Composition and Rhetoric Flashcards
Activating background knowledge, predicting or asking questions, visualizing imagery, and drawing inferences are all
reading strategies
Picking out key ideas, synthesizing, stopping to clarify understanding, confirming predictions, using graphic organizers, and reflection are all
reading strategies
Semantic cueing is the same as using
context clues
Syntax cueing is
looking at the order of words to make meaning out of a sentence
To use background knowledge as a cueing system…
students may pause and reflect on background knowledge to make meaning out of the text ahead
Using before/after/during reading skills to self-monitor comprehension and use fix-up strategies is referred to as
metacognition
Analyzing a student’s reading strategies and recording any departures from the text to find clues to their reading process is called
miscue analysis
The four levels of reading comprehension are
Literal, Interpretive/Inferential, Critical, Creative
A few methods for assessing reading progress might include
daily observation, running record, informal reading inventory, rubric, miscue analysis, and diagnosis of errors
The three ways language acquisition occurs is through
receptive (receiving the language externally), cognitive (forming thoughts), expressive (speaking/writing/gesturing)
This 2nd language acquisition hypothesis believes language is both acquired in an unconscious striving to communicate on a daily basis and learned through formal instruction of language
Acquisition-learning hypothesis
This 2nd language acquisition hypothesis suggests that the acquired affects the learned–meaning the person monitors their speech to apply learned rules in order to edit acquired language
Monitor hypothesis
This 2nd language acquisition hypothesis contends there are four natural steps - single words, stringing words together, identifying beginnings/ends to sentences, identifying elements within sentences and forming them into questions
Natural order hypothesis
This 2nd language acquisition hypothesis suggests that learners must encounter language a step beyond their natural order of acquiring it (from natural order hypothesis)
Input hypothesis
This 2nd language acquisition hypothesis believes that external factors like motivation, confidence, and anxiety impede language acquisition.
Affective filter hypothesis