Agency, Partnerships, Corporations Flashcards
Agency
Fiduciary relationship that arises when one person (principal) appoints the other person (agent) to act on principal’s behalf and subject to his control with consent from both parties
Capacity
Principal must have contractual capacity, but agent does not
Formalities for creation of agency
1) consent of both parties
2) in writing, if the agent is to enter into Ks within SOFs
3) no consideration required
Agent’s duties to principal
Agent = fiduciary owing:
1) duty of care
- must carry out agency with reasonable care
2) duty of loyalty
- undivided loyalty to principal
- nothing remotely “unfair” to P
3) duty of obedience
- must obey all reasonable directions of P
- aspect of duty of loyalty, but separate obligation
Principal’s duties to agents
- not fiduciary in nature, but still owe obligations
1) all duties imposed in K
2) reasonable compensation
3) reimbursement for expenses
4) not unreasonably interfere with A’s performance
Main questions for agency law
1) Does the A entering into K bind the P?
2) Is a P liable for torts committed by the agent?
Actual authority
Authority A reasonably believes they possess based on P’s dealings with them
- express = actually in agency agreement
- implied = agent reasonably believes they have authority, inferred from P’s actions, acquiescence or customs
Irrevocable agencies
1) Either:
- agency coupled with an interest
- agency power given as security
2) to protect agent’s rights AND
3) supported by consideration
= irrevocable
Termination of actual authority
A must have authority at the moment of entering into the K
Termination or revocation occurs by:
1) specified time
2) specified event
3) reasonable time
4) change of circumstances
5) breach of fiduciary duty
6) unilateral act by either party
7) death of either party
Apparent authority
Based on third party’s reasonable belief that A is acting on P’s behalf
- protects innocent third parties who rely on P’s hold out of a person as their agent
Types of apparent authority
1) A exceeds actual authority but P is still bound
- prior act permitting A to exceed
- power of position = based on agent’s title or position
2) A has no actual authority
- unilateral agent representations
- imposters (P negligent)
- lingering apparent authority = after actual authority ends
3) inherent authority
- respondeat superior
- conduct similar to that authorized
Ratification (authority after the fact)
Agency created when A purports to act on behalf of P without any authority but P subsequently validates the act and becomes bound
- Express = oral or written affirmation of K
- Implied = P accepts benefits of the K
Requirements for ratification
P must:
1) have knowledge of all material facts
2) accept entire transaction AND
3) have capacity to K
Who is bound by the K?
1) actual, apparent, ratification = P bound and agent not liable
2) undisclosed or partially disclosed P = P and A bound
- third party has no knowledge A is acting on behalf of P
3) third party liable only to P when P was disclosed
- third party liable to either P or A when P undisclosed
P may be vicariously liable for torts of A under two theories:
1) respondeat superior
2) apparent authority
P’s direct liability
1) for P’s own negligence in retaining agent
2) for an A’s tort if they gave A actual authority to commit tort
Respondeat superior (employer-employee)
P (employer) is liable for torts of an A (employee) if the tort was committed within the scope of employment
Independent contractor
P is NOT liable for the torts of an independent contractor
Employee vs independent contractor
Employee = P retains right to control manner in which A performs work
- Control over HOW a task should be done
IC = P does not retain right to control manner in which IC performs work
- Control over ONLY that the task should be done
Uncertainty whether an employee or IC
Overriding question = right to control and manner/method by which agent conducts tasks:
- degree of skill required
- whose tools and facilities are used
- period of employment
- basis of compensation
- business purposes
- whether person has distinct business
- characterization and understanding of parties
- customs of locality regarding supervision of work
Scope of employment
1) conduct was of the kind A was hired to perform
2) tort was performed “on the job”
- detour vs frolic
3) conduct was done at least in part to benefit principal
Frolic and detour
Frolic = substantial deviation from employer’s direction
Detour = minor deviation from employer’s directions
Intentional tort liability of employers
General rule = Employer not liable for employee’s intentional torts (not normally within scope of employment)
- exception = conduct natural from nature of job (e.g., bouncers)
Liability for acts of borrowed employees
Borrowed = employee of one employer doing service for another
Liability = who has the primary right of control over the employee
Liability for acts of independent contractors
P will be liable for acts of IC where:
1) inherently dangerous activities are involved
2) nondelegable duties have been delegated or
3) principal knowingly selected an incompetent IC
- if merely negligent, P is liable for their own negligence, but not IC’s
Analysis of P’s liability to a third party on a K entered into by A
Did agent have actual or apparent authority at time or K, or did principal ratify K later?
