Concepts of AR, MR and Causation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define Actus Reus

A

The actions resulting in criminal outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Potential types of Actus Reus

A

Act, Omission or State of Affairs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define an “Act” + case

A

A voluntary act (D has control over their own actions, Hill v Baxter)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define “Omission”

A

Failure to act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define “State of Affairs” + Case

A

D finds himself in a set of circumstances which are enough for the AR even though he didn’t act voluntarily. (Larsonneur)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Circumstances where omission is accepted AR

A

Duty arising from conduct, Voluntary duty, Contractual duty, Official position, Duty arising from relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contractual duty case

A

R v Pittwood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Duty arising from relationship case

A

R v Gibbins & Proctor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Voluntary Duty case

A

R v Stone & Dobinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Official Position case

A

R v Dytham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define Mens Rea

A

The mental element of a crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types of intent

A

Direct, indirect, recklessness, negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Oblique/indirect intent case

A

Woolin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Virtual Certainty Test

A

Used to apply oblique intent: Was the consequence virtually certain as a result of D’s actions, and did D realise this?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Subjective Recklessness definition + case

A

D knows there is a risk but takes it anyway, and risk is unjustified (Cunningham)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which crime is negligence used in to establish MR?

A

Gross Negligence Manslaughter (Adomako)

17
Q

Rule of transferred malice

A

D’s mens rea can be transferred from target victim to resultant victim (Latimer)

18
Q

Condition of transferred malice

A

The resultant crime must be similar to the one D was going to commit initially. (Pembilton)

19
Q

Elements of causation

A

Factual + Legal + No Intervening Acts

20
Q

Factual Causation + case

A

But for test (Pagett)

21
Q

Legal Causation

A

Substantial + operating cause OR more than minimal

22
Q

Substantial + operating case

A

Smith

23
Q

More than minimal case

A

Benge

24
Q

Intervening Acts cases

A

R v Jordan (Medical), R v Roberts (Act of victim)