Cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Gibson v Manchester City Council

A

facts: the council wrote to Mr. Gibson (council tenant) stating “the Corporation may be prepared to sell the house, if you’d like to make a formal application form’ he did but the council rejected it anyway
held: the council’s letter was not an offer, it was not firm and definite. the application form was the offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

an invitation to treat definition

A

a statement preparatory to making an offer like in Gibson v MCC, or an invitation to make an offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Partridge v Crittenden

A

facts: D placed an advert
D was charged by the RSPCA for unlawfully ‘offering for sale’ a wild live bird (against the Protection of Birds Act 1954)
held: not liable
principle: adverts are not offers, but an invitation to treat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co

A

facts: D advertised a £100 reward in a newspaper for those who, after proper product use, still got influenza.
held: there was a binding contract with Carlill as she accepted the offer and met the specified conditions.
principle: offers can be made to the world in general, anyone can accept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fisher v Bell

A

facts: a shopkeeper was charged for displaying a flick knife in his shop window. The legal question was whether the display constituted an offer for sale (guilty) or an invitation to treat (not guilty).
held: not guilty
principle: displaying goods in a window is not an offer but an invitation to treat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain b Boots Cash Chemists

A

facts: The defendant’s self-service shop sold non-prescription drugs, some on the Poisons List. Customers picked items and paid at the till with a pharmacist. Legal action was initiated for an alleged breach of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1933, requiring pharmacist supervision for listed poisons.
held: not guilty
principle: goods on a shelf are invitations to treat, taking the item to the till is an offer, if the shop agrees to sell the item that is the acceptance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly