Contract Remedies Flashcards
Liquidated Remedies
Compensation that is agreed in advacnce by the parties
- only accepted if representas a accurate an proper assessment of losses - not penalty
Bridge v Campbell
Clause in hire purchase agreement to cover deprecation.
Court held this did not reflect actual depreiactaion so was invalid
Dunlop Tyre v New Garage and Motor Co
Criteria for deciding whether liquiudated damages are extravagant
- Extravangant sum will always be a penalty
- Large sum for small debt = penalty
- Fixed Sum that is used to cover variety of breaches = Penalty
ParkingEye v Beavus 2015
Can enforce penalty clauses if not Unconscionable
- Consider wider commerical context
- Penalty no longer has ot be pre-estimeate of actual loss
- Clause can act as detterent against specefic breach
Nominal Damages
When injured party has valid claim but courts think action shpild not have been brought
Charter v Sullivan
Purcahser of car refused to take delivery, seller had no problem selling it again, so only nominal losses awarded
Substanital Damages
Usual type of damages awarded, used to compensate injured party for actual losses suffered
Wrotham Park Estate v Parkside
instead of calculating how much injured party had lost. Attempts to quantify how much might have been reasonably agreed between parties
Explemlary Damages
In excess of compensation - used to show courts disproval of other parties conduct
Quantum Merit
As Much is deserved
Planche v Colburn
C had contract to write book for £100 upon completion, D cancelled
Court held C was entiteled to recover £50 on quatum merit basis
Golden Victory Case
LOSS OF BARGAIN / EXPECTATION LOSS
Cancellation of charter due to outbreak of Iraq War
HoL held damages should represenat the value of contractual benefits of whihc the claimant had been depreived of by the Breach
Anglia TV v Reed
Reliance Loss
TV company incurred expenses of hiring stagg in order to produce film, Reed pulled out
Court held that damages would be calculated by expenses incurred rather than loss of profit
Victoria v Newamn
Loss of Profit
Victoria was a laundry buissness and had a contract for purchase of boiler to be delivered on specific date, delay caused loss of profit
Court held reasonabley forseeable that loss of profit would flow from breach
British WE v Underground Railway of London
Underground brought defective turbines, they purchased new ones whihcb were more effiecent and covered there losses.
Court held no entitled to damahes as they mitiagted all losses