Core Studies- Biological Flashcards
Includes: Schatcher & Singer, Dement & Kleitman, and Canli et. al.
Canli et al. Sample
10 right handed female participants, used a volunteer sample
Canli et al. Explain the fMRI technique
Structural images were obtained using eight slices perpendicular to the axial plane of the hippocampus.
11 frames of functional imagery were captured per trial.
Machine: 1.5 Tesla imager was used
“patients are put into a scanner > strong magnetic field causes hydrogen nuclei to react in a particular way > this is recorded by the scanner”
Canli et al. Describe the images & foils used
96 separate scenes from the International Affective Picture System with normative ratings for valence (degree of negativity) and arousal– the ratings had strong corelation of 0.89.
+48 new scenes (foils), matched on valence & arousal ratings
Canli et al. Describe procedure for SHOWING the image
2.88 secs of image, followed by 12.96 secs of “fixation cross: interval” during which they had to rate it.
Randomized order for all images.
Canli et al. Describe both the task & the memory task
They had to rate the image 0-3 (not emotionally intense at all to extremely emotionally intense)
Then, when displayed the scenes + foils, had to indicate if they were shown it or not. If yes, did they “remember” (were certain) or “know” (had a feeling)
Canli et al. 2 aims of the study
To discover:
- Is the amygdala activation different for different intensities of emotion experienced individually?
- Does the degree of amygdala activation / emotional intensity affect ability to recall the stimuli?
Canli Results
High correlation of subjective rating and arousal/valence ratings (-0.66 and 0.68)
Amygdala activation was significantly related to degree of subjective emotional intensity
Scenes that were rated 3 were highly likely to be remembered
If the subjective rating was high but amygdala activation was low, then it was unlikely to be remembered.
Dement and Kleitman Sample
Seven male & two female (originally)
5 studied in detail, 4 were used to confirm the results
Dement and Kletiman aims
Is dream recall different for nREM and REM sleeps?
Do subjective estimates of “dream length” correlate with actual length of REM period?
Does the pattern of eye movement reflect dream content?
Dement and Kleitman materials
EEG: electro encephalogram used to measure the differences in brainwaves to see changes in sleep pattern.
Similar usage of EOG (electro oculogram) was used to measure movement of eyemuscles.
Doorbell sound used to wake participants
Recorder to tell the dream content into
Dement and Kleitman
Procedures
- Woken with a doorbell.
- State if they were having a dream, and then describe the dream into a recorder
- More questions by researchers if neccessary
Dement and Kleitman quantitative results
79.6% of REM HAD dream recall
93% of nREM DID NOT HAVE dream recall
88% correct estimate for 5 minute dreams
Dement and Kleitman Qualitative results
The dream descriptions:
eg: climbing up and down a ladder
watching two people throw tomatoes
driving a car and then suddenly seeing a car to the left
dribbling, looking at the net, and shooting a basketball.
Schatcher and Singer Sample
185 males from University of Minnesota, given course credit for participating.
Checked for health records to make sure epinephrine was okay.
Opportunity sample
Explain “euphoria” condition
> Room is slightly messy, they are told to help themselves to any papers or materials
Stooge introduces himself and make icebreaker comments.
Begins standardized routine of playing with the rubberbands and the hulahoop, inviting the participant to join in.
Stooge does not know what condition the participant is in