Conf. Former Client 4.1-9 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

After representing a Client, who can Atty NOT represent?

A
CONFLICT FORMER
-----------
Your Former was a SMURF
-----------
Person w/ Materially Adverse interest to Former or who you cd Use or Reveal in Same matter
UNLESS Former consents.
-----------
Can you rep new?  Is your old client MIA?
[Material Interest that's Adverse.]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How can Atty use Former’s info?

A

Cannot use to Former’s disadvantage UNLESS allowed by Rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which aspects of Former’s representation can Atty disclose?

A

None UNLESS allowed by Rules.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give 2 examples how you might have to turn away a New Client b/c of your rep of Former Client?

A

If switch teams but same players. Examples:
1) Draft K for C. Later represent other party & sue Former on K.
2) Prosecute. Later defend.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In sum:
State 4 ways 4.1-9 Conflict Former Client, finds conflict?

A
Former is a SMURF
*Basically Atty wd have an advantage*
-----------
1.  Use info for former's disadvantage.
2.  new Client in related matter w/ Materially Adverse interest to former.
3.  Reveal former's info.
4.  Switch teams & work with same players.
UNLESS Former consents.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Distinguish the jingles for Bar Ethics Current Client conflict v. Former Client conflict.

A

ALI says Current poses Same DAM Limits & Risks Relations
Former is a SMURF
———–
CURRENT: Dfn. - Accom, Liklhd, Impact
Same or related case, Directly Advers, Materially Limits, Subst Risk, Related.
———–
FORMER: Use info vs. Former. New has Materially Adverse interest; Reveal Former’s Info, Switch teams.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly