Constitutional Law (MBE/MEE) Flashcards
Judicial Power: Scope
Limited to power to review cases and controversies
Eleventh Amendment: States
Prohibits states from being sued for money damages in federal court for violating state law, unless:
(1) State consents to the suit, or
* Federal government is permitted to sue states
(2) Congress chose to abrogate that sovereign immunity through an enumerated power
* Congressional intent to abrogate must be clear
* Must be exercising power under Civil War amendments, i.e., 13th, 14th, 15As
Eleventh Amendment: State Officials
- Bars suits in federal court against state officials for violating state law
- Can generally seek injunctive relief against state officers for violating federal law, but federal courts cannot enjoin state judges or law clerks
- Can seek money damages from a state officer by suing the state officer in her personal capacity. Damages from the state treasury are barred.
Compact Clause
- Compact clause requires states to obtain Congress’s consent for agreements between states that increases political power of compacting states at expense of federal government
- Otherwise, states may generally enter into agreements with each other (i.e., interestate compacts) without permission from the federal government
Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction
- “All cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls and those in which a State shall be a party”
- Congress cannot expand or limit this jurisdiction
Supreme Court Original Jurisdiction: District Court Concurrent Jurisdiction
Congress has granted SCOTUS exclusive jurisdiction over controversies between two or more states, which occur when states seek redress for injuries directly caused by other states. Congress has denied SCOTUS exclusive jurisdiction over all other cases within its original jurisdiction by granting lower federal courts concurrent jurisdiction over:
* Cases involving foreign ambassadors, public ministers, or consuls
* Cases between the United States and a state and
* Cases between a state and citizens of another state or noncitizens.
Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction
Two types:
* By certiorari (discretionary): Only four justices must agree to grant cert (“rule of 4”)
* Direct appeal (mandatory)
Supreme Court Appellate Jurisdiction: AISG
A final state-court judgment resting upon adequate and independent state grounds is not reviewable by Supreme Court.
AISG doctrine applies if the case:
* (i) Is in U.S. Supreme Court;
* (ii) Arises through a writ of cert; and
* (iii) Has already been decided by a state court;
* (iv) Adequate: State law controls decision, regardless of how federal issue would be decided
* (iv) Independent: State court’s ruling does not depend on an interpretation of federal law
Note: Although final state-court judgment that rests on AISG may not be reviewed, Supreme Court may constitutionally review a state court decision to determine whether such grounds exist.
Standing: Requirements
P must establish:
* Injury in fact: Concrete and particularized; actual or imminent
* Causation: Injury caused by D’s violation of constitutional or other federal right
* Redressability: Relief requested must be likely to prevent or redress injury
* “Prudential standing”: P is a proper party to invoke judicial resolution of dispute
Standing: Taxpayer Status
Generally no standing to challenge government allocation of funds, but a taxpayer has standing to:
* Litigate how much is owed on her tax bill; and
* Challenge government expenditures as violating the Establishment Clause
Standing: Third-party standing
Generally no standing to bring lawsuit based on claims of third party, but exceptions include:
* Special relationship between P and 3P (e.g., doctor, school, parent, bartender),
* 3P unable to assert his own rights; or
* Risk that disallowing 3P standing will dilute 3P’s rights
Standing: Organizational Standing
Organization has standing to sue on its own behalf or on behalf of its members if:
* Its individual members would have standing to sue in their own right;
* Claim is related to purpose of organization; and
* Individual members are not necessary to adjudicate claim
Standing: Legislatative Standing
- Legislators lack standing to challenge laws they voted against
- The legislature may have institutional standing if claim has something to do with its institutional functions
Standing: Section 1983 Claims
- Provides a method to enforce substantive rights granted by Constitution and other federal laws
- Color of state law: P must show that the alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting “under color of state law” (identical to “state action”)
- Proper Ds: Individual government employees at any level of government, in their individual capacities, including municipalities and local governments
Timeliness: Ripiness
- P must have experienced a real injury (or imminent threat thereof)
- Action brought too soon is “unripe”
Example: If an ambiguous law has a long history of non-enfrocement, case challenging that law may not be “ripe”
Note: Doctrine of ripeness matters at each stage of review, not just when the complaint is filed.
Timeliness: Mootness
Must be a live controversy at each stage of review. A case is not moot if:
* Controvesy is “capable of repetition” but “evading review”;
* D voluntarily ceases its illegal/wrongful action upon commencement of litigation (unless D could not reasonably resume the action, i.e., by passing a law granting relief)
* Collateral legal consequences can be imposed based on challenged conviction
* Named P’s claim in a class action suit is resolved
Note: Doctrine of mootness matters at each stage of review, not just when the complaint is filed.
Mootness: Capable of Repitition Yet Evading Review
A case will not be dismissed as moot if:
* A person will be subjected to same action over and over again; and
* Action will not last long enough to work its way through the judicial system.
Justiciability: Advisory Opinions
- Advisory opinion states opinion of Supreme Court upon a legal question submitted by a legislature, government official, or another court
- No advisory opinions: An actual case or controversy must exist
Justiciability: Declaratory Judgments
- Declaratory judgments are a binding judgment from a court defining the legal relationship between parties and their rights in a matter before the court
- Not prohibited, but challenged action must pose “real and immediate danger” to a party’s interests
Justiciability: Political Questions
Political questions are not subject to judicial review when:
* (i) Constitution has assigned decision-making on this subject to a different branch of the government, or
* (ii) Matter is inherently not one that the judiciary can decide
Absention
A federal court may abstain from deciding a claim when strong state interests are at stake. There are four kinds of abstention:
* Pullman: Unsettled law
* Younger: Pending criminal case
* Burford: Complex state regulatory scheme
* Colorado River: Simultaneous similar state/federal cases
Commerce Clause: Interstate Commerce
The power to regulate:
(i) the channels of interstate commerce,
(ii) the instrumentalities of interstate commerce, and
(iii) any activity that substantially affects interstate commerce
Note: Congress cannot mandate that individuals not engaged in commercial activities engage in commerce.
Commerce Clause: Substantial Economic Effect
- Economic activity is presumed to have a substantial effect.
- Aggregation: Even if an instrastate activity has no direct economic imapct on interstate commerce, Congress can regulate as long as there is a rational basis for concluding the total incidence of the activity in the aggregate substantially affects interstate commerce
Commerce Clause: Noneconomic Activity
- Noneconomic activity cannot be aggregated
- To regulate intrastate, noneconomic activity that involves area of traditional state concern, noneconomic activity itself must have a substantial impact on interstate commerce