Concepts & Categories Flashcards
Concept vs Category
Concept: Representation that organizes our experience
Category: Organizational structure that the concept is about
Classical view of concepts
Problems?
Symbolic structures
Discrete and all-or-nothing
Form knowledge about category
Necessary and sufficient features needed to deduce category membership
- Every member of category is equally good member
Problems:
- Categories are transitive (direct), but this doesn’t always work
- Features don’t capture typicality effects
Prototype theory
Superordinate, basic, subordinate levels
Prototype: Member of category that is the average of a category
Characteristic features (typically associated) and defining features (must apply to 100% of instances)
Superordinate: General (Animals)
Basic: More specific (Dogs) -> Learned first
Subordinate levels: Most specific (Poodles)
Match-to-sample task
How many months old to match to category levels? (16 and 19 months)
16 months -> Can match basic-category items
19 months -> Match superordinate items
How do different languages affect category boundaries?
Different category boundaries created
- Develops over time
- English infants can discriminate between category of tight fit vs loose fit even if this is a Korean linguistic category, but adults struggle with this (perceptual narrowing)
Shape bias
Preference for same shape
- But not universal
Ex:
Solids show shape bias in English but not Japanese (more of material bias)
Non-solids have material bias in both
Complex objects have shape bias in both
Perceptual similarity
A cue for structural similarity (but may not always go together)
- Ex: Same category label = Objects have same property
Essentialism
Biological/natural kinds -> Inference is that they always stay the same no matter what
Artifacts -> Inference is that identity can be changed
Knowledge of growth and healing
Growth:
- Made inferences about how baby animals and kettles look over time
- 3 years: Didn’t know if artifacts grew over time
- 5 years: Know that artifacts can’t grow
Healing:
- 3 years: Know that living things can heal/regrow, but artifacts can’t
Generics
Generic statements have statistical properties that don’t always work
(Ex: You can say “birds fly” but not “books are paperbacks”)
- Perceived danger/distinctiveness magnifies effect for generics
- Belief about generic statement of prevalence % usually higher than acceptance of generic statement
Characterize concepts as timeless, universal and devoid of context
- Minimizes within-category variability
- Helpful for reasoning about new unseen category members (as exceptions), but prone to stereotyping
Gender essentialism
Essentialist vs Interactionist view
Belief that bio properties stay the same applies to gender
- 4-8 year olds belief: Genders have stereotypical characteristics regardless of how they were raised (essentialist view)
- 9-10 year olds belief: Can sometimes grow up to have interests not matching stereotype (interactionist views)
Essentialist vs Structural explanations
Essentialist: More internal explanations
“Zarpies paint colourful stripes on hair because they like rainbow hair”
Structural: More about context or structure of surrounding enviro
- Older children more prone to this
“Zarpies paint colourful stripes on hair so that the giants see them and don’t step on them”