Comparison - TTP Flashcards
Comparison in GMAT
A comparison in a sentence is logical when like things are compared with each other e.g.
John is like Melisa; they both love Caribbean beaches (noun being compared with noun)
The teeth of the grey wolf are similar in size to the teeth of the red wolf (noun being compared with noun)
What are few signals in a sentence that indicate a comparison?
Like, unlike, as, such, more than, less than, similar to, correspondingly, nevertheless
Observe the below sentence.
The cost of summer camp is much higher than summer school
In comparison with the president’s views, the vice president is conservative
Like many CEOs, Jack’s budget appeared well reasoned, however, it was badly flawed
- The first sentence is illogical as it compares the cost of summer camp with summer school
The cost of summer camp is much higher than the cost of summer school
- This sentence illogically compares president views with the vice president, one should compare president with president or views with views
- Here the sentence compares CEO with a budget which is not correct, the correct form of the sentence would be
Like the budgets of many CEOs, Jack’s budget appeared well reasoned; however, it was badly flawed
(Notice we are comparing plural budgets with budget in the above sentence, but it is still corrrect)
Select the correct option from below
The gardens in the city are as prolific as in the suburbs
a) as prolific as in the suburbs
b) prolific like in the suburbs
c) prolific like in the suburbs is
d) like the prolificness of those in the suburbs
e) as prolific as those in the suburbs
a) Notice this sentence is comparing ‘gardens in the city’ and ‘in the suburbs’. We cannot compare something, gardens, with a location, in the suburbs. So the comparison is illogical
b) Sentence is comparing gardens in the city and in the suburbs. We cannot compare something, gardens with a location in the suburbs. So the comparison is illogical
c) This version still compares gardens in the city and in the suburbs
d) Gardens must be compared with gardens, or with something else that could be prolific, and prolificness must be compared with prolificness
e) Correct answer choice, use of those refer back to the garden
What is wrong with the below sentence?
Julia is more skilled than any singer I’ve encountered
Since Julia is part of class singer, this would imply that we are comparing Julia with Julia, to fix the sentence use other as below
Julia is more skilled than any other singer I’ve encountered
What is wrong with the below sentence?
The bears that live in Texas survive longer than they do in Vegas
The issue with the sentence is that noun ‘the bears’ is being restrictively modified by the prepositional phrase because we are not talking about any bear in particular but the one that lives in Texas. So the pronoun ‘they’ does not refer back to ‘bears’ but rather to ‘The bears that live in Texas’ now try replacing the pronoun they with it and you will see why the sentence is incorrect.
So in comparison, place close attention to nouns and their modifiers, one simple way to fix the sentence is to repeat the noun bears
Trees that are planted in rich soil grow faster than they do in poor soil (The same issue as the above sentence)
Observe the below two sentences
- Jim attends the club meetings less regularly than Andrew attends the club meetings
- Jim attends the club meetings less regularly than Andrew does
- Andrea worked more carefully than Shashank worked
- Andrea worked more carefully than Shashank did
Notice how in the two sentences we have made the second versions of the sentence concise by removing the repeating words with do/does or did.
One more thing to notice is only in some cases removing do/does or did might work because sentence still might be able to convey the unambiguous meaning but it won’t work all the time, so be cautious of it
Observe the below sentences
- Because significantly more people applied during this year’s application period than were during last year’s application period, it seems clear that the school’s strategy is working
- Archeologist using modern equipment are better able to find buried historical sites than archeologist could in the past
- While traveling around the world, the travelers found that the trains in Europe were more comfortable and in better condition than had been trains on which they had ridden on other continents
- the first sentence is wrong because it illogically compares ‘more people applied’ vs ‘what people were’
- While ‘are able’ and ‘could’ are similar in meaning, the sentence is illogical because it compares how able modern archeologists are with archeologists could. to fix this replace could with ‘were’
- The sentence is correct and it compares how trains in Europe were with how other trains had been
Observe the below sentences
- Alex is much nicer to me than Alfredo
- Sara loves shark diving more than Scott
The two sentences are ambiguous because each of the sentence could convey two meanings
- Alex is more nice to me than Alfredo is to me or Alex is more nice to me than to Alfredo
- Sara loves shark diving more than she loves Scott or Sara loves shark diving more than Scott loves shark diving
Observe the below sentence?
