Conformity Flashcards
Who identified the 3 types of conformity
Herbert Kelman (1985)
What are the 3 types of conformity
Compliance
Identification
Compliance
Majority influence
- when a large group of people changes the beliefs, behaviours and attitudes of a smaller group
- linked to compliance
Minority influence
- when a smaller group of people changes the behaviours, beliefs and attitudes of a larger group
- linked to internalisation
Who proposed the two process theory
Deutsch and Gerard (1955)
Two process theory
Informational social influence
Normative social influence
Informational social influence
- The need to be right
- conform because they want to be right/gain knowledge
- go along with majority as you genuinely believe they are correct (internalisation)
- cognitive process
Normative social influence
- The need to be liked
- want to be accepted by others and not rejected
- the desire to fit in motivates the individual to conform to the beliefs and opinions of a group so they don’t stand out
Compliance
- weakest type of conformity
- person publicly changes their behaviour and beliefs to fit that of a group
- however, privately does not accept the behaviours and beliefs of the group, they just comply with them
Identification
- stronger type of conformity than compliance because it involves the person both publicly and privately changing their behaviour and beliefs to fit that of a group they want to be part of
- however, only identifies with these beliefs as long as they are associated with the group
- when they leave the group they return to their original beliefs
Internalisation
- strongest type
- person both publicly and privately changes their behaviour and beliefs to a group, but permanently
- maintain the beliefs even after leaving the social group
Research Support ISI
Lucas et al (2006)
- gave students maths problems
- the more difficult the questions the higher the conformity rate
-> especially those who had rated their maths skills as “poor”
- supports that being an expert is a fundamental component of an ISI explanation
Strength of NSI
- Asch
- only 1 not confederate
- pts conformed, and said the wrong answer on purpose because they felt self-conscious
- when the answers had to be written down conformity dropped by 12.5%
- supports the need of acceptance
Limitation of NSI + ISI
- approach states that behaviour is either due to NSI or ISI
- conformity was reduced when there was a dissenting partner in Asch’s experiment
- the dissenter may reduce the power of NSI, or reduce the power of ISI
- isn’t always possible to know which one is the most prominent
- questions the view of them operating independently in conforming behaviour
- oversimplifies the theory
Limitation of NSI + ISI
- they adopt a nomothetic approach, make general principles relating to human behaviour
- however, some people may react differently and not care about conformity or what other people think
- can’t necessarily be applied to everyone