Constitutional Law Flashcards
Justiciability
Whether a case can be decided by a federal court depends on:
1) what case is requesting (no advisory opinions)
2) when is the case brought? (is it ripe or moot)
3) who is bringing the case? (does P have standing)
Advisory opinion
Lacks actual dispute between adverse parties or legally binding effect on the parties
Ripeness and mootness
Ripeness = no pre-enforcement review unless:
1) fit for decision (legal issue not factual)
2) P would suffer substantial hardship without review
Mootness = no live controversy and ongoing injury
Exceptions to mootness
1) capable of repetition but evading review because of short duration
2) D voluntarily stops but is free to resume
3) class actions with one live claim
Standing
1) Injury
2) causation
3) redressability
Injury in fact
1) particularized = injury affects P in a person and individual way
2) concrete = injury actually exists
Citizenship standing
No standing merely as citizen or taxpayer except:
1) challenge individual tax liability
2) congressional spending in violation of the Establishment Clause
Third party standing
No third party standing BUT:
1) A claimant with standing in their own right may assert the right of a third party if:
- it is difficult for the third party to assert their own rights or
- a close relationship between the claimant and the third party
2) An organization has standing to sue on behalf of its members if:
- there is an injury in fact to the members
- the members’ injury is related to the organization’s purpose AND
- individual member participation in the lawsuit is not required
3) Free speech claim on behalf of others whose speech would be protected under 1st Am, alleging that the government restricted substantially more speech than necessary
Causation for standing
Must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of
Redressability for standing
Decision in the litigant’s favor must be capable of eliminating their harm
Congressional conferral of standing
Congress cannot grant standing to someone who doesn’t have an injury, but it can pass a law that creates new interests, the injury of which may be sufficient for standing
Standing to enforce government statutes
P may have standing to enforce a federal law if they are within the zone of interests Congress meant to protect
Test cases
Standing is not defeated just because a P brings a case to test the constitutionality of a law
Sovereign immunity
11th Am = bars a private party’s suit against a state in courts and agencies, unless:
1) express waiver = states consent to be sued
2) implied/structural waiver = yield to certain federal powers
3) local governments can be sued
4) states can sue other states and the federal government can sue states
5) bankruptcy proceedings
6) certain actions against state officers
- personal damages
- enjoin future violative conduct
7) Congress removes the immunity
Political questions
Issues:
1) constitutionally committed to another branch of government or
2) inherently incapable of judicial resolution
Examples:
- challenges to congressional procedures for ratifying constitutional amendments
- President’s conduct on foreign policy
- political gerrymandering
Original jurisdiction of Supreme Court
1) All cases affecting:
- ambassadors
- public ministers
- consuls
2) Cases where a state is a party
Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction
1) All cases in which federal judicial power extends under Article III:
- review of constitutionality of acts of other branches
- review state acts under Supremacy Clause
2) Cases where there has been a final judgment by the lower court
A) writ of certiorari = SCT has complete discretion to hear these cases, which come from:
- cases from the highest state court involving 1) the constitutionality of a statute or 2) a state statute allegedly violating federal law
- all cases from federal courts of appeals
B) appeal = SCT must hear these cases, which are confined to decisions by three-judge federal district court panels that grant or deny injunctions
Adequate and independent state grounds
SCT will not review a state court decision that is based on adequate and independent state law grounds, even if federal issues are involved
Adequate grounds = fully dispositive of the case
Federal legislative power
Congress can exercise powers enumerated in Article I, Section 8 plus any necessary and proper powers to carry out its enumerated powers
No federal police power except
- federal lands
- military bases
- reservations
- D.C.
Necessary and proper clause
Congress can use any rational, constitutional means to exercise an enumerated power, as long as it doesn’t violate another provision of the constitution
Can NOT be used alone –> it must work in conjunction with another federal power
Taxing and spending power
Congress may tax and spend to promote the general welfare
- any public purpose not prohibited by constitution
Spending power conditions
Congress can impose conditions on the grant of money to state or local governments (“strings”)
Conditions are valid if they are:
1) clearly stated
2) related to the purpose of the program
3) not unduly coercive
4) do not otherwise violate the constitution
Most federal taxes will be upheld if…
they bear some reasonable relationship to revenue production or to promoting the general welfare
Commerce power
Congress has power to regulate all commerce with foreign nations, tribes and among the states
Federal law regulating interstate commerce must:
1) regulate the channels of interstate commerce
2) regulate the instrumentalities of interstate commerce and persons and things in interstate commerce or
3) regulate activities that have a substantial effect on interstate commerce
Regulating intrastate activity
Congress can regulate intrastate commercial activity if there is a rational basis for which the activity in the aggregate substantially affects interstate commerce
- Must be commercial
- cannot compel activity
- 10th Am = can’t regulate noneconomic activity traditionally regulated by the states
- e.g., Congress can’t criminalize intrastate domestic violence against women
Power to prohibit private discrimination
Commerce clause gives Congress power to prohibit private discrimination in activities that might have a substantial effect on interstate commerce
- e.g., hotels, restaurants
Public discrimination = congress can directly regulate under 14th Am
Other congressional powers
1) war and related power
2) investigatory power
3) property power = eminent domain
4) postal power = exclusive
5) power over citizenship
6) admiralty power
7) power to coin money and fix standards for weights and measures
8) patent/copyright power
Delegation of legislative power
Congress can delegate rule-making or regulatory power to the executive or judicial branches as long as:
1) intelligible standards are set and
2) power isn’t something uniquely confined to Congress
Major questions doctrine
Regulation by an agency of extraordinary economic and political significance (“major questions”) needs clear congressional authorization
Bicameralism and presentment requirements
Bicameralism = passage of a bill by both houses of Congress
Presentment = presenting bill to president for signature or veto
1) no line-item vetoes
2) no legislative vetoes
Speech or debate clause
Conduct that occurs in the regular course of the federal legislative process and the motivation behind that conduct are immune from prosecution
Implied presidential powers
1) Authorized by Congress = power at its strongest
2) Congress is silent but action is supported by history and necessity = twilight zone
3) Against express will of Congress = action invalid
President’s appointment powers
- ambassadors
- SCT justices
- other officers not provided for in Constitution
Removal powers
By president = high level, purely executive officers at will without any interference by Congress
By Congress = executive officers ONLY through the impeachment process
Veto power
President can veto
Congress can override veto by a 2/3 vote of each house
Pocket veto
1) 10 days to exercise veto power
2) if no action and Congress is not in session = bill automatically vetoed
3) if no action and Congress is in session = bill becomes law
Power over external affairs
No power to declare war, but can act militarily in actual hostilities against U.S. as commander in chief without congress declaring war
Treaty power
1) negotiated by President
2) approved by 2/3 vote in Senate
Treaties and conflicts of law
1) Constitution
2) Federal law, including treaties
3) If a treaty and federal law conflict, last in time prevails
4) Executive agreements
5) State law
Executive agreements
- Signed by President and the head of a foreign country
- used for any purpose a treaty is used for
- no Senate approval required
Executive privilege
President has privilege to keep certain presidential communications secret, especially national security secrets
Exception = criminal proceedings
Executive immunity
Absolute immunity from civil damages based on any action taken within scope of office
Impeachment
President, VP and all civil officers are subject to impeachment
1) Bringing impeachment charges = majority vote in House
2) conviction and removal from office = 2/3 vote in Senate
President’s pardon power
President has unqualified power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.