- The tent is just as waterproof.
- The researcher believed that they had finally developed a method for determining the composition of faraway planets, but the method turned out not be as effective
- The amateurs astronauts had expected to find alpha Centauri in the night sky, but, because it is not very different, they didn’t find it until they used a star chart.
All of the above are e.g. of incomplete comparison, so in all the sentences of comparison just be wary what is being compared with what
- Just as waterproof as what, the sentence is an example of incomplete comparison, where we do not have other items which are being compared with
- Given the sentence mentions that it is the new method that has been developed, the sentence ends by saying it is not as effective, so what it is being compared with is not defined, hence the comparison is incomplete
- Again different from what is not defined rendering the comparison incomplete
What is wrong with the below sentence?
- Because his car is so similar, my friend ends up walking around in a parking lot clicking the key fob to determine which car is his
- Of the two new ways to produce jet fuel sustainability, the way that involves scrubbing carbon from the atmosphere is the more interesting one
- Sentence does not define similar to what?, so the comparison is incomplete
- Even though the sentence ‘ the more interesting one’ does not itself mention what ‘the one’ is more interesting than, the sentence clearly indicates that ‘the more interesting one’ is one of the two ways to produce jet fuel sustainability. So the sentence makes clear that ‘the more interesting one’ is more interesting than the other new way of producing jet fuel sustainability
Select the best answer choice in the below sentence.
Unlike the weather in the Hawaiian Islands, which tends to be significantly cooler during the winter months than the summer, the weather in Panama is consistently warmer
a) Unlike the weather in the Hawaiian Islands, which tends to be significantly cooler during the winter months than the summer, the weather in Panama is consistently warmer
b) The weather in Panama is consistently warmer than that of the Hawaiian Islands, which tend to be significantly cooler during the winter months than the summer months are
c) The weather in Panama is consistently warmer than it is in the Hawaiian Islands, where it tends to be significantly cooler during the winter months than it is during the summer months
d) Whereas, during the winter months, the weather in the Hawaiian Islands becomes significantly cooler than they are during the summer, the weather in Panama is consistently warmer.
e) In Panama, the weather is consistently warmer than that of the Hawaiian Islands, which tends to be significantly cooler during the winter months than in summer.
a) In a the non-restrictive modifier ‘which’ refers to weather and not Island, reason because it says ‘which tends’ given Island is plural tends won’t be correct. Now due to which referring to the weather, the sentence is illogically comparing weather and winter months, which is non-sensical
b) Same as the above, illogical comparison b/w Islands and winter months, Notice how now modifier refers to islands unlike in the previous sentence
c) Here pronoun ‘it’ refers to ‘The weather in Panama’ and not ‘The weather’ due to ‘The weather’ being restrictively modified by ‘in Panama’
d) What do they refer to?
e) Correct answer
Usage of ‘Like’ vs ‘Such as’
The word like can be used in the comparison, but not to introduce examples. For including examples, ‘such as’ is commonly used. ‘including’ is also used to introduce examples
What is wrong with the below sentence?
When traveling through the Everglades, one may see many animals, like snakes, mammals, and alligators
The use of like here is incorrect as we use like only for comparison but not to introduce examples, using like here implies that animals which were seen were the ones like of snake, mammals, and alligator
Below is the correct form
When traveling through the Everglades, one may see many animals, such as snakes, mammals, and alligators
Observe the below sentence
The boy received for his birthday such toys as action figures, a soccer ball, and a board game, and his favourite among them was a tricky puzzle
The boy received for his birthday many toys such as action figures, a soccer ball, and a board game, and his favourite among them was a tricky puzzle
Both the sentences are correct, the reason for this example was to show that ‘such as’ can also be separated to introduce the example in the sentence