sensitive or otherwise would be unethical- no deliberate manipulation of variables is required.

21
Q

Strength of correlations

A

Procedures can be repeated, findings can be confirmed to check reliability.
(like experiments)

22
Q

Weakness of correlations

A

Correlation is not and cannot be taken to imply causation, even if there is a strong association between 2 variables, we cannot assume one causes another.

23
Q

Weakness of correlations

A

Correlations show linear relationships but do NOT reflect curvilinear ones (if change in variables is not constant) such as effect of stress on exam performance.

24
Q

Weakness of correlations

A

Lacks validity.
Findings are not always valid as they don’t reflect the full picture.

25
Q

Weakness of correlations

A

There may be intervening variables (third variable) that can explain the co-variables being studied are linked. Correlation doesn’t show more than 2 variables.

26
Q

Comparison of experiments and studies using correlational analysis

A

Experiments determine cause + effect because we can observe effect of IV and DV
The procedures can be replicated easily, findings can be confirmed.

Correlations cannot find cause and effect.
There may be other unknown variables that can explain wh co-variables being studied are linked.

27
Q

Comparison of experiments and studies using correlational analysis

A

Correlations can be used when its not possible to manipulate variables.
If no correlation can be found, a causal relationship can be ruled out.

Experiments are often artificial, a contrived situation where ps may not have acted naturally.
Lack ecological validity as we cannot generalise from experimental setting to real world setting.

28
Q

Reliability in correlations

A

In correlational analysis we are concerned about consistency of measures used, findings of correlational analysis will be reliable only if measures of both dependent variables are consistent.
For some correlations, using scientific scales (volume, time etc…) the measures will be highly reliable.

29
Q

Validity in correlations

A

To be valid a correlational analysis must be reliable but other factors affect validity too.
As with reliability findings of correlational analysis will only be valid is both measures of variables measure real phenomena in effective ways.
To achieve this, DV’s must be defined and measured effectively.