Concepts and categorisation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Why are concepts needed?

A

James (1890) - making sense in the world + acting in it to achieve our aims

Language = labels of concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is in a concept?

A

What makes something a member of a category.
Necessary conditions = needs to be together sufficient for being a bird

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the classical view

A

Developed by philosophers
There are 2 (equivalent) ways of turning this idea = psychological theory of how concepts are stored + used

FEATURE THEORIES = we store the sets of conditions as lists of features E.g. Smith, Shoben, and Rips 1974

NETWORK THEORIES = we store concepts in networks with IS and HAS links (BIRD is ANIMAL; BIRD has FEATHERS)
* E.g. Collins and Quillian, 1972

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What do semantic network of concepts look like?

A

Developed for concepts referring to objects or living things
there’s hierachy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does Eleanor Rosch say about typicality?

A

noted that features or network links are not all that matters

Typical members of categories are processed more easily than atypical members (robin vs ostrich as an example of a bird)

Led to the prototype theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the prototype theory?

A

concepts are represented by PROTOTYPES

Category membership depends on which prototype a particular
thing is closest to = depends on a measure of closeness

An alternative idea = prototypes are not themselves represented,
only exemplars + clustering of exemplars determines centre of the space that a particular concept occupies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the problems of the prototype theory?

A

CONCEPTUAL COMBINATION
We don’t just use individual concepts, we can combine them.

AD HOC CONCEPTS (Barsalou, 1983) – concepts and their corresponding categories = together on the fly + not stored in
memory E.g. things to save in a house fire – although they are not stored in memory, they do show prototype effects

MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS (Armstrong, Gleitman, & Gleitman,
1983.e.g. odd number) – they do show prototypicality effects (7 is a
more prototypical odd number than 343239089), but they have clear analytical definitions (odd numbers are not divisible by 2) – they are not DEFINED by prototypes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is conceptual combination?

A

Conceptual combination = complex process: compare TIN + CAN =>
“tin can” + TIN + MINE = “tin mine”

Conceptual combination has been seen as a particular problem for prototype theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the ‘theory’ theory

A

scientific concepts are defined by the role they play in
scientific theories, our everyday concepts are defined by their place in lay theories about the world and how it “works”.

”Theory” theory deals well w/ conceptual combination

for example, lay theories tell us that cans can be made of tin, but mines cannot (but they can be a source of tin)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are basic level categories?

A

(Rosch et al., 1976)
* In a hierarchy, such as Braeburn – Apple – Fruit, concepts at one of the levels are easiest to deal with (on all sorts of measures)
* In this case Apple, with other concepts at this level being, e.g., Banana and Orange

At this (basic) level, features of one type of object = strong “correlational structure”, which is different from that of other types of object
* Apples are similar, but apples and bananas differ

  • At the higher level, fruits are diverse
  • So one piece of fruit is not necessarily very similar to another one

At the lower level, Braeburns are similar to Galas and Granny Smiths
* So, things in different categories resemble one another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What types of concept?

A

Docus on concepts associated with concrete nouns. There are two main types
* Natural kinds (people, animals, plants, natural objects)
* Artefacts (man made objects: table, building, etc.)

Less studied are abstract concepts, including scientific concepts (gravity, evolution, etc.) + social/societal concepts (family, law, government, etc.)

There are also concepts associated with verbs (events – “hit”, states) + adjectives (properties of nouns, “red”) + adverbs (properties of verbs, “suddenly”)

then some concepts help to link ideas (“and”, “because”, “before”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How care abstract concepts understood?

A

understood via networks of (metaphorical) links to concrete concepts (Lakoff & Johnson’s, 1980, “Metaphors we live by”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does embodiment mean?

A

The traditional treatment of concepts = formal analysis

to understand many concepts you = know how people interact with the world “chair”

  • Furthermore, the encoding of such concepts = common with our motor knowledge of how to interact with (“use”) chairs.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evidence supporting embodiment and the motor complex

A

(Pulvermüller et al., 2005)
They applied TMS (Transcortical Magnetic Stimulation) to motor brain regions

Faster reactions to leg-related words (“kick”) with leg region stimulation and faster reactions to arm-related words (“pick”) with arm region stimulation

Language is not modular or abstract but an integrated part of the experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Action Compatibility Effect (ACE)

A

Glenberg and Kaschak (2002)
* Pushing a lever away from you to confirm that “You closed the drawer” = OK sentence
* Pulling a lever towards you to confirm that “You opened the drawer” is an OK sentence

  • The action required to respond is compatible (in direction) w? the action described

Responses are quicker than with the opposite pairings (close/towards; open/away)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Action Compatibility Effect (ACE)

A

Glenberg and Kaschak (2002)
* Pushing a lever away from you to confirm that “You closed the drawer” = OK sentence
* Pulling a lever towards you to confirm that “You opened the drawer” is an OK sentence

  • The action required to respond is compatible (in direction) w? the action described

Responses are quicker than with the opposite pairings (close/towards; open/away)

16
Q

What is embodied cognition: up and down

A

Pecher et al. (20100

Respond “yes” or “no” to: “Is it found in the sky?” or “Is it found in
the ocean?”

List of “sky” words (e.g. helicopter) and “ocean” words (e.g. whale)

Pecher et al. presented each word (NOT pictures) at the top
or bottom of the screen
* Where do participants expect the word (based on embodied
experience)?
* ”helicopter” – top; “whale” - bottom
Responses = slower when the type of word doesn’t match the word’s expected position (top for sky words; bottom for ocean words)

17
Q

What were the results of Pecher et al (2010)

A

people = a mental simulation of the task-congruent location, which directs spatial attention and facilitates processing of targets in that
location.”

effect of congruence between the type of word and the type of
decision as well as between type of word and position

18
Q

What is embodied cognition and shape imagery?

A

Zwaan, Stanfield and Yaxley (2002)
Text representations should include perceptual properties, even if those
properties are not mentioned.
* Sentence followed by picture – participants had to name the picture

19
Q

What was the results of Swan (Zwaan, Stanfield and Yaxley (2002)?

A

Zwaan, Stanfield and Yaxley (2002)
* Text representations should include perceptual properties, even if those
properties are not mentioned.
* Sentence followed by picture – participants had to name the picture

20
Q

What happens to embodied cognition, orientation and colour?

A

Stanfield and Zwaan (2001) reported similar effects for orientation (vertical pencil/putting in a pot, horizontal pencil/putting in a drawer).

Controversy = whether the opposite effect can be found (incompatibility leads to faster responses)
Connell (2005, 2007) reported = effect for colour (pick a leaf off a tree – orange/brown vs pick a leaf off the ground – green)

However, Zwaan & Pecher (2012) failed to replicate this effect and found a standard compatibility effect instead.

Connell and Lynott (2009)
* Ps read a sentence implying a particular colour for the target:
* “Joe was excited to see a bear in the woods” brown bear (typical prime)
* “Joe was excited to see a bear at the North Pole”  white bear (atypical prime)
* Then asked to name the colour of a target word in three conditions (Stroop-like task):

21
Q

How did people read the colour?

A

How quickly did people read the colour?*
Always quick to say “brown” no matter what (typical colour)
* Always slow to say “yellow” no matter what (unrelated colour)
* BUT: response to white changed depending on the sentence!

Suggests that the colour we expect something to be is automatically evoked by language!*

It is part of the concept/representation in the mind. expectation can be modified in a non-standard context (though notice that
the most common colour overallsticks around as well!)