Contract Terms (Exclusion Clauses) Flashcards
what is exclusion clauses?
terms in a contract that limit or exclude liability for a breach of contract
businesses limit their liability by:
restricting the value of a claim
excluding claims for defects after 14 days
common law controls
is the agreement signed?
is the clause incorporated?
is the term incorporated through custom or previous dealings?
is the agreement signed? (common law control)
if the contract is signed, the exclusion cause applies. But if the clause has been misrepresented, the courts will interpret that clause in line with the misrepresentation (Le’Estrange v Graucob, Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co)
Le’Estrange v Graucob
facts: Mrs. Graucob bought a vending machine with an exclusion clause.
held: Despite not reading it, the court ruled she was bound by the clause since she signed the contract.
principle: a party who signs a contract is bound by its terms, including exclusion clauses, even if they didnt read/understand them.
Curtis v Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co
facts: Mrs. Curtis’s coat got damaged during cleaning. She sued for damages, saying an exclusion clause wasn’t valid.
held: court agreed, the clause wasn’t part of the contract properly.
principle: Exclusion clauses must be clearly communicated to be valid in a contract.
is the clause incorporated? (common law control)
the clause must be brought to attention before the contract is signed or it will not apply (Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel)
Olley v Marlborough Court Hotel
facts: Mrs. Olley’s fur coat was stolen from her hotel room. She sued for damages, disputing the validity of an exclusion clause.
held: court ruled the clause wasn’t valid as it wasn’t effectively included in the contract.
principle: Exclusion clauses must be clearly communicated during contracting to be valid.
is the term incorporated through custom or previous dealings?
previous dealings can mean an exclusion clause is incorporated, but this must be consistent (Hollier v Rambler Motors, McCutcheon v Davis MacBrayne Ltd)
Hollier v Rambler Motors
facts: Mr. Hollier bought a car with an exclusion clause limiting liability. When the car broke down, he sued for damages.
held: court ruled the clause wasn’t valid because it wasn’t effectively included in the contract.
principle: Exclusion clauses must be clearly communicated during contracting to be valid and enforceable.
Davis MacBrayne Ltd
facts: delays in completing house construction arose due to unforeseen issues.
held: court found the delays were caused by the council’s actions, entitling Davis Contractors to an extension of time.
principle: Delays caused by one party’s actions may entitle the other party to an extension of time under the contract.