Conflict of Laws Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Recognition of judgments

A

A judgment has been entered by a court in one jurisdiction

A party is seeking to have that judgment recognized by a court in a different jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rendering jurisdiction

A

the place where the judgment was originally entered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

recognizing jurisidiction

A

the place where recognition is being sought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sister state

A

Are the requirements of full faith and credit satisfied

are there any valid defenses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Foreign country

A

is the foreign judgment entitled to comity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Are the requirements for full faith and credit satisfied

A

Jurisdiction
- rendering j must have pj and smj
- exception - when issue of jurisdiction has been fully and fairly litigated

on the merits
- default judgment is on the merits

finality
- must be a final judgment, no appeal
- modifiable - final as to past, not final as to future

the requirements evaluated using aw of rendering state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Are there any defenses to full faith and credit

A

Penal judgments
- one that punishes an offense against the public
- P is the state
- exception - tax judgment
- punitives are not penal if the state is not P

extrinsic fraud
- fraud that could not be corrected during the regular course of proceedings leading to the judgment
- example - judge taking a bribe, but not perjury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Not defenses to full faith and credit

A

Public policy

mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Comity

A

A recognizing court will exercise discretion to decide whether the foreign judgment should be recognized

did the foreign court have jurisdiction
- court has greater leeway to assess

was it final

was it on the merits

were the procedures fair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Choice of law

A

Lawsuit involved factual connections with multiple states

the states have different laws leading to different results

what law will govern

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What law governs

A

generally
- law selected by the forum court according to choice of law approach

Federal diversity
- choice of law approach of the state the court sits

transferred diversity
- property- choice of law of original court
- improper of in defiance of forum selection clause - choice of law of transferee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Restrictions of CoL

A

Constitutional
- limit if state law chosen has not significant contract with and/or a legitimate interest in the litigation

Statutory
- if forum state has a statute that directs choice of law - apply statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Approaches for CoL

A

Vested rights of first restatement

interest analysis

most signification relationship of second restatement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

CoL stock paragraph 1

A

The issue presented is which state’s law will govern the outcome of this litigation. The governing law will be selected by the forum court using ___ approach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Vested rights approach stock paragraphs

A
  1. Under this approach, the court will apply the law of that state mandated by the applicable vesting rule. That rule is selected according to the relevant substantive area of law.
  2. This is a ___ (substantive area of law) case. Therefore, the applicable vesting rule is ____. Apply governing law and facts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Interest analysis stock paragraph

Not affected by substantive law - approach is the same

A
  1. Under this approach the court will consider which states have a legitimate interest in the outcome of the litigation. the forum court will apply its own law as long as it has a legitimate interest. If the forum state has no legitimate interest, it will apply the law of another interested state.
  2. Discuss which stated have legitimate interests. Characterized type of conflict. Choose governing law based on type of conflict. Apply law for result.

False conflict - only one state has a legitimate interest - apply law of interested state

true conflict - two or more states have a legitimate interest - if forum state is one of them, apply forum state law

17
Q

Most significant relationship approach stock paragraphs

A
  1. under this approach the court will apply the law of the state which is most significantly related to the outcome of the litigation. To determine this, the court will consider connecting facts and policy principles. (where and why)
  2. Discuss connecting facts, discuss policy principles. Choose governing law and apply.
18
Q

Torts approachs

A

Vesting rule
- the law where the injury occurred

Most significant relationship -

factual connection
- place of injury
- place of conduct causing the injury
- place where parties at home
- place where the relationship is centered

Policy principles
- policies of forum state
- policies of other connected states

General rule
- governing law is usually where injury occurred
- exception - the rules at issue is loss distribution and the parties share a common domicile - then law of domicile

19
Q

Contracts approaches

A

Choice of law provision
- enforceable if valid and express
- invalid if no reasonable relationship to contract, or provisions was included without true mutual consent

Vesting
- if case is about formation - place of contracting/execution
- if case is about performance - place of performance

Most significant
factual
- place of contracting
- place of negotiation
- place of performance
- place where parties are at home

Policy
- policy of forum
- policy of connected states
- reasonable expectations of the parties

20
Q

Property approaches

A

Real property
- law of situs

Personal property
- inter vivos transfer - situs at time of transaction
- inheritance - decedent’s domicile at date of death

21
Q

Family law approaches

A

Marriage
- if marriage is valid where performed - valid everywhere
- exception - temporary relocation for marriage that violates strong public policy in home state

Divorce
- forum applies own divorce laws

Chil status
- legitimacy governed by law of mother’s domicile at time of child’s birth
- validity of subsequent acts of legitimation of paternity are governed by law of father’s domicile

22
Q

Defenses to choice of law

A

Public policy

procedural rules
- will always apply its own procedural rules
- SOL is procedural - different from erie where substantive - Basically SoL of forum state
- borrowing statute - direct a court to look at both the forum limitations period and foreign limitations period and then apply the short period
- if normal choice of law leads to application of foreign statute that creates a substantive right - must apply the entire statute (wrongful death statutes)

23
Q

Domicile by operation of law

A

Newborns are assigned the domicile of their parents

in case of divorce - children assigned domicile of custodial parent

an mentally incompetent individual is assigned domicile of their parents

if become incompetent after acquiring a domicile by choice - retain chosen domicile