- If yes, P is liable (A usually is not)
Analysis of P’s liability for a tort committed by A
Was the tort committed by an employee in the scope of employment?
- If yes, P and A are jointly and severally liable to third party
Partnership
2 or more persons associate to carry on as co-owners a business for profit
- no formalities or state filings
- regardless of subjective intent –> only matters that they intended to carry on as co-owners a business for profit
Partnership formation factors
1) sharing profits raises presumption of partnership
2) right to participate in control of business
3) loss sharing = something owners typically bear
Evidence of partnership
Evidence but no presumption raised:
1) joint tenancy or tenancy in common
2) parties designate as partnership
3) venture requires extensive activity
4) sharing of gross returns
Partnership by estoppel
No partnership in fact, but parties are treated like partners to protect reasonable reliance by third parties
Partnership agreement
No agreement required to form partnership
- if no agreement, fall back on statutory default rules
Entity status of partnership
Legal entity distinct from its partners
Additional formation requirements
1) capacity
2) legal purpose
3) consent of all partners
4) statement of partnership authority (optional)
Default rules for voting in partnerships
1) one partner, one vote
2) ordinary business decision = majority vote by number
3) extraordinary business decision = unanimous vote
Default rules for rights of partners
Management = equal right to participate
Distributions = profits and losses shared equally
Salary/compensation = no right except for winding up business
Indemnification = Right to be indemnified by other partners for expenses incurred
Contribution = right to contribution from other partners if more than fair share of liability paid
Inspection = right to inspect and copy books
Lawsuits = may sue or be sued by partnership
Profit/loss sharing default rules
1) Profits shared equally among partners by number
2) losses shared in same manner as profits
Liability to third parties in partnerships
Each partner acts as an agent of the partnership for purposes of business
- authority = agency law
Actual authority in partnerships
statement of partnership authority = document filed publicly granting or limiting partner’s authority to enter into transactions on behalf of partnership
- gives constructive notice of partner’s authority to transact = binds third parties
- can cut off apparent authority for land transactions ONLY
Apparent authority in partnerships
Partner is an agent and has apparent authority to bind the partnership in transactions within ordinary course of partnership’s business
- must be business of the kind by partnership
- limited by third party’s actual or notice knowledge of partner’s authority
- NOT waivable
Liability of partners
Each partner is jointly and severally liable for all obligations of partnership in tort and contract
Plaintiff must exhaust all partnership resources before seeking to collect from individual partners
Admitting new partners (and liability of admitted partners)
Requires unanimous vote
Liability = not personally liable for obligations arising before their admission
Liabilities of dissociating partners
Outgoing partner remains liable for obligations arising while they were a partner unless there has been payment, release or novation
Criminal liability of partners
Partners are not criminally liable for crimes of other partners committed within scope of business, unless they participated in some way
Fiduciary duties owed by partners
Partners owe four duties to the partnership and each other:
1) duty of loyalty
2) duty of care
Duty of loyalty
acting with other partners’ and partnership’s interest first and with utmost fairness
- account to partnership for any benefit taken
- no taking adverse positions to partnership
- no competing with partnership
Duty of care
- no grossly negligent or reckless conduct
- regular negligence excused
Duty of disclosure
Statutory duty to provide information without demand and on demand
Duty of obedience
Requires partner to obey all reasonable directions of partnership and not act outside of scope of authority
Elimination of duties in partnership agreement
Duties of loyalty and care are fiduciary and can NOT be eliminated
Duty of disclosure is statutory and may be eliminated
Partnership capital and partnership property
Capital = property or money contributed by each partner for purpose of carrying on business
