Agency, Partnerships, Corporations Flashcards
Agency
Fiduciary relationship that arises when one person (principal) appoints the other person (agent) to act on principal’s behalf and subject to his control with consent from both parties
Capacity
Principal must have contractual capacity, but agent does not
Formalities for creation of agency
1) consent of both parties
2) in writing, if the agent is to enter into Ks within SOFs
3) no consideration required
Agent’s duties to principal
Agent = fiduciary owing:
1) duty of care
- must carry out agency with reasonable care
2) duty of loyalty
- undivided loyalty to principal
- nothing remotely “unfair” to P
3) duty of obedience
- must obey all reasonable directions of P
- aspect of duty of loyalty, but separate obligation
Principal’s duties to agents
- not fiduciary in nature, but still owe obligations
1) all duties imposed in K
2) reasonable compensation
3) reimbursement for expenses
4) not unreasonably interfere with A’s performance
Main questions for agency law
1) Does the A entering into K bind the P?
2) Is a P liable for torts committed by the agent?
Actual authority
Authority A reasonably believes they possess based on P’s dealings with them
- express = actually in agency agreement
- implied = agent reasonably believes they have authority, inferred from P’s actions, acquiescence or customs
Irrevocable agencies
1) Either:
- agency coupled with an interest
- agency power given as security
2) to protect agent’s rights AND
3) supported by consideration
= irrevocable
Termination of actual authority
A must have authority at the moment of entering into the K
Termination or revocation occurs by:
1) specified time
2) specified event
3) reasonable time
4) change of circumstances
5) breach of fiduciary duty
6) unilateral act by either party
7) death of either party
Apparent authority
Based on third party’s reasonable belief that A is acting on P’s behalf
- protects innocent third parties who rely on P’s hold out of a person as their agent
Types of apparent authority
1) A exceeds actual authority but P is still bound
- prior act permitting A to exceed
- power of position = based on agent’s title or position
2) A has no actual authority
- unilateral agent representations
- imposters (P negligent)
- lingering apparent authority = after actual authority ends
3) inherent authority
- respondeat superior
- conduct similar to that authorized
Ratification (authority after the fact)
Agency created when A purports to act on behalf of P without any authority but P subsequently validates the act and becomes bound
- Express = oral or written affirmation of K
- Implied = P accepts benefits of the K
Requirements for ratification
P must:
1) have knowledge of all material facts
2) accept entire transaction AND
3) have capacity to K
Who is bound by the K?
1) actual, apparent, ratification = P bound and agent not liable
2) undisclosed or partially disclosed P = P and A bound
- third party has no knowledge A is acting on behalf of P
3) third party liable only to P when P was disclosed
- third party liable to either P or A when P undisclosed
P may be vicariously liable for torts of A under two theories:
1) respondeat superior
2) apparent authority
P’s direct liability
1) for P’s own negligence in retaining agent
2) for an A’s tort if they gave A actual authority to commit tort
Respondeat superior (employer-employee)
P (employer) is liable for torts of an A (employee) if the tort was committed within the scope of employment
Independent contractor
P is NOT liable for the torts of an independent contractor
Employee vs independent contractor
Employee = P retains right to control manner in which A performs work
- Control over HOW a task should be done
IC = P does not retain right to control manner in which IC performs work
- Control over ONLY that the task should be done
Uncertainty whether an employee or IC
Overriding question = right to control and manner/method by which agent conducts tasks:
- degree of skill required
- whose tools and facilities are used
- period of employment
- basis of compensation
- business purposes
- whether person has distinct business
- characterization and understanding of parties
- customs of locality regarding supervision of work
Scope of employment
1) conduct was of the kind A was hired to perform
2) tort was performed “on the job”
- detour vs frolic
3) conduct was done at least in part to benefit principal
Frolic and detour
Frolic = substantial deviation from employer’s direction
Detour = minor deviation from employer’s directions
Intentional tort liability of employers
General rule = Employer not liable for employee’s intentional torts (not normally within scope of employment)
- exception = conduct natural from nature of job (e.g., bouncers)
Liability for acts of borrowed employees
Borrowed = employee of one employer doing service for another
Liability = who has the primary right of control over the employee