Actus Reus Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Types of Actus Reus

A

State of Affairs
Surrounding Circumstance
Conduct
Result
Conduct + Result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v White 1910

A

D gave posion to his mother, but she died of a heart attack before it effect.
Established But for Test
Failed - NG

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Padgett 1983

A

D shot V’s father and then used her as a human shield at gun point. He opnened fire on police and when they returned fire they killed her.
Satisfied but for test and was convicted of Murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Legal Causation

A

actions must be the substantial and operating cause + intact chain of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Blaue

A

D stabbed a Jehovah witness, she reufsed a life saving blood transfusion and died. D convicted of murder and thin skull rule expanded to include beleifs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Cheshire 1991

A

V shot by D, was treated in hospital and died of complications that were not diagnosed by doctors.
Despite negligence of doctors, D was still laible as contributed signigicantly to death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Williams & Davies

A

D tried to rob a hitchhiker in car, V jumped from car and died.
D’s conviction were quashed as CoA belived his actions were intervening acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Omissions - Lord Justice Stephen

A

“It is not a crime to cause death or bodily injury even intentionally by any omission”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Pittwood

A

Contract
D was gatekeeper at a level crossing, where he was contractually obligated to close gate, he failed to leading to death of V.
Pitwood guilty of Manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Gibbins & Proctor - Speical Relationships

A

1st D failed to provide food for his child, who then starved to death, due to nature of relationship was criminally liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Gibbins and Proctor - Voluntary Assumption of Care

A

2nd D also failed to provide food as they had done so before it constituted a voluntary assumption of care - Criminally liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Miller

A

Dangerous Situations
D was squatting in a flat and fell asleep with a lit cigerette. When he awoke, he realised mattress was on fire, he moved rooms and made no attempt to seek help or extinguish the fire.
Convicted of Arson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Dytham

A

Official Positions
D was Constable in Uniform and failed to intervene when V was kicked out of nightclub and kicked to death by 3 men.
D charged with wilful misconduct in a public office

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Khan and Khan

A

D sold Heroin to 15yr old who overdosed and died, he made no attempt to help her or find assistance.
D quashed as whether D owed a duty should have been put to Jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Airedale NHS Trust v Bland 1993

A

HoL made distinction between stopping treatment whihc is a lawful omission and postive act to end a persons life which is unlawful.