Property = everything the partnership owns, both capital and subsequently acquired in transactions
Determining partnership property
Partnership property is property:
1) acquired in partnership’s name
2) acquired in partner’s name who was acting for partnership
3) purchased with partnership funds (rebuttable presumption)
Determining partner’s separate property
Property is rebuttably presumed to be partner’s if:
1) it’s held in the name of one or more partners
2) instrument transferring title gives no sign that they’re acting for a partnership
3) partnership funds were not used to acquire it
Partnership’s rights in partnership property
Rights are totally unrestricted = partnership owns it
Partner’s rights in partnership property
- partner is NOT a co-owner of P-ship property
- no interest to transfer
- can use it for P-ship purposes
Partner’s ownership interest in P-ship
P-ship interest = personal property of partner, but there are restrictions:
1) management rights = right to participate in business’s management
- NO unilateral transfer of these rights
- requires unanimous vote of existing partners
2) financial rights = rights to receive profits
- unilateral transfer of these rights is allowed –> transferee gets profits that would have gone to partner
- transferee is NOT the partner
Dissociation
Partner’s withdrawal from partnership - occurs by:
1) oral or written notice of P’s express will to withdraw (voluntary)
2) happening of an agreed event
3) valid expulsion of P
4) P’s bankruptcy or appointment of receiver
5) P’s death or incapacity
6) decision of court that P is incapable of performing duties
7) termination of business entity that is a P
Notice of P’s express will to withdraw from a P-ship at will
automatically triggers dissolution of the p-ship
At will partnership
no agreement to remain partners and no definitive end point or specific undertaking
- default form of p-ship
Term partnership
agreement to remain partners for amount of time or until completion of project
Consequences of dissociation for P-ship
1) P-ship is dissolved and business must be wound up
- business is liquidated (sold off)
2) P-ship continues to exist and other Ps buy out the dissociating P
Dissolution when P dissociates
Required when:
1) P dissociates by express will in an at-will P-ship
2) in term P-ship, one P wrongfully dissociates or dissociation occurs because of P’s death or bankruptcy
Buyout
Dissociation of one P does not result in dissolution –> P is entitled to buyout of his P-ship interest by other Ps
Liability of dissociated partner
Pre-dissociation = remains liable for these obligations
Post-dissociation = may be liable for obligations incurred within 2 years after dissociation if:
1) other party reasonably believed dissociated partner was still a P and
2) other party had no notice of dissociation
- apparent authority continues for 2 years if no notice!
Dissociated P can cut off liability by
1) notifying creditors directly of dissociation OR
2) filing a public notice of dissociation which becomes effective 90 days after filing
Dissolution of partnership
Selling off assets and paying off P-ship liabilities and debts
- not enough assets to cover debts = Ps must contribute according to their loss shares
- surplus assets = distributed to Ps according to profit shares
Events causing dissolution
1) dissociation by express will of P in P-ship at will
2) expiration of definite term or undertaking
3) happening of agreed upon event in p-ship agreement
4) illegality
5) issuance of judicial decree
6) passage of 90 consecutive days without at least 2 partners
Distribution of p-ship assets
1) creditors, including Ps who loaned money to firm
2) reimburse Ps for capital contributions
3) Ps based on profit sharing (or loss if there is a deficit)
Ps right to wind up
All living Ps have a right to participate in winding up except those that wrongfully dissolved or are bankrupt
Limited partnerships
Partnership with at least one general partner and at least one limited partner
- distinct entity and perpetual duration unless otherwise provided
Formation of LP
1) certificate of LP filed with Sec of State, including names and addresses of partners/p-ship
2) must maintain records office
3) must have registered agent = person designated to receive official mail from the state or to receive service of process
4) name must contain the phrase “LP”
LP agreement
Contains detail on the operation and governance of LP
- may be written, oral or implied
- can displace most statutory provisions