Constitution - Saunders Flashcards
Article 1
All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the us which will consist of a senate and a house of representatives
Article 2
The executive power shall be vested in a president of USA
Article 3
The judicial power of the USA shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts as congress may from time to time ordain or establishment
Article IV
Federal state and federal relationship
Amending the constitution- its provisions are entrenched
(Protection against enemy attack)
Political provisions are protected from enemy attack (those who wish to change/abolish)
In the US constitution entrenchment is provided through complex amendment process
Amending the constitution - codified constitution
Written constitution
Systematic and authoritative set of rules
Articles that outline what each branch of govt can/cant do
Amending the constitution - a blend of specificity and vagueness
Some powers are vague and open to interpretation
Necessary and proper clause - the federal govt can do what is necessary and proper
Route 1 of the amendment process
By a 2/3 majority in both the senate and the house
Then 3/4 of state legislatures must ratify it
Route 2 of amendment process
At a constitutional convention called by 2/3 of states
Then 3/4 of state legislatures must ratify it at a special state ratifying convention
Arguments for the constitution being too hard to amend formally
- although in theory states can initiate the formal amendment process under article V, not national constitutional conventions ever been held
- too much informal amendment takes place Supreme Court judgments from individuals who are unelected + unaccountable
- very few amendments have been passed recently due to the high thresholds required - 27 in over 200 years
-the current constitution contains some provisions that may be considered outdated e.g. electoral college or 2nd amendment - it prevents the constitution from being updated especially in the area of rights- while some key groups are protected e.g racial minorities others e.g women are not - the complexities of passing amendments make this almost impossible to achieve
Arguments against the constitution being to hard to amend formally
-opinion when reaching its conclusions - so internally amending the constitution e,g LGBTQ rights
-the current amendment process in theory allows for federal dimension to be present via a national constitutional convention
-the high threshold for formality ensure that changes only happen when there is wide consensus and broad agreement
-obsolete clauses of the constitution can be repeated as happened with probation - some constitutional problems such as the electoral college could be reformed without need for outright abolition - some aspects of the 2nd amendment are capable of a sensible adjustment e.g banning sale of certain weapons or receiving background checks
-supreme court does often take note of the direction of public
The bill of rights
1- freedom of speech, religion, press assembly and petition
2- right to bear arms
3- quartering of soldiers
4- arrest and searches
5- rights of persons accused of crimes
6- rights of person on trial for crime
7- jury trial in civil cases
8- limits on bail and punishment
9- rights kept by the people
10- powers kept by the state of the people
Separation of powers
This is where political power is distributed among 3 branches of govt.
-legislature
-executive
-judiciary
Acting both independently and interdependently
- was put into the place by the founding fathers because of their fear of tyranny
- decided that they needed to be independent yet equal so they could check the powers of each others
- no person could be in more than 1 branch of govt e.g Obama and Biden
Neustadt says the term s/p is misleading for it is the institutions that are separate, not the powers
Executive checks on legislative branch
-can veto bills
-can issue executive orders to reduce needs for getting laws passed by congress
-as commander in chief can initiate military action without congressional approval
Executive checks on judicial branch
-Appoints all Supreme Court and federal justices
-issues pardons and communications
Judicial branch on executive branch
-can declare presidential acts unconstitutional
-justices serve for life and can’t be replaced
Judicial checks on legislative branch
-can rule acts of congress unconstitutional
-justices are permanent and can’t be removed by congressional votes
Legislative checks on executive branch
-can override veto
-senate must confirm most executive appointments
-senate must approve foreign treaties
-controls money
-power to declare war
Legislative checks on judicial branch
-impeachment
-can pass new laws to get around some court rulings
-can increase size of Supreme Court
Presidential checks on the court
President nominates all federal justices
- Obama appointed elana kagon
President can issue pardons to those convicted of federal crimes
-ford pardoned his predecessor Nixon