Constitutional Law Midterm review Flashcards
Can Congress regulate purely local establishment making purely local food? Authority?
Yes. Katzenbach v. McClung
Katzenbach v. McClung allows congress to regulate resteraunts, including sales of services / goods, not just working conditions. T/F
True
How do we know that congress can prohibit certain activities all together? IE: Maybe something congress finds immoral.
Champion v. Ammes
What does CC allow congress to regulate?
- Channels
- Instrumentalities
- Affectation doctrine [Raich & Wickard]
What doctrine should you apply to purely instate activity with NO out of state connections? [Seemingly]
Affectation Doctrine.
1. Gonzalez v. Raich
2. Wickard v. Filburn
Explain affectation doctrine.
“In the aggregate, the effect of seemingly local activities may very well be substantial.”
What sources of authority did the court use in Gonzalez v. Raich?
CC + N&P
Affectation Doctrine
When cc authority attaches, congress power is what?
Plenary
Can congress regulate wages, hours, and working conditions in the resteraunt too? [Authority?]
Yes. U.S. v. Darby
How can congress enact prohibition on eating local deer? [Champion v. Ammes]
Champion v. Ammes. When the good crosses state lines, the market itself can be closed.
Local schemes can be regulated because in the aggregate…
… in the aggregate, they have a substantial effect on IC.
Fed Land authority?
Article 4 Sec 3 Clause II
How can congress regulate digitally printed guns? Authority?
1.
2.
- Jones & Laughlin Steel
- U.S. v. Darby [Better b/c Affectation doctrine]
What if, seller whom is purely local is not selling, but instead, giving them away for free? Can congress still regulate? Authority?
1.
2.
- Wickard v. Filburn
- Gonzalez v. Raich
When money doesn’t change hands in a local scheme, congress can still regulate because there is a….
[Affectation Doctrine]
National market for the goods [wheat, weapons, weed] and therefore this has substantial effect on IC.
Can congress regulate in state travel? Authority?
Shreevport RR case
How to maximize scope of congressional power?
NP + CC
1. McCulloch v. Maryland [1818]
2. U.S. v. Comstock [2010]
What quote is used for NP+CC argument?
Marshall, “Let the end be legitimate, let it be w/ scope of Const., by all app. means, plainly adapted to that end, not prohibited, but in spirit & lttr of Const., are Constitutional.”
DC Power authority?
Article 1 Sec 8 Cl 17.
Is the 10th amendment still read to prevent congress from regulating inside states? [Authority?]
No. U.S. v. Darby
What case in 2000 said that under prong 3 of CC authority, the in state activity has to be “economic?”
U.S. v. Morrison
Can congress compel engagement with commerce?
No. Sebelius
In _____ [1995] the Court held that Congress may regulate only three broad categories of activities.
U.S. v. Lopez
Under ____, in state activity must be economic in nature. [Women’s violence case] 2000
“economic” in nature.
U.S. v. Darby showed what? What test used?
Congress can regulate instate manufacturing that violates FLSA. Affectation doctrine used.
Along the same lines of Darby, what case showed congress can regulate in state manufacturing?
Jones & Laughlin Steel. Used “close & intimate” test.
What is really important about US v. Lopez in 1995?
- Channels
- Instrumentalities
- Affectation Doctrine