conflicts of interest Flashcards
Types of conflicts
a. Concurrent Client (different clients) Conflicts
b. Former Clients Conflicts
c. Prospective Client Conflicts
. Client Conflicts
3rd Person Conflicts
Concurrent conflict of interest
i. MR 1.7 (a)
A Lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent (present) conflict of interest
Directly adverse
ii. MR 1.7 a 1 (Directly Adverse)
A concurrent conflict of interest exists if the representation of one client will be directly adverse to another client
materially limited
iii. MR 1.7 a 2 (Materially Limited)
1) A concurrent conflict of interest exists if there is a significant risk that representation of one client will be materially limited by duties to another client
iv. MR 1.7 a 2 comment 1) Is there a significant risk of the lawyers ability to recommend a course of action for one client will be materially limited because of his obligation to another.
exceptions to concurrent interests
v. MR 1.7 B A lawyer may represent a client if the lawyer (Exceptions)
1) Reasonably believes he/she can provide competent and diligent representation to each affected client;
2) Representation is not prohibited by law;
3) Representation does not involve a claim by one client against another client in the same litigation; and
Each client gives informed consent confirmed in writing
Business transactions rule
ii. May a lawyer represent separate individuals seeking to form a partnership?
Yes, but there is a potential for malpractice/disciple inf the individuals come into conflict and the lawyers representation is materially limited.
Necessary disclosures rule
i. A duty of informed consent exists for these conflicts. The lawyer must inform the clients of all risks and the benefits of joint representation.
ii. 1.7 Comment 29
1) If joint representation fails, each client might suffer additional costs, and embarrassment and recrimination
iii. 1.7 Comment 31
1) Potential waiver of AC privilege because you have an equal duty to all clients. Tell the clients all information will be shared. If one client wants to keep something confidential, they must get separate counsel.
iv. Bargaining power
1) If bargaining power is unequal between the parties, the lawyer should decline representation.
v. Individual Representation
If one client expects special help, joint representation impossible, because you cannot advocate anyone clients position against the other.
Economically adverse Conflict Rules
Simultaneous representation of clients in unrelated matters whose interests are only economically adverse does not constitute a conflict of interest and many not require consent of all clients.
Positional Rules Conflict
1) MR 1.7 Comment 24
a) A lawyer may take inconsistent legal positions in different courts at different times on behalf of different clients
A conflict exists however if there is a significant risk that the lawyers action on behalf of the client will materially limit the lawyers effectiveness in representing the other client.
3) Restatement SS 132 Comment C A current conflict may not be transformed into a former conflict by a Lawyers withdrawal from representing the client.
positional hot potato doctrine
A lawyer may not drop a client to keep a more lucrative client. And may not represent either party. The firm may not drop a client like a hot potato.
Former Client Conflicts
i. MR 1.9 (a)
1) A Lawyer who has formerly represented a client shall not represent another client in the same or substantially related matter, or if their interests are materially adverse
2) Exception: unless client gives informed consent in writing.
3) Comment 3:
Two matters are substantially related if they are (1) the same transaction or dispute, or (2) there is a substantial risk that the confidential information of one client would materially advance the second clients position against them.
substantially related matters
ii. MR 1.9(b)
1) A lawyer shall not represent a second client In the same or substantially related matter in which the firm the lawyer worked for represented the other client and the lawyer acquired confidential information about the case while at the firm.
Exception: except where the client gives informed consent in writing.
Substantially related matter shield
iii. MR 1.9(b) Comment 5
1) If the lawyer acquired no knowledge relating to the other client while at the firm, neither the Lawyer nor their firm is disqualified from representing another client in the same or related matter, even if they are materially adverse.
A conflict only exists when the lawyer has actual knowledge of confidential information. Burden of proof rests with the firm whose disqualification is sought.
Conflicts with former clients
A judge has a duty to investigate conflict if he knows or should reasonably know that a conflict exists. However if the judge fails to inquire, automatic reversal is not required but must determine whether the Lawyer had an actual conflict that actually affected the lawyers representation of the defendant. If an actual conflic adversely affects the lawyers performance, then prejudice is presumed.
Imputed Conflicts
i. Screening: baring an attorney from being apart of a case at a firm due to a conflict.
MR 1.10 (a) While associated in a firm, no lawyers shall knowingly represent a client when any one of them would be prohibited from doing so.