Conformity & Norms Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the two types of conformity?

A

Normative Social Influence (NSI), Informational Social Influence (ISI)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the key motivation, thought/behaviour profile, and key study demonstrating support for NSI

A

Conforming in order to be liked and accepted by others, public compliance (doing what others do) NOT private acceptance (genuine belief that thoughts, beliefs or actions are correct), Asch Line study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Asch Line Study (methods)

A

7 confederates and 1 real participant, participant told study on perceptual judgement. Asked if comparison line matches standard line. Answers told out loud. Clear correct answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Asch Line Study (results)

A

Confederates gave clear wrong answer and participants conformed. 76% conformed at least once. Unlikely & alone, 99% accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Asch Line Study (reason)

A

People didn’t want to disagree but risked isolation & embarrassment. Displaying public compliance but not private acceptance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the key motivation, thought/behaviour profile, and key study demonstrating support for ISI

A

Follow other’s to gain information, more important outcome more we follow others, (private acceptance) 1930’s ISI study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

1930’s ISI Study (methods)

A

Participants sit alone, dark room with white dot on wall (not moving but appears to be). Invited back but in group and agree on estimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

1930’s ISI Study (results)

A

alone their paths were different, but when together their estimates converged came back at later date and had similar answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

1930’s ISI Study (reason)

A

Both public compliance and private acceptance. Used each others information to come to a conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Social Impact Theory? What does it suggest? (3 things)

A

Strength (how important the group is to you), Immediacy (proximity in time and space), Number of people (the size of the group)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two types of norms? (name & describe)

A

Injunctive (rules about how people are supposed to behave), Descriptive (how people actually behave)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can someone overcome NSI?

A
  1. Be aware
  2. Find an ally (or group) to resist with you
  3. cash in your idiosyncrasy credits (credits earned from conforming to group norms before)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe the Door-In-The-Face Technique

A

request something big (expecting refusal) then present small, reasonable request.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe the Door-In-The-Face Technique (experimental evidence)

A

chaperone 2 hour trip (17% agree), 2yr unpaid volunteer, reject, chaperone 2 hour trip (51% agree)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the Foot-In-The-Door Technique

A

Presenting small request first, most agree, then ask for larger request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the Foot-In-The-Door Technique (experimental evidence)

A

large request only (drive safely sign), small request -> large (petition to support safe driving, 2 weeks later, drive safely sign)

17
Q

Which lasts longer? (Door-In-The-Face or Foot-In-The-Door) Why?

A

Foot-In-The-Door Technique. Changes self-perception where Door-In-The-Face fulfills reciprocity norm, no drive or reason to help in future

18
Q

Describe the design and findings of Milgram’s obedience study?

A

Design: Participant “teacher”, confederate “learner”, told to shock learner every time he gets wrong answer (shock increases with each wrong answer), learner complains of heart trouble demands release.
Findings: 80% continue after learner screams, 62.5% delivered maximum shock