10th Amendment
Powers not granted to the federal government are reserved to states or people
States have general police powers = they can regulate the health, safety and welfare of their people
- upheld if they have a rational basis and legitimate purpose
Exclusive federal powers
- some enumerated powers are exclusively federal because the Constitution limits or prohibits the use of the power by states
- other enumerated powers are exclusively federal because the nature of the power itself can only be exercised by feds
Anti-commandeering principle
- Congress cannot require states to enact state laws or enforce federal laws
- Congress cannot pass a tax that applies only to the state governments
- Regulation of both private people and the states = valid
Intergovernmental immunity doctrine
States cannot interfere with or control the operations of the federal government
- A state’s nondiscriminatory, indirect taxing of the federal government is permissible if it doesn’t unreasonably burden the federal government
Express preemption
Federal law expressly says that states may not adopt laws concerning the subject matter of the federal legislation
- express preemption clauses are narrowly construed
Implied preemption
1) conflict preemption = impossible to follow both federal and state law
2) frustration preemption = state law frustrates or impedes the achievement of a federal objective
3) field preemption = federal law occupies the entire field, barring any state or local law, even if the state law is nonconflicting
- look to regulatory scheme to determine if Congress intended to preempt the entire field
Presumption against preemption
Court start with the presumption that historic state police powers are not to be preempted unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress
Interstate compact clause
Agreements between states
- if agreement increases states’ power at the expense of federal power, congressional approval is required
Privileges and immunities
Prohibits states from discriminating against out of state citizens concerning:
1) important commercial activities and
2) fundamental rights
Privileges and immunities clause only applies when
discrimination by a state against nonresidents is intentionally protectionist in nature
State laws can only discriminate against nonresidents with regard to an important commercial activity or fundamental right if…
the law is necessary to achieve an important government purpose and there are no less restrictive alternatives
- must show that nonresidents either cause or are part of the problem the state is trying to resolve and this law is the only way to solve it
14th Amendment privileges of national citizenship
States cannot deny citizens the privileges or immunities of national citizenship, including:
- right to travel = law that distinguishes between new residents based solely on the length of their residency serves no legitimate state interest
Dormant commerce clause
States can enact laws regulating local aspects of interstate commerce IF:
1) Congress has not enacted laws on the subject AND
2) the state does not discriminate against or unduly burden interstate commerce
State laws that discriminate against interstate commerce
Almost always invalid if they discriminate to protect local economic interests, unless:
1) necessary to achieve an important noneconomic state interest and
2) no reasonable nondiscriminatory alternatives available
Nondiscriminatory state laws
A law that treats local and out of states interests alike is presumptively valid UNLESS:
- the burden outweighs the promotion of a legitimate local interest (the benefit)
Exceptions to the Dormant Commerce Clause
1) congressional approval
2) state as a market participant
3) favoring government performing traditional government functions
State’s durational residency requirement (waiting period) for dispensing benefits
Subject to the strict scrutiny test
- usually found not to satisfy test
- interest in fiscal integrity is NOT sufficient to justify a one-year waiting period of welfare or health benefits
Power of states to tax interstate commerce
Discriminatory taxes = state taxes that discriminate against interstate commerce violate the Commerce Clause
- may also violate Privileges and Immunities Clause or EPC
Nondiscriminatory taxes = valid IF:
1) substantial nexus between activity and the state
2) fair apportionment
3) fair relationship to services or benefits provided by the state
Exceptions to incorporation of Bill of Rights
1) 5th Am’s prohibition of criminal trials without a grand jury indictment
2) 7th Am’s right to jury trial in civil cases
State action can be found in seemingly private individuals who:
1) perform exclusive public functions = activities traditionally and exclusively performed by government or
2) have significant state involvement = state affirmatively facilitates, encourages or authorizes acts of discrimination in private conduct
Rational basis review
Applies to regulations that do not affect fundamental rights or involve suspect or quasi-suspect classifications
Law is upheld if it is rationally related to a legitimate government purposes
- usually valid unless arbitrary or irrational
- BOP = person challenging the law